Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is not a limited number of AAP spots. Stop with the false narrative about one group taking away from another's spots.
Agree with PP who noted that the spanish speakers are from Spain/otherwise white. I've noticed the same. Our kid's class had AA.
The criteria for admission should stay the same or go higher for AAP. The answer is not to water down the pool. That does not serve the bright kids who truly need the advanced pace.
The false narrative is that there is unlimited space (physical space), unlimited resources (teacher availability) available to each school and no racial profiling going on. It's people like you who are spreading the false narrative. If any of that was true, FCPS could just put out thresholds (enough to capture a certain % of URMs) and say anyone who meets the threshold is in. You wouldn't need a central committee to screen anything. It's an in or out decision, based on some numerical criteria whether it be CoGAT score, GBRS or some other value.
Um, there are threshold minimum limits to what kids must score on the CogAT and NNAT.
No, there is a threshold minimum for whether you are automatically "in pool" for consideration. There is no threshold minimum that guarantees you a spot into LIV.
Anonymous wrote:So each school DOES have limited AAP Spots due to the available classrooms and teachers. I know ours has a max of 90 and last year only had 75.
Anonymous wrote:
Um, there are threshold minimum limits to what kids must score on the CogAT and NNAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is not a limited number of AAP spots. Stop with the false narrative about one group taking away from another's spots.
Agree with PP who noted that the spanish speakers are from Spain/otherwise white. I've noticed the same. Our kid's class had AA.
The criteria for admission should stay the same or go higher for AAP. The answer is not to water down the pool. That does not serve the bright kids who truly need the advanced pace.
why do they bright kids truly need an advanced pace, and why is it the county's responsibility to provide it? I have no qualms with any kid who can do level IV work being in level IV- of course that would mean the majority in some schools because level IV is what level II should be
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is not a limited number of AAP spots. Stop with the false narrative about one group taking away from another's spots.
Agree with PP who noted that the spanish speakers are from Spain/otherwise white. I've noticed the same. Our kid's class had AA.
The criteria for admission should stay the same or go higher for AAP. The answer is not to water down the pool. That does not serve the bright kids who truly need the advanced pace.
The false narrative is that there is unlimited space (physical space), unlimited resources (teacher availability) available to each school and no racial profiling going on. It's people like you who are spreading the false narrative. If any of that was true, FCPS could just put out thresholds (enough to capture a certain % of URMs) and say anyone who meets the threshold is in. You wouldn't need a central committee to screen anything. It's an in or out decision, based on some numerical criteria whether it be CoGAT score, GBRS or some other value.
Um, there are threshold minimum limits to what kids must score on the CogAT and NNAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hindsight! What was that movie in the 80s where the actor checks off a different ethnicity to get into Harvard?! I'm joking ... but reading that other thread, I'm thinking people may be creatively applying the ethnic profile on themselves and their kids.
23 and me should give you insight
American Indian?! Be like Warren ...
go back 100,000 years and we're all African Americans.
Anonymous wrote:There is not a limited number of AAP spots. Stop with the false narrative about one group taking away from another's spots.
Agree with PP who noted that the spanish speakers are from Spain/otherwise white. I've noticed the same. Our kid's class had AA.
The criteria for admission should stay the same or go higher for AAP. The answer is not to water down the pool. That does not serve the bright kids who truly need the advanced pace.
Anonymous wrote:There is not a limited number of AAP spots. Stop with the false narrative about one group taking away from another's spots.
Agree with PP who noted that the spanish speakers are from Spain/otherwise white. I've noticed the same. Our kid's class had AA.
The criteria for admission should stay the same or go higher for AAP. The answer is not to water down the pool. That does not serve the bright kids who truly need the advanced pace.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hindsight! What was that movie in the 80s where the actor checks off a different ethnicity to get into Harvard?! I'm joking ... but reading that other thread, I'm thinking people may be creatively applying the ethnic profile on themselves and their kids.
23 and me should give you insight
American Indian?! Be like Warren ...
Anonymous wrote:What bothers me about considering race is that people of certain ethnicities are compared to each other instead of the group as whole. Ie. Is this Asian better at then the other Asians? Is this Hispanic higher than other Hispanics? What about the group as a whole? CLEARLY race is a factor in placement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hindsight! What was that movie in the 80s where the actor checks off a different ethnicity to get into Harvard?! I'm joking ... but reading that other thread, I'm thinking people may be creatively applying the ethnic profile on themselves and their kids.
23 and me should give you insight
American Indian?! Be like Warren ...