Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 to 2
But I think have three kids is way harder than having two. The transition to three was easy, actually having them, less so.
I totally agree with this BUT I spend a lot of time with my kids in the summer by myself. So going from 1 to 2 felt difficult but going from 2 to 3 wasn't such a big deal because I was already outnumbered. However, actually having 3 kids seems like mathematically much more work than 2--it doesn't feel like 3 times the laundry, it feels like 10 times the laundry, 10 times louder, 10 times more coordination of pick up/drop off/doctors appointments, etc. But I wouldn't trade it for anything, my third balances out my older two and is the sweetest and still gives me cuddles!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:0 to 1
+1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 to 2
But I think have three kids is way harder than having two. The transition to three was easy, actually having them, less so.
I totally agree with this BUT I spend a lot of time with my kids in the summer by myself. So going from 1 to 2 felt difficult but going from 2 to 3 wasn't such a big deal because I was already outnumbered. However, actually having 3 kids seems like mathematically much more work than 2--it doesn't feel like 3 times the laundry, it feels like 10 times the laundry, 10 times louder, 10 times more coordination of pick up/drop off/doctors appointments, etc. But I wouldn't trade it for anything, my third balances out my older two and is the sweetest and still gives me cuddles!!
Agree with all of this, but especially 10 times the laundry. Oh, the laundry!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 to 2
But I think have three kids is way harder than having two. The transition to three was easy, actually having them, less so.
I totally agree with this BUT I spend a lot of time with my kids in the summer by myself. So going from 1 to 2 felt difficult but going from 2 to 3 wasn't such a big deal because I was already outnumbered. However, actually having 3 kids seems like mathematically much more work than 2--it doesn't feel like 3 times the laundry, it feels like 10 times the laundry, 10 times louder, 10 times more coordination of pick up/drop off/doctors appointments, etc. But I wouldn't trade it for anything, my third balances out my older two and is the sweetest and still gives me cuddles!!
Anonymous wrote:1 to 2
But I think have three kids is way harder than having two. The transition to three was easy, actually having them, less so.
Anonymous wrote:For me, 0 to 1 was the hardest.
For DH it was 1 to 2.
We now have 3, and 2 to 3 was by far the easiest for both of us. That said, we're also done at 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1 to 2
But I think have three kids is way harder than having two. The transition to three was easy, actually having them, less so.
How so?
I’m not the pp, but I didn’t find anything as disruptive to my work, my marriage, my free time, and my friendships as having our first child. Having my second or third didn’t really change those things much. But the day to day is difficult with three. They egg each other on, there is less free time, there is more laundry and cooking, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went from 1 to 3 (twins). It was ROUGH!
I was 0 to 3 with triplets. No transition was hard after that.
Anonymous wrote:I went from 1 to 3 (twins). It was ROUGH!