Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought my pk student could do live lessons because he did watch some TV. Nope, didn't translate in my house . He mashed the keys of the keyboard and refused to do the body movement activities the teachers tried. Love our teachers but live PK learning stressed my family out.
I mean it takes consistency and actual work. Some of my students did that too but after 2-3 weeks they stopped and these are children with disabilities. I get it's stressful but can't really relate to parents who say it will NEVER work. I mean I had students with all kinds of issues and parents with hectic jobs, what's your excuse? And a little dance through a webcam isn't very engaging, PS/PK teacher will have to think way outside of the box.
But if you won't or can't put in the effort I hope you're doing a pod or something else.
Anonymous wrote:I thought my pk student could do live lessons because he did watch some TV. Nope, didn't translate in my house . He mashed the keys of the keyboard and refused to do the body movement activities the teachers tried. Love our teachers but live PK learning stressed my family out.
Anonymous wrote:In today’s staff town hall, DCPS said they are still considering options for PK DL. So right now there is nothing (I really think DCPS never considered the possibility that they couldn’t reopen), but they are at least thinking about doing something. I’m guessing packets and individual check ins with teachers. No group live sessions.
Anonymous wrote:No one needs to curate remote content for 3-4 year olds. Parents can find their own youtube channel and redeploy these resources. That seems very logical.
Anonymous wrote:Am I understanding it right? If schools are closed, there will be no PK3 or PK4?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. Correct.
Did they announce this?
Look at the plan for DCPS. It has Prek 3 & 4 doing "school" 2 days a week- the other 3 days are simply "home", where other grades are designated as "virtual" on the non-"school" days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. Correct.
Did they announce this?
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This will force many low income working families into joblessness.
No virtual learning will do this? No, because the parents would need to be home or be paying someone to be home with the kid anyway. Not having in person could certainly affect the job situation, but not having virtual learning doesn’t impact jobs. There’s really not much of value you can do virtually with a 3 year old and it has to be fully supervised by an adult at home.
+1
Speak for yourself. My 3-year-old got a lot out of the virtual learning her private preschool offered when the pandemic first hit. Give us the options, you choose what works for your family.
Anonymous wrote:Here's a better idea: Open schools to young children. Distance learning doesn't work for them and -- here's the important part -- they rarely get coronavirus and they don't spread coronavirus.