Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, it is a thing of the past unless you have severe symptoms. In fact, the whole idea of it being "replacement" therapy sounds like it is a deficit, so it is now referred to as HT- hormone therapy. Women at menopause have what is for them a normal level of hormones at that time of life, and nothing needs to be "replaced" -so that language is even out of favor. -an MD mom.
And this is a shame, because you can feel better even with mild symptoms. Why suffer through menopause?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, it is a thing of the past unless you have severe symptoms. In fact, the whole idea of it being "replacement" therapy sounds like it is a deficit, so it is now referred to as HT- hormone therapy. Women at menopause have what is for them a normal level of hormones at that time of life, and nothing needs to be "replaced" -so that language is even out of favor. -an MD mom.
And this is a shame, because you can feel better even with mild symptoms. Why suffer through menopause?
Anonymous wrote:No, it is a thing of the past unless you have severe symptoms. In fact, the whole idea of it being "replacement" therapy sounds like it is a deficit, so it is now referred to as HT- hormone therapy. Women at menopause have what is for them a normal level of hormones at that time of life, and nothing needs to be "replaced" -so that language is even out of favor. -an MD mom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, most women are not on HRT. Long term use has been proven to cause breast cancer, blood clots/MIs/strokes. If you have a hysterectomy with ovaries removed prior to menopause, then HRT may be necessary to lessen the initial shock of instant menopause, but even then it should be closely monitored by a physician. Once natural menopause would have occurred , the HRT should be tapered off.
This is just not true.