Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Damaged lungs is a real concern
https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/507442-almost-one-third-of-florida-children-tested-are
There’s a lot of conjecture and no proof. The elusive “they say...”
There isn’t one study that has been released showing asymptomatic children have suffered lung damage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought the subject was going to be concerned for kids because of lack of school and social activities.
Same here, I read children have gained an average of 7 pounds since March, that’s a lot of weight for a small body over such a short period of time.
This is the parents’ fault.
Anonymous wrote:I completely agree with the covid shutdowns, in order to save the vulnerable, especially the elderly. But it's an observed fact that covid is less risky for children than normal flu. Here's a link to a May 5 analysis.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-07/comparing-coronavirus-deaths-by-age-with-flu-driving-fatalities
Quote: "For children, the risk of dying from Covid-19 appears to be much less than that of dying from influenza and pneumonia even in the most pessimistic of my three scenarios. From age 15 onward the Covid risk is higher, with the relative difference peaking for those in the 45 through 54 age group, whose risk of dying from Covid-19 in my middle scenario is four and a half times higher than their influenza and pneumonia mortality rate in 2018."
Covid is serious, but less so for children. If you have credible data about long term complications, please post it.
Anonymous wrote:Damaged lungs is a real concern
https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/507442-almost-one-third-of-florida-children-tested-are
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought the subject was going to be concerned for kids because of lack of school and social activities.
Same here, I read children have gained an average of 7 pounds since March, that’s a lot of weight for a small body over such a short period of time.
Anonymous wrote:I thought the subject was going to be concerned for kids because of lack of school and social activities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I completely agree with the covid shutdowns, in order to save the vulnerable, especially the elderly. But it's an observed fact that covid is less risky for children than normal flu. Here's a link to a May 5 analysis.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-07/comparing-coronavirus-deaths-by-age-with-flu-driving-fatalities
Quote: "For children, the risk of dying from Covid-19 appears to be much less than that of dying from influenza and pneumonia even in the most pessimistic of my three scenarios. From age 15 onward the Covid risk is higher, with the relative difference peaking for those in the 45 through 54 age group, whose risk of dying from Covid-19 in my middle scenario is four and a half times higher than their influenza and pneumonia mortality rate in 2018."
Covid is serious, but less so for children. If you have credible data about long term complications, please post it.
And in the 3 months since that article they have figured out that even those without symptoms can get serious lung damage
Please show me evidence. I seriously would like to see it.
It would be nice if our government funded a study but in the meantime you have the word of doctors here is one https://www.winknews.com/2020/07/17/health-officials-worry-about-long-term-effects-of-covid-19-on-kids/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I completely agree with the covid shutdowns, in order to save the vulnerable, especially the elderly. But it's an observed fact that covid is less risky for children than normal flu. Here's a link to a May 5 analysis.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-07/comparing-coronavirus-deaths-by-age-with-flu-driving-fatalities
Quote: "For children, the risk of dying from Covid-19 appears to be much less than that of dying from influenza and pneumonia even in the most pessimistic of my three scenarios. From age 15 onward the Covid risk is higher, with the relative difference peaking for those in the 45 through 54 age group, whose risk of dying from Covid-19 in my middle scenario is four and a half times higher than their influenza and pneumonia mortality rate in 2018."
Covid is serious, but less so for children. If you have credible data about long term complications, please post it.
And in the 3 months since that article they have figured out that even those without symptoms can get serious lung damage
Please show me evidence. I seriously would like to see it.
It would be nice if our government funded a study but in the meantime you have the word of doctors here is one https://www.winknews.com/2020/07/17/health-officials-worry-about-long-term-effects-of-covid-19-on-kids/
Don’t be irresponsible PP, this is a direct quote from the article...
It would be irresponsible for me to say, ‘There will never be any long term’ because we just don’t know. But it’s also problematic to say in 20 years, there’s going to be all of these problems because we just don’t know that.
Summation: They don’t know what they don’t know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I completely agree with the covid shutdowns, in order to save the vulnerable, especially the elderly. But it's an observed fact that covid is less risky for children than normal flu. Here's a link to a May 5 analysis.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-07/comparing-coronavirus-deaths-by-age-with-flu-driving-fatalities
Quote: "For children, the risk of dying from Covid-19 appears to be much less than that of dying from influenza and pneumonia even in the most pessimistic of my three scenarios. From age 15 onward the Covid risk is higher, with the relative difference peaking for those in the 45 through 54 age group, whose risk of dying from Covid-19 in my middle scenario is four and a half times higher than their influenza and pneumonia mortality rate in 2018."
Covid is serious, but less so for children. If you have credible data about long term complications, please post it.
And in the 3 months since that article they have figured out that even those without symptoms can get serious lung damage
Please show me evidence. I seriously would like to see it.
Anonymous wrote:No one ever, at any point, said kids don’t get Covid, only that they tend to get milder cases and very, very rarely die.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I completely agree with the covid shutdowns, in order to save the vulnerable, especially the elderly. But it's an observed fact that covid is less risky for children than normal flu. Here's a link to a May 5 analysis.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-07/comparing-coronavirus-deaths-by-age-with-flu-driving-fatalities
Quote: "For children, the risk of dying from Covid-19 appears to be much less than that of dying from influenza and pneumonia even in the most pessimistic of my three scenarios. From age 15 onward the Covid risk is higher, with the relative difference peaking for those in the 45 through 54 age group, whose risk of dying from Covid-19 in my middle scenario is four and a half times higher than their influenza and pneumonia mortality rate in 2018."
Covid is serious, but less so for children. If you have credible data about long term complications, please post it.
And in the 3 months since that article they have figured out that even those without symptoms can get serious lung damage