Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never had an epidural, but just wanted to say that pushing is the best feeling of the entire labor process. It's very (pain) relieving.
Seriously? I guess if you like feeling like your vag is being ripped apart. I could not disagree more. For me the sensation was akin to Braveheart being quartered like in the movie, except it was happening in my rectum and vagina. That’s why I would never encourage anyone to go for a natural
Birth. It was horrifically painful.
Anonymous wrote:I've never had an epidural, but just wanted to say that pushing is the best feeling of the entire labor process. It's very (pain) relieving.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For people that had no epidural and a worse experience than with an epidural, were you with an OB or midwifery practice? I’m just wondering if it could be related to OBs not knowing how to handle the lack of epidural. (It could also be unrelated, but this is an online forum and not science, so I’m just wondering)
I delivered twice with epidurals and once without (my choice), all with midwives. The epidural-free was staggeringly painful, though I wouldn't describe it as a "worse" experience. It just hurt a hell of a lot more. My midwives supported me in all three births.
I hope you're not trying to make the argument that pain in unmedicated labor is largely a function of tension or stress or whatever. It hurts because it hurts, at least for most women. My midwives were with me the entire time I was pushing, and for as much of the labor before that as they could be. My nurse was with me as much as possible, too. Even when they know how to support women who labor unmedicated, most women still find it physically painful (again, not worse, more painful).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For people that had no epidural and a worse experience than with an epidural, were you with an OB or midwifery practice? I’m just wondering if it could be related to OBs not knowing how to handle the lack of epidural. (It could also be unrelated, but this is an online forum and not science, so I’m just wondering)
What would make you think that? Do you think OBs never deliver without an epidural?
OBs are better prepared for complications and see way more cases with epidurals. Just wondering if among the cases in the forum there’s a pattern or if it’s all the same.
Anonymous wrote:For people that had no epidural and a worse experience than with an epidural, were you with an OB or midwifery practice? I’m just wondering if it could be related to OBs not knowing how to handle the lack of epidural. (It could also be unrelated, but this is an online forum and not science, so I’m just wondering)
Anonymous wrote:For people that had no epidural and a worse experience than with an epidural, were you with an OB or midwifery practice? I’m just wondering if it could be related to OBs not knowing how to handle the lack of epidural. (It could also be unrelated, but this is an online forum and not science, so I’m just wondering)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For people that had no epidural and a worse experience than with an epidural, were you with an OB or midwifery practice? I’m just wondering if it could be related to OBs not knowing how to handle the lack of epidural. (It could also be unrelated, but this is an online forum and not science, so I’m just wondering)
What would make you think that? Do you think OBs never deliver without an epidural?
Anonymous wrote:For people that had no epidural and a worse experience than with an epidural, were you with an OB or midwifery practice? I’m just wondering if it could be related to OBs not knowing how to handle the lack of epidural. (It could also be unrelated, but this is an online forum and not science, so I’m just wondering)