Anonymous wrote:I work for at a public university and we explored the idea of placing cameras in classrooms to implement a live hybrid model. The cost was $250K+ to outfit classrooms with cameras, AV equipment and quality microphones, plus labor costs. It would cost MCPS at least $1M. No way the county can cover the cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
They are alone because their parents are...wait for it...working. The entire point is that parents cannot be home schooling, they have jobs.
I mean, they are alone because they are distance learning individually in their homes. Is that difficult to understand? Teens are pack animals. Just being in a group setting makes things easier for many of them.
We are choosing DL for our teens, but I don't think it's easy at all. And sadly I think that the attempts to basically replicate IP learning at home via the internet does a lot to expose the flaws in the system without leveraging the opportunities posed by DL. That will come, in due time. But in the meantime, it's going to be very challenging for all of us.
And, hey, if DL is easy for you and your family, then great! That is a good thing and I'm genuinely glad that a good option is open to you.
My kids are participating in pack activities online for hours a day. They're playing on line games with groups of other kids. How is this different?
Sigh. I can never quite understand questions like this. Or -- then maybe I do.
Because you're not really asking, are you? You're not dumb, you're just playing the part online as part of a self-reinforcing game you play with yourself in which you make yourself feel superior.
It's a rhetorical question for you, designed to prove a point. You've already arrived at your conclusion and you're arguing backwards.
Otherwise, why would you be deliberately obtuse about this?
See, I can ask rhetorical questions, too.
Here are my questions:
Do you really think DL and IP learning pose identical challenges and opportunities?
Is email the same as an in-person conversation? Is texting?
Why travel when you can see everything online?
Why go to restaurants when you can order out?
Why see family when you can zoom?
I'll tell you what. You go back to congratulating yourself on your perceived superiority -- I mean, your childrens' capacity to play online video games for hours a day is really quite an achievement -- and the rest of us will have a constructive discussion about the challenges posed to other, less video-game-successful students and how to meet them.
Here, here. Now this is a post. +100
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
Because they are sitting alone in a room with a screen. They are also missing the teacher who is walking around the room telling them to stop talking and start working. They may have the zoom on, but that doesn't mean they are actually paying attention and tuning in.
In high school????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
They are alone because their parents are...wait for it...working. The entire point is that parents cannot be home schooling, they have jobs.
I mean, they are alone because they are distance learning individually in their homes. Is that difficult to understand? Teens are pack animals. Just being in a group setting makes things easier for many of them.
We are choosing DL for our teens, but I don't think it's easy at all. And sadly I think that the attempts to basically replicate IP learning at home via the internet does a lot to expose the flaws in the system without leveraging the opportunities posed by DL. That will come, in due time. But in the meantime, it's going to be very challenging for all of us.
And, hey, if DL is easy for you and your family, then great! That is a good thing and I'm genuinely glad that a good option is open to you.
My kids are participating in pack activities online for hours a day. They're playing on line games with groups of other kids. How is this different?
Sigh. I can never quite understand questions like this. Or -- then maybe I do.
Because you're not really asking, are you? You're not dumb, you're just playing the part online as part of a self-reinforcing game you play with yourself in which you make yourself feel superior.
It's a rhetorical question for you, designed to prove a point. You've already arrived at your conclusion and you're arguing backwards.
Otherwise, why would you be deliberately obtuse about this?
See, I can ask rhetorical questions, too.
Here are my questions:
Do you really think DL and IP learning pose identical challenges and opportunities?
Is email the same as an in-person conversation? Is texting?
Why travel when you can see everything online?
Why go to restaurants when you can order out?
Why see family when you can zoom?
I'll tell you what. You go back to congratulating yourself on your perceived superiority -- I mean, your childrens' capacity to play online video games for hours a day is really quite an achievement -- and the rest of us will have a constructive discussion about the challenges posed to other, less video-game-successful students and how to meet them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
They are alone because their parents are...wait for it...working. The entire point is that parents cannot be home schooling, they have jobs.
I mean, they are alone because they are distance learning individually in their homes. Is that difficult to understand? Teens are pack animals. Just being in a group setting makes things easier for many of them.
We are choosing DL for our teens, but I don't think it's easy at all. And sadly I think that the attempts to basically replicate IP learning at home via the internet does a lot to expose the flaws in the system without leveraging the opportunities posed by DL. That will come, in due time. But in the meantime, it's going to be very challenging for all of us.
And, hey, if DL is easy for you and your family, then great! That is a good thing and I'm genuinely glad that a good option is open to you.
My kids are participating in pack activities online for hours a day. They're playing on line games with groups of other kids. How is this different?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
Because they are sitting alone in a room with a screen. They are also missing the teacher who is walking around the room telling them to stop talking and start working. They may have the zoom on, but that doesn't mean they are actually paying attention and tuning in.
In high school????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
They are alone because their parents are...wait for it...working. The entire point is that parents cannot be home schooling, they have jobs.
I mean, they are alone because they are distance learning individually in their homes. Is that difficult to understand? Teens are pack animals. Just being in a group setting makes things easier for many of them.
We are choosing DL for our teens, but I don't think it's easy at all. And sadly I think that the attempts to basically replicate IP learning at home via the internet does a lot to expose the flaws in the system without leveraging the opportunities posed by DL. That will come, in due time. But in the meantime, it's going to be very challenging for all of us.
And, hey, if DL is easy for you and your family, then great! That is a good thing and I'm genuinely glad that a good option is open to you.
Anonymous wrote:Why can't they just have the teachers in the classrooms with a camera live streaming the classes? It would just be like a regular class except students would be at home.
The kids could then cycle through each of their 8 periods each day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
Because they are sitting alone in a room with a screen. They are also missing the teacher who is walking around the room telling them to stop talking and start working. They may have the zoom on, but that doesn't mean they are actually paying attention and tuning in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP DL can work ok for HS and middle school, but it doesn't work for ES at all. The younger the kid, the more quickly they tune out, need redirection and engagement, socialization and physical help. What you are describing sounds ok for 16 year olds - and even then it will still not work well.
Similarly, younger kids can't be expected to safely social distance at school either. So the lesser of the two evils is the one that doesn't risk their lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?
They are alone because their parents are...wait for it...working. The entire point is that parents cannot be home schooling, they have jobs.
Anonymous wrote:You are missing the problem of special needs kids who require special services to be able to participate in classroom instruction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is boring enough for most MS and HS students as it is. In-person there are more stimuli and fewer choices. Plus there is peer pressure and teacher-pressure to tune in. So much harder at home, so much harder alone.
Why are they alone? Don't most parents make their kids go to school? How is this any different?