Anonymous wrote:Commenters should identify if they are a teacher or not. Because if you aren't, you have no actual idea. I am a teacher. DL will be much better, and that is the option I am picking for my HS student.
1. There will be synchronous (live) instruction 4 days out of 5, with attendance taken. Not optional office hours.
2. The county has curriculum writers working all summer to convert curriculum to Canvas. There are plenty of lessons learned and feedback from what worked and what didn't that is being incorporated.
3. Everyone will be using Canvas and there are a large variety of trainings to support teachers this summer. From the student side of things, courses will be structured in a similar fashion and the calendar will start to be useful because all the assignments will be there.
4. There will be a big emphasis on creating a classroom community via zoom, with different ways to get students to collaborate and participate in an online environment.
Will some classes and/or teachers be better than others? Of course. That is no different than in school. But if there are real problems, they should be able to be straightened out. At the HS and MS level, I really don't think that occasional in-person for each class is really going to be that much more beneficial than just having the consistency of 100% DL.
Anonymous wrote:One of my kids started summer classes today (just for "fun" -- i.e., I made him). They went smoothly and he seemed so interested I actually stuck my head in to make sure he wasn't playing a game with his friends. He wasn't.
He had two classes today and they went well. I think DL in the fall will be fine.
Anonymous wrote:In so many threads people make comments about how distant learning will be better in the upcoming school year than in the spring. They say spring was so bad because there was no time to prepare. What do you think MCPS is preparing now to ensure that it will be better next year? What concrete steps are being taken? Is the curriculum being modified to better fit DL, is the county preparing content and aids to help teachers in DL, are teachers receiving intensive training this summer? Or is the promise of more live zooms enough to convince you that it is going to better?
Do we have any real proof that it will be better, or is it just the same way of thinking as believing that the vaccine will be here in January?
Anonymous wrote:Commenters should identify if they are a teacher or not. Because if you aren't, you have no actual idea. I am a teacher. DL will be much better, and that is the option I am picking for my HS student.
1. There will be synchronous (live) instruction 4 days out of 5, with attendance taken. Not optional office hours.
2. The county has curriculum writers working all summer to convert curriculum to Canvas. There are plenty of lessons learned and feedback from what worked and what didn't that is being incorporated.
3. Everyone will be using Canvas and there are a large variety of trainings to support teachers this summer. From the student side of things, courses will be structured in a similar fashion and the calendar will start to be useful because all the assignments will be there.
4. There will be a big emphasis on creating a classroom community via zoom, with different ways to get students to collaborate and participate in an online environment.
Will some classes and/or teachers be better than others? Of course. That is no different than in school. But if there are real problems, they should be able to be straightened out. At the HS and MS level, I really don't think that occasional in-person for each class is really going to be that much more beneficial than just having the consistency of 100% DL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it will be better, I just think they'll be more of it. People want to delude themselves into thinking it will suffice until that safe, 100% effective vaccine magically appears for everyone in January 2021.
It was great last Spring. My kids got a lot out of it and the pace seemed better too.
Seriously? What grade?
I'm not the PP, but my 10th grader liked it a lot better than being in school and got a lot out of it. He could work at his own pace, what he needed to learn was really clear, and he was just generally more relaxed.
Meant 9th grader.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it will be better, I just think they'll be more of it. People want to delude themselves into thinking it will suffice until that safe, 100% effective vaccine magically appears for everyone in January 2021.
It was great last Spring. My kids got a lot out of it and the pace seemed better too.
Seriously? What grade?
I'm not the PP, but my 10th grader liked it a lot better than being in school and got a lot out of it. He could work at his own pace, what he needed to learn was really clear, and he was just generally more relaxed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it will be better, I just think they'll be more of it. People want to delude themselves into thinking it will suffice until that safe, 100% effective vaccine magically appears for everyone in January 2021.
It was great last Spring. My kids got a lot out of it and the pace seemed better too.
Seriously? What grade?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it will be better, I just think they'll be more of it. People want to delude themselves into thinking it will suffice until that safe, 100% effective vaccine magically appears for everyone in January 2021.
It was great last Spring. My kids got a lot out of it and the pace seemed better too.