Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is not even news anymore. People are so dumb. Let them eat corona.
The news is that the 9 year old 4th grader infected two adults.
Kids aren't supposed to be able to infect adults, or so they are saying on the schools threads.
Nobody is saying kids can’t infect adults - just that it’s much more rare as this chart shows.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is not even news anymore. People are so dumb. Let them eat corona.
The news is that the 9 year old 4th grader infected two adults.
Kids aren't supposed to be able to infect adults, or so they are saying on the schools threads.
I've been to several outdoor gatherings. One thing I've commonly observed is that people start talking about something and then "oh I have to show you this picture on my phone" and before you know it people are passing a phone and leaning in to see pictures when before they were standing many feet away from each other.
It's just so ingrained and natural in our culture now to pull out phones to share something that people don't even realize they are doing it.
Anonymous wrote:Is the assumption that all of those index cases were infected at the time of the party or they all got it from one family at the party?
Anonymous wrote:OP, you're ridiculous to interpret this as supporting that kids aren't spreaders.
Kids aren't around a lot of people these days.
This demonstrates that kids can infect people that they are in close continuous contact with, like grand-parents.
School is 12-20 kids and 1-3 adults in an enclosed room for over 4 hours a day. That's a lot of people, regardless of the face covering, shields, open windows and hand sanitizer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The title is misleading. It infected 14, which started a chain that infected 41 people—and let’s face probably a whole lot more by now.
The kids aren’t going to work. That’s maybe why they aren’t the big spreaders in the chart. But I wonder how the grandparents saw the kid without seeing the parents? Did they watch the kid while the parents were sick maybe?
And an adult passed it to their 17 year old child. Yes, people are stupid but their risk taking puts everyone at risk.
Anonymous wrote:Good for them. Freedom to do whatever they want is more important. Even if they die, they die free!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:
People just assume that the people they know don't have it -- only "strangers" are infectious. These family gatherings -- be they birthdays or funerals or whatever -- are as bad as bars being open. People want to get close. They end up sharing a lot of things (serving spoons), they shout b/c it's loud. Bad stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Fascinating diagram and study. Thanks for sharing, OP.
I would like to have more info about what the kids were doing -- particularly the ones who didn't spread it to anyone. Were they in daycare? Was the one child who spread it to the grandparents and elderly neighbor being baby-sat by the grandparents (longer sustained contact)?
People just assume that the people they know don't have it -- only "strangers" are infectious. These family gatherings -- be they birthdays or funerals or whatever -- are as bad as bars being open. People want to get close. They end up sharing a lot of things (serving spoons), they shout b/c it's loud. Bad stuff.
We need to go back to having NO social gatherings in homes or anywhere. You only socialize within your household or when you are 6 ft. away from someone outside your household. That plus masks everywhere will knock this out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good for them. Freedom to do whatever they want is more important. Even if they die, they die free!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Unfortunately, they are killing others in the process.
Anonymous wrote:The title is misleading. It infected 14, which started a chain that infected 41 people—and let’s face probably a whole lot more by now.
The kids aren’t going to work. That’s maybe why they aren’t the big spreaders in the chart. But I wonder how the grandparents saw the kid without seeing the parents? Did they watch the kid while the parents were sick maybe?