Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps your in laws, who are in their 70s have come to terms with how many years they may have left. And instead of spending the next year or however long it takes to have an effective vaccine in isolation, they are going to live their lives.
I actually completely understand that viewpoint.
Have you known anyone who had covid or was ventilated? You would not understand their viewpoint if you had. Covid is terrifying and unbelievably painful. To go on a ventilator you are put into a coma and adult diapers and put on your stomach. If you survive, the damage to your lungs is permanent.
In your 70s, 80s or 90s - this is not an illness you want to take you.
THIS is what I wish the media would report more on.
And to OP: stop seeing your in laws.
100% this. Some folks get it and die quickly. In a way that's lucky. A lot of others linger on a ventilator or in a cycle. My mother is one. 3.5 months in the hospital or other care facility. The first 3 weeks were on a ventilator. Then a tracheostomy -- they cut open your throat to make a hole for air to go through, so they can take the tube out and not further irritate the throat and lungs. You need special rehab to be able to talk after that. Weeks and weeks on a feeding tube. Near-endless cycles of improving and then relapsing. More stints on ventilator. Discharge to rehab. Then readmission. Rinse and repeat multiple times.
My mother's lungs are too damaged for her to manage to get out, but not so damaged that she'll die any time soon. She's completely awake and coherent and mentally herself, and thus completely aware of how dependent she is. She makes improvements like being able to walk with assistance to the bathroom and use the toilet by herself. (When prior to this she was independent.) Then 2 days later she'll have a relapse where her oxygen levels drop precipitously. She is 72.
This is not a live your life and then quickly die scenario. This is months of hell. Getting a haircut is not worth this. (Not saying that she got it that way. She contracted it before anyone advised wearing masks. Probably her daily grocery shopping.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps your in laws, who are in their 70s have come to terms with how many years they may have left. And instead of spending the next year or however long it takes to have an effective vaccine in isolation, they are going to live their lives.
I actually completely understand that viewpoint.
Have you known anyone who had covid or was ventilated? You would not understand their viewpoint if you had. Covid is terrifying and unbelievably painful. To go on a ventilator you are put into a coma and adult diapers and put on your stomach. If you survive, the damage to your lungs is permanent.
In your 70s, 80s or 90s - this is not an illness you want to take you.
THIS is what I wish the media would report more on.
And to OP: stop seeing your in laws.
Anonymous wrote:You’ve not named one thing that they are doing “wrong” besides not wearing a mask outside all the time and getting hair done once in a presumably legally-opened business. You are pregnant and hormonal - I get it - but you are acting like they are literally plotting to look themselves and everyone else around with their “risky” behavior.
I am sure you are going to the grocery store and all sorts of other things that put yourself at risk, not to even mention the nanny share. So why is it all on THEM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps your in laws, who are in their 70s have come to terms with how many years they may have left. And instead of spending the next year or however long it takes to have an effective vaccine in isolation, they are going to live their lives.
I actually completely understand that viewpoint.
Have you known anyone who had covid or was ventilated? You would not understand their viewpoint if you had. Covid is terrifying and unbelievably painful. To go on a ventilator you are put into a coma and adult diapers and put on your stomach. If you survive, the damage to your lungs is permanent.
In your 70s, 80s or 90s - this is not an illness you want to take you.
THIS is what I wish the media would report more on.
And to OP: stop seeing your in laws.
+1. And you suffer and die completely alone.
The first PP is a true idiot if she thinks people have come to terms with this as a way to end their lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps your in laws, who are in their 70s have come to terms with how many years they may have left. And instead of spending the next year or however long it takes to have an effective vaccine in isolation, they are going to live their lives.
I actually completely understand that viewpoint.
And wouldn't that all be fine and great if only they could potentially fall ill and/or die?
But NO, dear. No. They can give it to OP, to her husband, to her child. A 40something Broadway actor died the other day. Infants have died. A 5-year-old died. NO ONE is immune. Or, via getting it even with no symptoms from the grandparents, OP's child could pass it on to her daycare group. Do you get it?
If this was just old people willing to run the risk and live their lives, cool. But guess what? They end up in the ER with my 20something cousin taking care of them. They end up, asymptomatic, "socially distancing" at their church, where my sister is the pastor.
IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT OUR OWN RISK TOLERANCE, PEOPLE. I honestly don't get what you don't get about that.
Anonymous wrote:My in-laws are behaving similarly. So we don’t see them. It’s that simple.