Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:53
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Wow.
Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.
You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.
Still, they list the reporters and journalists working for Obama. Including Samantha Power, Jay Carney, and some other high profile people. And, while press sec, Carney's wife was with ABC.
Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires
The Hill is not a neutral source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/30/publishers-wife-played-undisclosed-role-for-melania-trump-345053
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:29
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Wow.
Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.
You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.
Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires
The Hill is not a neutral source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/30/publishers-wife-played-undisclosed-role-for-melania-trump-345053
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:29
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Wow.
Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.
DP. Beat me to it. So ironic.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:26
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Oh, please. She reports the news. And, is actually one of the few unbiassed reporters left.
I challenge you to find anything she has written that is not accurate.
Her job is not commentary - it is reporting. Clearly, you are more accustomed to "reporters" who provide their opinions and commentary.
Perhaps it is YOU, OP, with the issues and not her.
+100
Amazing that sticking to the facts, without the usual liberal bias, will get you labeled. "right wing".
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:16
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Wow.
Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.
You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.
Not unique, now is it?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/378628-trump-tv-pipeline-is-a-joke-next-to-obamas-media-hires
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:11
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Wow.
Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.
You realize the Fox News people went from Fox News into the Trump Administration. Not the other way around.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:10
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She can report the statement all she wants, but it is pretty clear at this point that reporting a statement uncritically or without context, which is something people like Wolf Blitzer have been doing for decades, is a disservice, because it is simply amplifying BS without context.
You, again, are used to reporters who provide opinion or commentary and don't just report the news.
In this case, all she did was parrot Ratcliffe, who lied to her. How is her amplifying Ratcliff's lies moving the ball forward, rather than just propaganda?
Anonymous
06/30/2020 11:02
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
She's a right wing tool.
In 2016 she gave the hacker Guccifer a platform to lie about hacking into Clinton's server, and she presented everything he said as fact. It was all lies.
https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-friends/fbis-clinton-email-findings-show-fox-got-played-running-imprisoned-hackers-lie
In 2016 she gave the hacker Guccifer a platform to lie about hacking into Clinton's server, and she presented everything he said as fact. It was all lies.
https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-friends/fbis-clinton-email-findings-show-fox-got-played-running-imprisoned-hackers-lie
Anonymous
06/30/2020 10:41
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
You people are insane. Look up the pamplateers of the 18th and 19th century in the USA.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 10:40
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Wow.
Maybe you should check out all the Obama administration people who work for CNN and MSNBC.
And, Acosta is such a great reporter, too. Totally unbiased.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 10:36
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
I hope someone will ask her about this. It is scare how sneaky and sleazy Fox News is. Before she gives a report it should be stated that she worked at Fox News. So people will know she is a part of the trump operation.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 10:34
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
You mean more like Fox News. She is a Fox News plant. Why would any reputable Media organization hire anyone who worked for Fox?
Anonymous
06/30/2020 09:56
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
She is more neutral than everyone else at CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN combined.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 09:39
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see how reporting Robert O'Brien's statement is in and of itself biased.
It defies common sense. John Bolton says Trump was briefed on the Russian bounties in 2019. Her bias is iin so willingly accepting O'Brien's statement withput question.
No, he didn't. Provide a citation for your claim.
If I do your work for you and provide the citation, can you stop being silly for one day?
https://apnews.com/425e43fa0ffdd6e126c5171653ec47d1
You have reading comprehension issues..... from your link:
"Bolton declined to comment Monday when asked by the AP if he had briefed Trump about the matter in 2019."
And it is customary to provide a citation when you make such a claim.
Hey you sillydoodle, from the same article:
"Then-national security adviser John Bolton also told colleagues he briefed Trump on the intelligence assessment in March 2019."
Just because he declined to comment on it yesterday, does not mean it did not happen. Out here in the real world, denial of reality does not change history.
This statement, of course, was according to anonymous sources.
If this is accurate, Bolton would have gone on the record. But, he didn't.
Anonymous
06/30/2020 09:30
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see how reporting Robert O'Brien's statement is in and of itself biased.
It defies common sense. John Bolton says Trump was briefed on the Russian bounties in 2019. Her bias is iin so willingly accepting O'Brien's statement withput question.
No, he didn't. Provide a citation for your claim.
If I do your work for you and provide the citation, can you stop being silly for one day?
https://apnews.com/425e43fa0ffdd6e126c5171653ec47d1
You have reading comprehension issues..... from your link:
"Bolton declined to comment Monday when asked by the AP if he had briefed Trump about the matter in 2019."
And it is customary to provide a citation when you make such a claim.
Hey you sillydoodle, from the same article:
"Then-national security adviser John Bolton also told colleagues he briefed Trump on the intelligence assessment in March 2019."
Just because he declined to comment on it yesterday, does not mean it did not happen. Out here in the real world, denial of reality does not change history.