Anonymous wrote:Where are all the DCUMers claiming young people can BARELY get infected?
Do you know what this means for Fall? DL until Spring 2021
Imagine if those 17 high schoolers were in class now for 14 days... spreading to staff and peers. Yeah, you can finish the story by yourself.
Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Anonymous wrote:If you don’t want your kids locked up, take them outside. They are your responsibility. Not the school’s. Hypothetical question here...... If schools flat out shut down and furloughed all the teachers, myself included, what would you do?You are going to have to start thinking creatively about this crisis like the rest of us. If you don’t care about my well being then why should I care about yours?
I also want to add that all the selfish people without the self control to practice social distancing are the ones who are spreading the disease and prolonging the spread.
Anonymous wrote:If you don’t want your kids locked up, take them outside. They are your responsibility. Not the school’s. Hypothetical question here...... If schools flat out shut down and furloughed all the teachers, myself included, what would you do?You are going to have to start thinking creatively about this crisis like the rest of us. If you don’t care about my well being then why should I care about yours?
I also want to add that all the selfish people without the self control to practice social distancing are the ones who are spreading the disease and prolonging the spread.
Anonymous wrote:Other parts of the world managed to lock and mask enough that they are really in better shape to open right now...not just the crazy denial we have here. I wish I was there!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Maybe, maybe not. But will all of the people they expose be fine? Most likely not. You can be alive without being "fine."
exactly the students may be fine - but they will infect others. who may not be fine. why don't people understand this?
I get it. But I also don’t think the kids should have stayed locked in their homes for a year. There is no simple answer. If it was my kid, I would hope that he practiced social distancing enough so that viral load was small.
Anonymous wrote:Other parts of the world managed to lock and mask enough that they are really in better shape to open right now...not just the crazy denial we have here. I wish I was there!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Maybe, maybe not. But will all of the people they expose be fine? Most likely not. You can be alive without being "fine."
exactly the students may be fine - but they will infect others. who may not be fine. why don't people understand this?
I get it. But I also don’t think the kids should have stayed locked in their homes for a year. There is no simple answer. If it was my kid, I would hope that he practiced social distancing enough so that viral load was small.
If what you stated above is true to the best of your ability and you’re cognitively sane and sound please do humanity a favor and cease any and all plans of reproduction. Holy fucCccc
What did I write that is so horrific? That I don’t think kids should be locked up for a year? Or are you accusing me of being wrong about viral load. I’m open-minded. Please enlighten me. Preferably without being so mean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Maybe, maybe not. But will all of the people they expose be fine? Most likely not. You can be alive without being "fine."
exactly the students may be fine - but they will infect others. who may not be fine. why don't people understand this?
I get it. But I also don’t think the kids should have stayed locked in their homes for a year. There is no simple answer. If it was my kid, I would hope that he practiced social distancing enough so that viral load was small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Maybe, maybe not. But will all of the people they expose be fine? Most likely not. You can be alive without being "fine."
exactly the students may be fine - but they will infect others. who may not be fine. why don't people understand this?
I get it. But I also don’t think the kids should have stayed locked in their homes for a year. There is no simple answer. If it was my kid, I would hope that he practiced social distancing enough so that viral load was small.
If what you stated above is true to the best of your ability and you’re cognitively sane and sound please do humanity a favor and cease any and all plans of reproduction. Holy fucCccc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Maybe, maybe not. But will all of the people they expose be fine? Most likely not. You can be alive without being "fine."
exactly the students may be fine - but they will infect others. who may not be fine. why don't people understand this?
I get it. But I also don’t think the kids should have stayed locked in their homes for a year. There is no simple answer. If it was my kid, I would hope that he practiced social distancing enough so that viral load was small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what I bet- every single one of them will be fine.
Maybe, maybe not. But will all of the people they expose be fine? Most likely not. You can be alive without being "fine."
exactly the students may be fine - but they will infect others. who may not be fine. why don't people understand this?