Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 11:04     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:I am sure that when DC its its first white mayor, in decades, none of the anti-Bowsers will have anything to complain about. The same DC government employees will be perofirming the exact same duties they perform now. The schools will be the same. The parks will be the same. The developers will give money to their candidate of choice. Clark, Douglas, W-T are going to do what they do. With more and more residents of DC relocated from the eurocentric racially homogenous regions of flyover country, the south, and NE, it is completely understandable that there is considerable hostility toward Mayor Bowser. The idea that she has done little or is corrupt is language that whites have been using for centuries to describe African-Americans. It is a mindset that is deeply ingrained in the consciousness of many white Americans that short of athletics and entertainment, Blacks have marginal added value to American society. For example, take how some whites denigrate Benjamin Banneker HS. The students at Banneker are enrolled in either IB, or AP tracks, work hard, and earn large number of scholarships each year. Nevertheless, you will have some white adults who, paid for ACT/SAT tutoring, kumon, or some other private tutoring for their child only to have them score negligibly higher than Banneker students, who did not receive private tutoring, on the ACT or SAT. Yet these same white adults will have the temerity to state that Banneker is below average. The more I type this, the more I am coming to realize that white supremacy is a mental defect. It would really be great if the anti-Bowser folks would just openly admit that there is nothing an African American could do to ever earn your respect. Admitting that sentiment would not only make you a racist, it would also make you honest. I can respect an honest racist because at least we can have dialogue. It is the dishonest, microagressing racist that I don't respect.


Are you projecting? Consider therapy. I have lived her for 20+ years, been white the entire time, and voted for William and Gray multiple times. Williams and, actually, Vincent Gray, were very good mayors. Fenty and Bowser were/are not. Painting the streets "Black Lives Matter" was impactful - but of course her budget called for a mass increase in police spending (50 million). So cheap optics, + unnecessary international travel during times of crisis + lots of ethical violations (check WaPo) is just not a great look. She wasn't a great ward representative - and she's not a great mayor, either.
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 10:45     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Whoa. So all whites should accept whatever the mayor does because she’s black?
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 10:38     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

I am sure that when DC its its first white mayor, in decades, none of the anti-Bowsers will have anything to complain about. The same DC government employees will be perofirming the exact same duties they perform now. The schools will be the same. The parks will be the same. The developers will give money to their candidate of choice. Clark, Douglas, W-T are going to do what they do. With more and more residents of DC relocated from the eurocentric racially homogenous regions of flyover country, the south, and NE, it is completely understandable that there is considerable hostility toward Mayor Bowser. The idea that she has done little or is corrupt is language that whites have been using for centuries to describe African-Americans. It is a mindset that is deeply ingrained in the consciousness of many white Americans that short of athletics and entertainment, Blacks have marginal added value to American society. For example, take how some whites denigrate Benjamin Banneker HS. The students at Banneker are enrolled in either IB, or AP tracks, work hard, and earn large number of scholarships each year. Nevertheless, you will have some white adults who, paid for ACT/SAT tutoring, kumon, or some other private tutoring for their child only to have them score negligibly higher than Banneker students, who did not receive private tutoring, on the ACT or SAT. Yet these same white adults will have the temerity to state that Banneker is below average. The more I type this, the more I am coming to realize that white supremacy is a mental defect. It would really be great if the anti-Bowser folks would just openly admit that there is nothing an African American could do to ever earn your respect. Admitting that sentiment would not only make you a racist, it would also make you honest. I can respect an honest racist because at least we can have dialogue. It is the dishonest, microagressing racist that I don't respect.
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 10:25     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most of the anti-Bowser sentiment on here boils down to the fact that she's talking about increasing density in Ward 3 (though so far, not actually done much to make it happen). If not for that, no one on DCUM would care much about her either way.


Some of us live in Ward 4 and experienced her poor stewardship firsthand.


She wasn't the mayor of Ward 4, so you really experienced Vince Gray or Adrian Fenty's poor stewardship.


That's not really how it works. We got previews to poor leadership of Fenty before he was mayor AND Bowser before she was mayor. Trust that we "experienced" them firsthand.


That is exactly how it works. The D.C. Council is a representative body, not an executive one.


Hardly! Council-members are in charge of constituent services. Are you arguing that council people cannot be poor at constituent services? Or poor stewards of public funds, e.g., by embezzling or misusing constituent services funds? Do you even live in DC?
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 09:54     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most of the anti-Bowser sentiment on here boils down to the fact that she's talking about increasing density in Ward 3 (though so far, not actually done much to make it happen). If not for that, no one on DCUM would care much about her either way.


Some of us live in Ward 4 and experienced her poor stewardship firsthand.


She wasn't the mayor of Ward 4, so you really experienced Vince Gray or Adrian Fenty's poor stewardship.


That's not really how it works. We got previews to poor leadership of Fenty before he was mayor AND Bowser before she was mayor. Trust that we "experienced" them firsthand.


That is exactly how it works. The D.C. Council is a representative body, not an executive one.
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 09:14     Subject: The Anti-Bower Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed by the anti-Bowser sentiments on these boards. I'm basically indifferent toward her but obviously some people have strong feelings against her. Why is that? I thought she's done a pretty good job with the current protests and managing the last few years (healthy budgets, no major scandals, etc).


Don’t listen much to the stuff above, there’s lots of misinformation in this thread.
(Keep in mind there are many conservatives here, and conservatives hate DC and want to attack it... and Bowser)


Bowser is fine, as you say. But she’s a former mid-level bureaucrat that still thinks with that mindset. She’s not a leader or a big thinker.
So little really gets done. Good example is with schools; DCPS plods along under her, ignoring the big changes that are needed due to the dramatic changes in school-age kids in the District.


On what world is that "fine"? Why should we accept mediocrity?
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 08:42     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I personally dislike her bc she’s been completely worthless on every type of traffic/pedestrian safety issue. She doesn’t walk, bike or take transit herself so she’s happy to let the 40% of us without a car be terrorized by rampaging MD drivers every day


She's like that on every other issue too.


This is the bureaucrat mentality.

This post article explains her well

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/muriel-bowser-trump-mural/2020/06/08/db2dcb2a-a8f3-11ea-94d2-d7bc43b26bf9_story.html
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 08:33     Subject: The Anti-Bower Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed by the anti-Bowser sentiments on these boards. I'm basically indifferent toward her but obviously some people have strong feelings against her. Why is that? I thought she's done a pretty good job with the current protests and managing the last few years (healthy budgets, no major scandals, etc).


Don’t listen much to the stuff above, there’s lots of misinformation in this thread.
(Keep in mind there are many conservatives here, and conservatives hate DC and want to attack it... and Bowser)


Bowser is fine, as you say. But she’s a former mid-level bureaucrat that still thinks with that mindset. She’s not a leader or a big thinker.
So little really gets done. Good example is with schools; DCPS plods along under her, ignoring the big changes that are needed due to the dramatic changes in school-age kids in the District.
Anonymous
Post 06/10/2020 07:58     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most of the anti-Bowser sentiment on here boils down to the fact that she's talking about increasing density in Ward 3 (though so far, not actually done much to make it happen). If not for that, no one on DCUM would care much about her either way.


Some of us live in Ward 4 and experienced her poor stewardship firsthand.


She wasn't the mayor of Ward 4, so you really experienced Vince Gray or Adrian Fenty's poor stewardship.


That's not really how it works. We got previews to poor leadership of Fenty before he was mayor AND Bowser before she was mayor. Trust that we "experienced" them firsthand.
Anonymous
Post 06/09/2020 21:09     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most of the anti-Bowser sentiment on here boils down to the fact that she's talking about increasing density in Ward 3 (though so far, not actually done much to make it happen). If not for that, no one on DCUM would care much about her either way.


Some of us live in Ward 4 and experienced her poor stewardship firsthand.


She wasn't the mayor of Ward 4, so you really experienced Vince Gray or Adrian Fenty's poor stewardship.
Anonymous
Post 06/09/2020 17:19     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:Most of the anti-Bowser sentiment on here boils down to the fact that she's talking about increasing density in Ward 3 (though so far, not actually done much to make it happen). If not for that, no one on DCUM would care much about her either way.


Some of us live in Ward 4 and experienced her poor stewardship firsthand.
Anonymous
Post 06/09/2020 16:56     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Most of the anti-Bowser sentiment on here boils down to the fact that she's talking about increasing density in Ward 3 (though so far, not actually done much to make it happen). If not for that, no one on DCUM would care much about her either way.
Anonymous
Post 06/09/2020 06:13     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Bowser could govern on autopilot during her first term -- her ethical missteps swept under the rug -- because the economy was humming along and crime was low. Neither is the case now, and now every move she makes will be magnified because of her new higher profile. Plus the fact that she's nearly out of friends on the Council, which is filling up with allies of her likely opponent in the next election (Racine).
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2020 23:06     Subject: Re:The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous
Post 06/08/2020 21:48     Subject: The Anti-Bowser Sentiments

Anonymous wrote:I personally dislike her bc she’s been completely worthless on every type of traffic/pedestrian safety issue. She doesn’t walk, bike or take transit herself so she’s happy to let the 40% of us without a car be terrorized by rampaging MD drivers every day


She's like that on every other issue too.