Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, poor showing for Guan, and Harris is doing better than expected. Looks like it's somewhat close between Dasgupta and Austin, though Dasgupta has a strong lead.
I'm surprised Dasgupta trails Harris so far, given he had the Apple Ballot (teachers union) endorsement. Guess they are losing clout.
Looks like votes in represent about 10% of registered voters so far. Lower than I expected.
I was surprised because I though Guan had raised a ton of money?
Does Dasgupta run against Harris if they are the top two?
If so, he will definitely win. All the votes not for Harris are people who want someone other than the incumbent, IMO. Plus, Dasgupta is a POC, which gives him an advantage in current MoCo.
Dasgupta would not have been my choice, but least Harris could be out.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, poor showing for Guan, and Harris is doing better than expected. Looks like it's somewhat close between Dasgupta and Austin, though Dasgupta has a strong lead.
I'm surprised Dasgupta trails Harris so far, given he had the Apple Ballot (teachers union) endorsement. Guess they are losing clout.
Looks like votes in represent about 10% of registered voters so far. Lower than I expected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Glad to see hateful Austin trailing.
As of last night, he'd received 8,826 mail votes and 428 in-person votes. That's not many more votes than he has Facebook "friends".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Glad to see hateful Austin trailing.
Hateful seems to have lost any meaning in the way you use it. Disagree with Austin, fine. Think he would be bad for MCPS, fine. But to say that he is a purveyor of hate because he disagrees with current progressive policy devalues the meaning of the word and lessens the impact when it is used against truly hateful people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Glad to see hateful Austin trailing.
Hateful seems to have lost any meaning in the way you use it. Disagree with Austin, fine. Think he would be bad for MCPS, fine. But to say that he is a purveyor of hate because he disagrees with current progressive policy devalues the meaning of the word and lessens the impact when it is used against truly hateful people.
Anonymous wrote:Glad to see hateful Austin trailing.
Anonymous wrote:It is sad all the way around, MCPS is failing our children, we need new insight and thoughts on how to move on from poor decisions and policies. MC had a chance for change and as always, the heads are in the sand and people listen to what an establishment, Apple Ballot, Washington Post, tells them instead of doing the research themselves. Think about it, you can find information about peoples online.
Also don't feed the madness that is currently going in our country and especially over the past several days. Mr. Austin is not a racist or person who hates blacks/brown or another race but is someone you disagree with and that is it unless you have first hand knowledge and not something you read in a paper/online or with 120 characters or less. Seriously, racism is an inherited trait but ignorance on the other hand is just individual thought.
Anonymous wrote:Glad to see hateful Austin trailing.
Anonymous wrote:Harris had the Washington Post endorsement.
Anonymous wrote:Glad to see hateful Austin trailing.