Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! When did DCUMs become 4Chan?!

Denying there is a problem with police and black people is pure racism.

I agree there is a problem with police and racism. (And racism extends to many other institutions, BTW.) I also think that looting & violent protest are wrong, and should be stopped. I also think that the police are in many/most cases instigating a lot of the violence.

Ok but you also know that Bowser is working on the problem? I had helicopters circling my house all night. People can protest. I agree they should not be looting but I’m sure you noticed the majority of looters and vandalizers arrested last night were not DC residents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! When did DCUMs become 4Chan?!

Denying there is a problem with police and black people is pure racism.

I agree there is a problem with police and racism. (And racism extends to many other institutions, BTW.) I also think that looting & violent protest are wrong, and should be stopped. I also think that the police are in many/most cases instigating a lot of the violence.

The violence in protests is coming from police.
Looting is damage to THINGS, not people.

If you really think you feel this way, I challenge you to say to one of your black or POC friends, outloud, "It is more important to stop damage to buildings than it is to uncomfortably and loudly protest against the murder of innocent black people." See how that goes over. See if that's actually how you really feel. I bet you don't, but if you do, you're hideous.

Anonymous wrote:Wow! When did DCUMs become 4Chan?!

Denying there is a problem with police and black people is pure racism.

Looting is unacceptable. Plain and simple.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care why they are looting or rioting. Don’t care. I am glad they are going to do something in DC.

Same.

LOL like trump or his lackies are competent enough to stop anything.

Anonymous wrote:Wow! When did DCUMs become 4Chan?!

Denying there is a problem with police and black people is pure racism.

I agree there is a problem with police and racism. (And racism extends to many other institutions, BTW.) I also think that looting & violent protest are wrong, and should be stopped. I also think that the police are in many/most cases instigating a lot of the violence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a call to governors, Trump said,

'You've got to arrest people, you have to track people, you have to put them in jail for 10 years and you'll never see this stuff again,' Trump said during the call, according to the Associated Press. 'We're doing it in Washington, D.C. We´re going to do something that people haven't seen before.'

What?! Omg! As a DC resident, what is he going to do?!

Muriel Bowser is in charge of MPD, not the president.

Yes but he also met with Barr. I’m concerned that they will do some horrible sentencing since many crimes are felonies in DC because it isn’t a state.

So you prefer for the looting and fires to continue ?

You’re so stupid.

I’m stupid because I don’t want looting to continue? I don’t want our city to be destroyed?

This is exactly why we have Trump supporters. You’re more concerned with politics than actually addressing the problem. If the mayor can’t control riots then the federal government needs to step in.

No, you’re stupid because you think people want looting. No one wants looting. No one wants cities destroyed. You fail to address the underlying and reoccurring problem, so therefore you get angry protests.

Or I could turn it around and say you want looting, violence, and the cities destroyed because you never solve the problem of police murdering black people.

White people cant solve this problem. Simply reduce criminal activity amongst blacks and you’ll have less policing to begin with. Even the man murdered the other day was committing a crime.

White people (white police officers) can start by not murdering AA/black men. Easy peasy! They could actually do their jobs properly!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a call to governors, Trump said,

'You've got to arrest people, you have to track people, you have to put them in jail for 10 years and you'll never see this stuff again,' Trump said during the call, according to the Associated Press. 'We're doing it in Washington, D.C. We´re going to do something that people haven't seen before.'

What?! Omg! As a DC resident, what is he going to do?!

Muriel Bowser is in charge of MPD, not the president.

Yes but he also met with Barr. I’m concerned that they will do some horrible sentencing since many crimes are felonies in DC because it isn’t a state.

So you prefer for the looting and fires to continue ?

You’re so stupid.

I’m stupid because I don’t want looting to continue? I don’t want our city to be destroyed?

This is exactly why we have Trump supporters. You’re more concerned with politics than actually addressing the problem. If the mayor can’t control riots then the federal government needs to step in.

No, you’re stupid because you think people want looting. No one wants looting. No one wants cities destroyed. You fail to address the underlying and reoccurring problem, so therefore you get angry protests.

Or I could turn it around and say you want looting, violence, and the cities destroyed because you never solve the problem of police murdering black people.

Call me all the names you want. I care about the safety of dc residents. If Trump can get this madness to stop then more power to him. Bowser has failed.

Trump is the reason for this madness. And his inability to lead is making it so much worse.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care why they are looting or rioting. Don’t care. I am glad they are going to do something in DC.

Same.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care why they are looting or rioting. Don’t care. I am glad they are going to do something in DC.

That's the problem, moron. You did not care until they started rioting and looting. See the effectiveness now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a call to governors, Trump said,

'You've got to arrest people, you have to track people, you have to put them in jail for 10 years and you'll never see this stuff again,' Trump said during the call, according to the Associated Press. 'We're doing it in Washington, D.C. We´re going to do something that people haven't seen before.'

What?! Omg! As a DC resident, what is he going to do?!

Muriel Bowser is in charge of MPD, not the president.

Yes but he also met with Barr. I’m concerned that they will do some horrible sentencing since many crimes are felonies in DC because it isn’t a state.

So you prefer for the looting and fires to continue ?

You’re so stupid.

I’m stupid because I don’t want looting to continue? I don’t want our city to be destroyed?

This is exactly why we have Trump supporters. You’re more concerned with politics than actually addressing the problem. If the mayor can’t control riots then the federal government needs to step in.

No, you’re stupid because you think people want looting. No one wants looting. No one wants cities destroyed. You fail to address the underlying and reoccurring problem, so therefore you get angry protests.

Or I could turn it around and say you want looting, violence, and the cities destroyed because you never solve the problem of police murdering black people.

THIS THIS THIS X 10000 Jesus, you people miss the forest for the trees. Maybe address the reason behind WHY people resort to rioting (which then inevitably devolves in to looting by all sorts of characters, not just "the black people") and you wouldn't have to worry about this. But of course you're only concerned now because the rioting and looting might hurt your property values or ability to shop.

So overnight we are supposed to address lack of employment opportunities, lack of education and out of wedlock births?

Alternatively we could just arrest looters.

We have to start somewhere because whatever we've done in the past clearly is not working. I do agree with arresting the looters (obviously).

Wow! When did DCUMs become 4Chan?!

Denying there is a problem with police and black people is pure racism.

I don’t care why they are looting or rioting. Don’t care. I am glad they are going to do something in DC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a call to governors, Trump said,

'You've got to arrest people, you have to track people, you have to put them in jail for 10 years and you'll never see this stuff again,' Trump said during the call, according to the Associated Press. 'We're doing it in Washington, D.C. We´re going to do something that people haven't seen before.'

What?! Omg! As a DC resident, what is he going to do?!

Muriel Bowser is in charge of MPD, not the president.

Yes but he also met with Barr. I’m concerned that they will do some horrible sentencing since many crimes are felonies in DC because it isn’t a state.

So you prefer for the looting and fires to continue ?

You’re so stupid.

I’m stupid because I don’t want looting to continue? I don’t want our city to be destroyed?

This is exactly why we have Trump supporters. You’re more concerned with politics than actually addressing the problem. If the mayor can’t control riots then the federal government needs to step in.

No, you’re stupid because you think people want looting. No one wants looting. No one wants cities destroyed. You fail to address the underlying and reoccurring problem, so therefore you get angry protests.

Or I could turn it around and say you want looting, violence, and the cities destroyed because you never solve the problem of police murdering black people.

THIS THIS THIS X 10000 Jesus, you people miss the forest for the trees. Maybe address the reason behind WHY people resort to rioting (which then inevitably devolves in to looting by all sorts of characters, not just "the black people") and you wouldn't have to worry about this. But of course you're only concerned now because the rioting and looting might hurt your property values or ability to shop.

So overnight we are supposed to address lack of employment opportunities, lack of education and out of wedlock births?

Alternatively we could just arrest looters.

Anonymous wrote:Good!!! They need to arrest looters. These poor small businesses!

If they had moved quickly and arrested that murdering thug of a policeman all this would have been avoided. You republicans are just not law and order types. So glad you will be swept aside by history. What a complete utter failure as a president. I just do not see republicans recovering from this ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a call to governors, Trump said,

'You've got to arrest people, you have to track people, you have to put them in jail for 10 years and you'll never see this stuff again,' Trump said during the call, according to the Associated Press. 'We're doing it in Washington, D.C. We´re going to do something that people haven't seen before.'

What?! Omg! As a DC resident, what is he going to do?!

Muriel Bowser is in charge of MPD, not the president.

Yes but he also met with Barr. I’m concerned that they will do some horrible sentencing since many crimes are felonies in DC because it isn’t a state.

So you prefer for the looting and fires to continue ?

You’re so stupid.

I’m stupid because I don’t want looting to continue? I don’t want our city to be destroyed?

This is exactly why we have Trump supporters. You’re more concerned with politics than actually addressing the problem. If the mayor can’t control riots then the federal government needs to step in.

No, you’re stupid because you think people want looting. No one wants looting. No one wants cities destroyed. You fail to address the underlying and reoccurring problem, so therefore you get angry protests.

Or I could turn it around and say you want looting, violence, and the cities destroyed because you never solve the problem of police murdering black people.

THIS THIS THIS X 10000 Jesus, you people miss the forest for the trees. Maybe address the reason behind WHY people resort to rioting (which then inevitably devolves in to looting by all sorts of characters, not just "the black people") and you wouldn't have to worry about this. But of course you're only concerned now because the rioting and looting might hurt your property values or ability to shop.