Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Just entice teachers with money like essential workers!! $13/hr extra is a lot of money.
Then those who wouldn't have stayed will unless it's 100% a health issue.
If there aren't enough teachers that'll mean even LESS learning. People do realize this right??
People don't actually care. They need somewhere to warehouse and occupy their kids while they work. The learning is secondary. And I'm not saying that in a disparaging way. Schools serve a double function and our society and economy become structured on that.
Really? Isn’t that only apply for k-2 grades. My 3rd grader is fine all day home if I make some sandwiches and give them the tv remote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Just entice teachers with money like essential workers!! $13/hr extra is a lot of money.
Then those who wouldn't have stayed will unless it's 100% a health issue.
If there aren't enough teachers that'll mean even LESS learning. People do realize this right??
People don't actually care. They need somewhere to warehouse and occupy their kids while they work. The learning is secondary. And I'm not saying that in a disparaging way. Schools serve a double function and our society and economy become structured on that.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Just entice teachers with money like essential workers!! $13/hr extra is a lot of money.
Then those who wouldn't have stayed will unless it's 100% a health issue.
If there aren't enough teachers that'll mean even LESS learning. People do realize this right??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Just entice teachers with money like essential workers!! $13/hr extra is a lot of money.
Then those who wouldn't have stayed will unless it's 100% a health issue.
If there aren't enough teachers that'll mean even LESS learning. People do realize this right??
People don't actually care. They need somewhere to warehouse and occupy their kids while they work. The learning is secondary. And I'm not saying that in a disparaging way. Schools serve a double function and our society and economy become structured on that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Just entice teachers with money like essential workers!! $13/hr extra is a lot of money.
Then those who wouldn't have stayed will unless it's 100% a health issue.
If there aren't enough teachers that'll mean even LESS learning. People do realize this right??
People don't actually care. They need somewhere to warehouse and occupy their kids while they work. The learning is secondary. And I'm not saying that in a disparaging way. Schools serve a double function and our society and economy become structured on that.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh. Just entice teachers with money like essential workers!! $13/hr extra is a lot of money.
Then those who wouldn't have stayed will unless it's 100% a health issue.
If there aren't enough teachers that'll mean even LESS learning. People do realize this right??
Anonymous wrote:Schools will not be open in the Fall.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a way to read that article without paying for a subscription?
I'm a teacher and very worried about the number of teachers who won't or can't return. We had a terrible year this past year with several first year teachers in our building. One got fired, one quit on her own accord and the 3rd made it to the end of the year but isn't returning. Our students in those classes didn't learn much and between that and the school closures, we're going to have a whole lot of kids who basically lost out on a whole year's worth of instruction. We "had" all those openings filled with experienced, good teachers for next year, back in March. But now, I don't know if that is going to be the case.
Anonymous wrote:I have a rising third grader. If there is a schedule where I need to work 5 days a week and he is only going 2 days I will probably be one of the teachers who doesn't return.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a way to read that article without paying for a subscription?
I'm a teacher and very worried about the number of teachers who won't or can't return. We had a terrible year this past year with several first year teachers in our building. One got fired, one quit on her own accord and the 3rd made it to the end of the year but isn't returning. Our students in those classes didn't learn much and between that and the school closures, we're going to have a whole lot of kids who basically lost out on a whole year's worth of instruction. We "had" all those openings filled with experienced, good teachers for next year, back in March. But now, I don't know if that is going to be the case.
Anonymous wrote:I bet there would be zero attrition for another round of distance “learning”...