Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on the school.
Economics majors at the vast majority of universities is terrible. It's basically a major for students that cannot excel in any other subject and want something vaguely "technical" for jobs.
For schools with an undergrad business school that requires applying to get into, always go with Finance, and only Economics if Economics is also within the business school (i.e. at Wharton, not the liberal arts college at Penn). At these schools, Economics majors are basically kids who couldn't get into STEM or the business school.
At the Ivies without business schools, generally the Economics major is chosen by kids that would've otherwise done finance. But
even at Harvard and MIT, the Economics majors are relatively bad compared to other majors.
It's a cash cow program, basically.
Very bias view of the Ivies... really bad advice. Econ majors from Ivy League and top Liberal Arts colleges get first dibs at most undergraduate finance, tech and business jobs. They make a lot of $$$ and more than most finance majors coming out of undergrad business schools. Check out feeder schools and majors at Poets & Quants.
No they don't, Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors get first dibs at finance jobs and Engineering/CS/Math/Physics grads get first dibs at tech jobs (why would Economics majors get looked at for tech jobs...?)
What is true is that many Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors don't plan to work for Finance/Business, the firms hire the few who do and the rest falls to Econ grads, because students interested in finance/business do Econ in those schools.
The reason that Ivy Econ grads make more than Finance undergrad B-school grads is because of the Ivy branding, not the Econ degree. Ivy grads could do History and make as much doing management consulting
Depends on the applicant’s other qualities... if it’s I-banking, the first crack is going to go to the varsity athlete who majored in Econ or Government.
...That's entirely untrue. Why would Government majors be sought for investment banking? Unless its for government relations, or for management consulting jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on the school.
Economics majors at the vast majority of universities is terrible. It's basically a major for students that cannot excel in any other subject and want something vaguely "technical" for jobs.
For schools with an undergrad business school that requires applying to get into, always go with Finance, and only Economics if Economics is also within the business school (i.e. at Wharton, not the liberal arts college at Penn). At these schools, Economics majors are basically kids who couldn't get into STEM or the business school.
At the Ivies without business schools, generally the Economics major is chosen by kids that would've otherwise done finance. But
even at Harvard and MIT, the Economics majors are relatively bad compared to other majors.
It's a cash cow program, basically.
Very bias view of the Ivies... really bad advice. Econ majors from Ivy League and top Liberal Arts colleges get first dibs at most undergraduate finance, tech and business jobs. They make a lot of $$$ and more than most finance majors coming out of undergrad business schools. Check out feeder schools and majors at Poets & Quants.
No they don't, Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors get first dibs at finance jobs and Engineering/CS/Math/Physics grads get first dibs at tech jobs (why would Economics majors get looked at for tech jobs...?)
What is true is that many Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors don't plan to work for Finance/Business, the firms hire the few who do and the rest falls to Econ grads, because students interested in finance/business do Econ in those schools.
The reason that Ivy Econ grads make more than Finance undergrad B-school grads is because of the Ivy branding, not the Econ degree. Ivy grads could do History and make as much doing management consulting
Depends on the applicant’s other qualities... if it’s I-banking, the first crack is going to go to the varsity athlete who majored in Econ or Government.
...That's entirely untrue. Why would Government majors be sought for investment banking? Unless its for government relations, or for management consulting jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on the school.
Economics majors at the vast majority of universities is terrible. It's basically a major for students that cannot excel in any other subject and want something vaguely "technical" for jobs.
For schools with an undergrad business school that requires applying to get into, always go with Finance, and only Economics if Economics is also within the business school (i.e. at Wharton, not the liberal arts college at Penn). At these schools, Economics majors are basically kids who couldn't get into STEM or the business school.
At the Ivies without business schools, generally the Economics major is chosen by kids that would've otherwise done finance. But
even at Harvard and MIT, the Economics majors are relatively bad compared to other majors.
It's a cash cow program, basically.
Very bias view of the Ivies... really bad advice. Econ majors from Ivy League and top Liberal Arts colleges get first dibs at most undergraduate finance, tech and business jobs. They make a lot of $$$ and more than most finance majors coming out of undergrad business schools. Check out feeder schools and majors at Poets & Quants.
No they don't, Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors get first dibs at finance jobs and Engineering/CS/Math/Physics grads get first dibs at tech jobs (why would Economics majors get looked at for tech jobs...?)
What is true is that many Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors don't plan to work for Finance/Business, the firms hire the few who do and the rest falls to Econ grads, because students interested in finance/business do Econ in those schools.
The reason that Ivy Econ grads make more than Finance undergrad B-school grads is because of the Ivy branding, not the Econ degree. Ivy grads could do History and make as much doing management consulting
Depends on the applicant’s other qualities... if it’s I-banking, the first crack is going to go to the varsity athlete who majored in Econ or Government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Economics is actually a very difficult degree at most colleges, so I am not sure where many of these posters are coming from. The easy path is the “business” or “management” type majors.
My Econ major kid has to take almost as much math as a math major in addition to all of the econ requirements...
Calc 1,2, and 3
Three semesters of statistics
Linear Algebra
2 semesters of Computer Programming
My kid is double majoring in epidemiology, so is also taking biostat and all of the requirements for that degree. Thinking about a career in health economics, but could go either way.
What school is this? The vast majority of schools don't require Calculus 3, Linear Algebra, computer programming or more than 1 semester of statistics. There are some 'top' schools that don't even require Calculus 2 for Econ majors.
Regardless, those courses are basic introductory courses for STEM majors, but would be considered above-and-beyond for an Econ major, which shows the kind of degree that Econ is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to a school where the business school is a separate college, it matters. This usually applies to big state universities. At some schools Econ is in the college of arts and sciences, which is usually less selective than the undergrad business college (where finance) is. So it depends on your kid’s interests. I would investigate the differences between Econ and finance (as subjects, not employment prospects).
I’d argue you have it exactly backwards. The “real” economics majors, those who take high level math like multivariable calc, linear algebra, probability, econometrics, real analysis, generally are in A&S. It’s also much more difficult than the B-school variety of Econ.
Anyone can take those classes if they like, and they are definitely not required for an Econ major.
They are for a mathematical Econ major, which is the point of the distinction. Econ is a cake major. Math Econ is not.
Anonymous wrote:Law vs. MBA are pretty different long-term career paths. What is it about Econ that got your kid excited? That matters a lot to which school and major to pick. Not to mention, most kids change their minds at least somewhat after being exposed to a breadth of subjects in college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to a school where the business school is a separate college, it matters. This usually applies to big state universities. At some schools Econ is in the college of arts and sciences, which is usually less selective than the undergrad business college (where finance) is. So it depends on your kid’s interests. I would investigate the differences between Econ and finance (as subjects, not employment prospects).
I’d argue you have it exactly backwards. The “real” economics majors, those who take high level math like multivariable calc, linear algebra, probability, econometrics, real analysis, generally are in A&S. It’s also much more difficult than the B-school variety of Econ.
Anyone can take those classes if they like, and they are definitely not required for an Econ major.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on the school.
Economics majors at the vast majority of universities is terrible. It's basically a major for students that cannot excel in any other subject and want something vaguely "technical" for jobs.
For schools with an undergrad business school that requires applying to get into, always go with Finance, and only Economics if Economics is also within the business school (i.e. at Wharton, not the liberal arts college at Penn). At these schools, Economics majors are basically kids who couldn't get into STEM or the business school.
At the Ivies without business schools, generally the Economics major is chosen by kids that would've otherwise done finance. But
even at Harvard and MIT, the Economics majors are relatively bad compared to other majors.
It's a cash cow program, basically.
Very bias view of the Ivies... really bad advice. Econ majors from Ivy League and top Liberal Arts colleges get first dibs at most undergraduate finance, tech and business jobs. They make a lot of $$$ and more than most finance majors coming out of undergrad business schools. Check out feeder schools and majors at Poets & Quants.
No they don't, Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors get first dibs at finance jobs and Engineering/CS/Math/Physics grads get first dibs at tech jobs (why would Economics majors get looked at for tech jobs...?)
What is true is that many Math/Physics/Engineering/CS majors don't plan to work for Finance/Business, the firms hire the few who do and the rest falls to Econ grads, because students interested in finance/business do Econ in those schools.
The reason that Ivy Econ grads make more than Finance undergrad B-school grads is because of the Ivy branding, not the Econ degree. Ivy grads could do History and make as much doing management consulting
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to a school where the business school is a separate college, it matters. This usually applies to big state universities. At some schools Econ is in the college of arts and sciences, which is usually less selective than the undergrad business college (where finance) is. So it depends on your kid’s interests. I would investigate the differences between Econ and finance (as subjects, not employment prospects).
I’d argue you have it exactly backwards. The “real” economics majors, those who take high level math like multivariable calc, linear algebra, probability, econometrics, real analysis, generally are in A&S. It’s also much more difficult than the B-school variety of Econ.
Anonymous wrote:Economics is actually a very difficult degree at most colleges, so I am not sure where many of these posters are coming from. The easy path is the “business” or “management” type majors.
My Econ major kid has to take almost as much math as a math major in addition to all of the econ requirements...
Calc 1,2, and 3
Three semesters of statistics
Linear Algebra
2 semesters of Computer Programming
My kid is double majoring in epidemiology, so is also taking biostat and all of the requirements for that degree. Thinking about a career in health economics, but could go either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to a school where the business school is a separate college, it matters. This usually applies to big state universities. At some schools Econ is in the college of arts and sciences, which is usually less selective than the undergrad business college (where finance) is. So it depends on your kid’s interests. I would investigate the differences between Econ and finance (as subjects, not employment prospects).
I’d argue you have it exactly backwards. The “real” economics majors, those who take high level math like multivariable calc, linear algebra, probability, econometrics, real analysis, generally are in A&S. It’s also much more difficult than the B-school variety of Econ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on the school.
Economics majors at the vast majority of universities is terrible. It's basically a major for students that cannot excel in any other subject and want something vaguely "technical" for jobs.
For schools with an undergrad business school that requires applying to get into, always go with Finance, and only Economics if Economics is also within the business school (i.e. at Wharton, not the liberal arts college at Penn). At these schools, Economics majors are basically kids who couldn't get into STEM or the business school.
At the Ivies without business schools, generally the Economics major is chosen by kids that would've otherwise done finance. But
even at Harvard and MIT, the Economics majors are relatively bad compared to other majors.
It's a cash cow program, basically.
Very bias view of the Ivies... really bad advice. Econ majors from Ivy League and top Liberal Arts colleges get first dibs at most undergraduate finance, tech and business jobs. They make a lot of $$$ and more than most finance majors coming out of undergrad business schools. Check out feeder schools and majors at Poets & Quants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on the school.
Economics majors at the vast majority of universities is terrible. It's basically a major for students that cannot excel in any other subject and want something vaguely "technical" for jobs.
For schools with an undergrad business school that requires applying to get into, always go with Finance, and only Economics if Economics is also within the business school (i.e. at Wharton, not the liberal arts college at Penn). At these schools, Economics majors are basically kids who couldn't get into STEM or the business school.
At the Ivies without business schools, generally the Economics major is chosen by kids that would've otherwise done finance. But
even at Harvard and MIT, the Economics majors are relatively bad compared to other majors.
It's a cash cow program, basically.
I agree with your points. But you could say the same about entrepreneurship, marketing, communications, and sociology majors (the easy sounding majors) but you’d be wrong. They get jobs. Not $$$ jobs, but jobs nonetheless.