Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Considering it’s a white dude harassing a black delivery driver, I think this is more than just “who gave you the code”.
Well, only if you attribute everything to racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Considering it’s a white dude harassing a black delivery driver, I think this is more than just “who gave you the code”.
Well, only if you attribute everything to racism.
Anonymous wrote:Considering it’s a white dude harassing a black delivery driver, I think this is more than just “who gave you the code”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you need a code to get in and out? Some communities will let you out without a code, my Mom's community does this.. We don't know if the customer met him at the gate to let him in.
We’d know if he would have said so. Instead he wanted to be a "victim"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The guy was in a gated community and they wanted to know who gave him the code. Seems reasonable if giving out the code is against the HOA rules. They wanted to know who in the community decided they were above the rules, it has nothing to do with the driver himself.
A good idea would be to find out who had the package delivered and not commit the tort of false imprisonment.
Read the article. They asked who he delivered to, he refused to say. They were wrong for blocking him in, but "I delivered to 1234 x street" and it would have been over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The HOA people can be crazy. I was yelled at by an HOA member in my not-gated community park, saying that he does not know me which means I am trespassing.
And are you a person of color, perchance? Or somehow "different"?
Anonymous wrote:The HOA people can be crazy. I was yelled at by an HOA member in my not-gated community park, saying that he does not know me which means I am trespassing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The guy was in a gated community and they wanted to know who gave him the code. Seems reasonable if giving out the code is against the HOA rules. They wanted to know who in the community decided they were above the rules, it has nothing to do with the driver himself.
A good idea would be to find out who had the package delivered and not commit the tort of false imprisonment.
Read the article. They asked who he delivered to, he refused to say. They were wrong for blocking him in, but "I delivered to 1234 x street" and it would have been over.
The driver did the right thing and not give that information to those strangers for all he knows they don’t live there either, let me find out my neighbor down the street is harassing the FedEx dude to get my address and then going to come up and question me about my deliveries, that’s your a**.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The guy was in a gated community and they wanted to know who gave him the code. Seems reasonable if giving out the code is against the HOA rules. They wanted to know who in the community decided they were above the rules, it has nothing to do with the driver himself.
A good idea would be to find out who had the package delivered and not commit the tort of false imprisonment.
Read the article. They asked who he delivered to, he refused to say. They were wrong for blocking him in, but "I delivered to 1234 x street" and it would have been over.
Anonymous wrote:The guy was in a gated community and they wanted to know who gave him the code. Seems reasonable if giving out the code is against the HOA rules. They wanted to know who in the community decided they were above the rules, it has nothing to do with the driver himself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you need a code to get in and out? Some communities will let you out without a code, my Mom's community does this.. We don't know if the customer met him at the gate to let him in.
We’d know if he would have said so. Instead he wanted to be a "victim"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The guy was in a gated community and they wanted to know who gave him the code. Seems reasonable if giving out the code is against the HOA rules. They wanted to know who in the community decided they were above the rules, it has nothing to do with the driver himself.
A good idea would be to find out who had the package delivered and not commit the tort of false imprisonment.