Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are not a lawyer, steer clear of the SEC.
Everyone, from HR to IT and everyone in between, gets the pay bump. Not sure why people should steer clear of that. Accountants make the same as lawyers, even though private sector salaries are usually lower, so not sure why they would avoid it either.
I wasn’t referring to the salary. It’s just if you’re not a lawyer, you will have no clout at the SEC.
Depend on the office. Accountants do ok in the Office of the Chief Accountant. I don’t think HR or IT people have any less clout at the SEC than they do elsewhere. They have clout in their spheres and not elsewhere.
The SEC has more lawyers and more legal focused offices, but that’s just the nature of the work. There aren’t legions of program officers like in some places.
Finally, although you weren’t talking about money, I was. Even if you are right that non-lawyers have less clout, the significantly increased pay salves a lot of wounds. Most people aren’t going to “steer clear” of a big pay bump because of less clout.
Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind the raises run on a different schedule than for the GaS scale- April rather than January.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are not a lawyer, steer clear of the SEC.
Everyone, from HR to IT and everyone in between, gets the pay bump. Not sure why people should steer clear of that. Accountants make the same as lawyers, even though private sector salaries are usually lower, so not sure why they would avoid it either.
I wasn’t referring to the salary. It’s just if you’re not a lawyer, you will have no clout at the SEC.
Depend on the office. Accountants do ok in the Office of the Chief Accountant. I don’t think HR or IT people have any less clout at the SEC than they do elsewhere. They have clout in their spheres and not elsewhere.
The SEC has more lawyers and more legal focused offices, but that’s just the nature of the work. There aren’t legions of program officers like in some places.
Finally, although you weren’t talking about money, I was. Even if you are right that non-lawyers have less clout, the significantly increased pay salves a lot of wounds. Most people aren’t going to “steer clear” of a big pay bump because of less clout.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are not a lawyer, steer clear of the SEC.
Everyone, from HR to IT and everyone in between, gets the pay bump. Not sure why people should steer clear of that. Accountants make the same as lawyers, even though private sector salaries are usually lower, so not sure why they would avoid it either.
I wasn’t referring to the salary. It’s just if you’re not a lawyer, you will have no clout at the SEC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are not a lawyer, steer clear of the SEC.
Everyone, from HR to IT and everyone in between, gets the pay bump. Not sure why people should steer clear of that. Accountants make the same as lawyers, even though private sector salaries are usually lower, so not sure why they would avoid it either.
MagicBeans wrote:OP here. That was way faster than a couple weeks, but I can now confirm the offer is higher than my current pay, even if just a bit. I was admittedly hoping for a massive pay bump due to the SK-14 pay band having such a higher limit, but I am extremely relieved I won't have to take a paycut. Thanks for everyone's feedback.
Anonymous wrote:I can imagine that some prior Big Law folks would be turned off by the SEC's salary structure and bureaucracy, for it's a big bump for almost any current Fed who is coming from a GS structure.
Anonymous wrote:If you are not a lawyer, steer clear of the SEC.