Anonymous wrote:A lot of money gets spend on “extras” throughout the year, such as shirts for staff, lunch for staff for PD and holidays, etc. I think all of that will be cut out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents can pay for sports if they want to opt their kids into them. If there isn’t enough demand, then it doesn’t happen. There you go! Capitalism.
And support staff can get jobs elsewhere. Not sure what your point is.
Anonymous wrote:Parents can pay for sports if they want to opt their kids into them. If there isn’t enough demand, then it doesn’t happen. There you go! Capitalism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And that's exactly the opposite of what I hope. Kids learn so much from participating on sports teams. It is a true value-added activity.Anonymous wrote:I hope schools cut the heck out of sports.
America is one of the only countries in the world where sports are integrated into public education. We could save billions of dollars by not funding sports teams in public schools.
For that matter, we could save billions of dollar by not funding science, too. Your line of reasoning doesn't work. Physical education is an essential part of the curriculum. There is no way to justify not funding physical education and sports in schools. Enrichment types of classes, like music, art and drama, although nice to have, would need to be not funded first. Priorities, people, priorities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And that's exactly the opposite of what I hope. Kids learn so much from participating on sports teams. It is a true value-added activity.Anonymous wrote:I hope schools cut the heck out of sports.
America is one of the only countries in the world where sports are integrated into public education. We could save billions of dollars by not funding sports teams in public schools.
Anonymous wrote:And that's exactly the opposite of what I hope. Kids learn so much from participating on sports teams. It is a true value-added activity.Anonymous wrote:I hope schools cut the heck out of sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Things like languages in lower grades, buses for sports, in addition to some sports themselves.
A lot depends on whether and how long kids will physically be in the schools.
Buses for sports? We do not have those in our MCPS MS or our HS. Parents (and 11th and 12th graders with driver's licenses and cars) have to drive the athletes.
They have them here in our pwcs schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think all our TA's are going to lose their jobs. And the coaches. And the librarians. And a bunch of people at central office. And some of the front office secretaries. I don't think any of the specials teachers will survive or if they do, it'll be 10% of normal staffing. I also think class sizes are going to increase and many young teachers are going to lose their jobs. I suspect that if not this fall, then next, school districts will lose 50% of their funding.
If people think things are bad now.....
+1. Most districts have already set their budgets for next year. I think it won't be until the 21-22 school year, that the major cuts start happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Things like languages in lower grades, buses for sports, in addition to some sports themselves.
A lot depends on whether and how long kids will physically be in the schools.
Buses for sports? We do not have those in our MCPS MS or our HS. Parents (and 11th and 12th graders with driver's licenses and cars) have to drive the athletes.
Anonymous wrote:I think all our TA's are going to lose their jobs. And the coaches. And the librarians. And a bunch of people at central office. And some of the front office secretaries. I don't think any of the specials teachers will survive or if they do, it'll be 10% of normal staffing. I also think class sizes are going to increase and many young teachers are going to lose their jobs. I suspect that if not this fall, then next, school districts will lose 50% of their funding.
If people think things are bad now.....