Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other problem here is giving your money to Jesus freaks. There are plenty of secular alternatives in the froyo market.
That makes me want to go there even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other problem here is giving your money to Jesus freaks. There are plenty of secular alternatives in the froyo market.
This is the most stupid ridiculous comment I've read in months. Do you avoid Chicfila because they are run by 'jesus freaks' as well?
A lot of people avoid Chick-fil-a for this reason.
And I’m pretty sure Chic-fil-a ain’t hurting for their business. Go virtue signaler, go!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's low in calories, so yes it is.
Why wouldn't it be?
I think it's the way OP worded their question. Is it "healthy?" No, it's not healthy. But it's not terrible and as long as you follow PPs advice like working it into your daily calories and don't go crazy with toppings and have a moderate portion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other problem here is giving your money to Jesus freaks. There are plenty of secular alternatives in the froyo market.
This is the most stupid ridiculous comment I've read in months. Do you avoid Chicfila because they are run by 'jesus freaks' as well?
A lot of people avoid Chick-fil-a for this reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other problem here is giving your money to Jesus freaks. There are plenty of secular alternatives in the froyo market.
This is the most stupid ridiculous comment I've read in months. Do you avoid Chicfila because they are run by 'jesus freaks' as well?
Anonymous wrote:The other problem here is giving your money to Jesus freaks. There are plenty of secular alternatives in the froyo market.
Anonymous wrote:The other problem here is giving your money to Jesus freaks. There are plenty of secular alternatives in the froyo market.
Anonymous wrote:It's low in calories, so yes it is.
Why wouldn't it be?