Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.
Why wouldn’t MD want the tax revenue? Carve out the mall, ellipse, WH, Congressional complex and any contiguous federal property. That would be Washington, DC. The rest Washington, MD.
No matter how much you think Maryland ought to want DC, the reality is that Maryland doesn't. So you could equally well advocate for DC joining Narnia or Equestria.
Presumably MD residents and state officials have made statements against retrocession. Can you provide some links?
Anonymous wrote:The issue: DC residents pay federal income tax but have no voting representation in Congress.
Proposed solutions that have already been endlessly debated: DC statehood; giving all territories voting representatives; retrocession to Maryland; DC residents not paying federal taxes, etc.
My proposal: DC residents should continue paying federal income taxes (we don't want to turn the city into a tax haven), but the revenue should go into a special fund dedicated to improvements to the city. DC belongs to the entire nation, and it should be the best darn model of a city the nation can imagine. Roads, infrastructure, Metro, museums, law enforcement -- all should be repaired / improved to the highest standard. Smithsonian museums open until 9:00 or 10:00pm for locals to enjoy as much as tourists (especially since there are limited family friendly options in the city after the museums close). Money would also go to public health facilities, including re-establishing asylums for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others. Once the country sees how effective a solution this is, the homeless population would drop dramatically.
What do you think? What changes would you make to DC if our taxes went into a dedicated capital improvement fund?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would rather stop paying federal taxes than become a state.
If that happens, I'm buying as much property as possible. DC will have land prices on par with Monaco. Every rich person and company in the country will want to own property here.
Anonymous wrote:No, I want two senators and a member of the house.
Anonymous wrote:The issue: DC residents pay federal income tax but have no voting representation in Congress.
Proposed solutions that have already been endlessly debated: DC statehood; giving all territories voting representatives; retrocession to Maryland; DC residents not paying federal taxes, etc.
My proposal: DC residents should continue paying federal income taxes (we don't want to turn the city into a tax haven), but the revenue should go into a special fund dedicated to improvements to the city. DC belongs to the entire nation, and it should be the best darn model of a city the nation can imagine. Roads, infrastructure, Metro, museums, law enforcement -- all should be repaired / improved to the highest standard. Smithsonian museums open until 9:00 or 10:00pm for locals to enjoy as much as tourists (especially since there are limited family friendly options in the city after the museums close). Money would also go to public health facilities, including re-establishing asylums for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others. Once the country sees how effective a solution this is, the homeless population would drop dramatically.
What do you think? What changes would you make to DC if our taxes went into a dedicated capital improvement fund?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.
Why wouldn’t MD want the tax revenue? Carve out the mall, ellipse, WH, Congressional complex and any contiguous federal property. That would be Washington, DC. The rest Washington, MD.
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The issue: DC residents pay federal income tax but have no voting representation in Congress.
Proposed solutions that have already been endlessly debated: DC statehood; giving all territories voting representatives; retrocession to Maryland; DC residents not paying federal taxes, etc.
My proposal: DC residents should continue paying federal income taxes (we don't want to turn the city into a tax haven), but the revenue should go into a special fund dedicated to improvements to the city. DC belongs to the entire nation, and it should be the best darn model of a city the nation can imagine. Roads, infrastructure, Metro, museums, law enforcement -- all should be repaired / improved to the highest standard. Smithsonian museums open until 9:00 or 10:00pm for locals to enjoy as much as tourists (especially since there are limited family friendly options in the city after the museums close). Money would also go to public health facilities, including re-establishing asylums for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others. Once the country sees how effective a solution this is, the homeless population would drop dramatically.
What do you think? What changes would you make to DC if our taxes went into a dedicated capital improvement fund?
Why do we even have to pay federal taxes at all? Other territories without representation don’t.
DC is not a territory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.
Why wouldn’t MD want the tax revenue? Carve out the mall, ellipse, WH, Congressional complex and any contiguous federal property. That would be Washington, DC. The rest Washington, MD.
No matter how much you think Maryland ought to want DC, the reality is that Maryland doesn't. So you could equally well advocate for DC joining Narnia or Equestria.
Presumably MD residents and state officials have made statements against retrocession. Can you provide some links?
I agree that DC residents should have representation, but at the very least, MD should have the opportunity to get its land back if it is not being used for the original purpose. If MD votes against retrocession, then DC should be a state. If MD votes for retrocession and DC votes against it, then DC remains a federal district with no representation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.
Why wouldn’t MD want the tax revenue? Carve out the mall, ellipse, WH, Congressional complex and any contiguous federal property. That would be Washington, DC. The rest Washington, MD.
No matter how much you think Maryland ought to want DC, the reality is that Maryland doesn't. So you could equally well advocate for DC joining Narnia or Equestria.
Presumably MD residents and state officials have made statements against retrocession. Can you provide some links?
I agree that DC residents should have representation, but at the very least, MD should have the opportunity to get its land back if it is not being used for the original purpose. If MD votes against retrocession, then DC should be a state. If MD votes for retrocession and DC votes against it, then DC remains a federal district with no representation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.
Why wouldn’t MD want the tax revenue? Carve out the mall, ellipse, WH, Congressional complex and any contiguous federal property. That would be Washington, DC. The rest Washington, MD.
No matter how much you think Maryland ought to want DC, the reality is that Maryland doesn't. So you could equally well advocate for DC joining Narnia or Equestria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.
Why wouldn’t MD want the tax revenue? Carve out the mall, ellipse, WH, Congressional complex and any contiguous federal property. That would be Washington, DC. The rest Washington, MD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The issue: DC residents pay federal income tax but have no voting representation in Congress.
Proposed solutions that have already been endlessly debated: DC statehood; giving all territories voting representatives; retrocession to Maryland; DC residents not paying federal taxes, etc.
My proposal: DC residents should continue paying federal income taxes (we don't want to turn the city into a tax haven), but the revenue should go into a special fund dedicated to improvements to the city. DC belongs to the entire nation, and it should be the best darn model of a city the nation can imagine. Roads, infrastructure, Metro, museums, law enforcement -- all should be repaired / improved to the highest standard. Smithsonian museums open until 9:00 or 10:00pm for locals to enjoy as much as tourists (especially since there are limited family friendly options in the city after the museums close). Money would also go to public health facilities, including re-establishing asylums for the mentally ill who are a danger to themselves and others. Once the country sees how effective a solution this is, the homeless population would drop dramatically.
What do you think? What changes would you make to DC if our taxes went into a dedicated capital improvement fund?
Why do we even have to pay federal taxes at all? Other territories without representation don’t.
Anonymous wrote:Maryland doesn't want dc it has enough issues with Baltimore.