Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia’s acceptance is around 7%. Cornell 12%. St Albans’s college acceptance isn’ t that great. A good student might get into Kenyon or UChicago.
40 out of 80 or so went so went to Yale, Harvard, Chicago, Princeton, Columbia and Penn last year. 7 alone went to Yale. Sorry, so wrong.
This is a bold face lie! Don't believe the hype.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Columbia’s acceptance is around 7%. Cornell 12%. St Albans’s college acceptance isn’ t that great. A good student might get into Kenyon or UChicago.
40 out of 80 or so went so went to Yale, Harvard, Chicago, Princeton, Columbia and Penn last year. 7 alone went to Yale. Sorry, so wrong.
Anonymous wrote:
I don't have skin in this game, but it seemed more selective. I assume there are bottlenecks at certain grade levels.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Think about it this way:
Andover's acceptance rate is 13%. They pull from all over the country and the world, and are one of the most coveted private high schools.
Aside from some kindergarten classes, where there are simply very few slots, I can't imagine day schools in this area--even the best ones--having an acceptance rate that is that much lower than a top independent boarding school.
My guess is that you have a few schools that hover around 15-25%, and then the rest are significantly higher.
That's fine; acceptance rate is simply NOT a proxy for excellence. UChicago had a very high acceptance rate before they started accepting the Common App, simply because they had a self-selecting applicant pool. As soon as they started taking the Common App, their acceptance rate plummeted and people started talking about how great the school is. The school didn't change; the number of applications did.
OP here. I'm not interested in acceptance rates because of prestige, but for practical planning for my children. And while acceptance rates are fuzzy predictors at best, the difference between a 7% acceptance rate and a 30% rate are huge when it comes to figuring out where my dc can realistically go to school.
Anonymous wrote:Columbia’s acceptance is around 7%. Cornell 12%. St Albans’s college acceptance isn’ t that great. A good student might get into Kenyon or UChicago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does acceptance rate to a private school even matter? All that should matter is whether it's the right school for your kid--and if he's able to get in, great!
Because no one wants to waste time applying to a school with a negligible change of acceptance. If some schools are truly ultra selective, it makes no sense to waste time and energy and put your kid through the ringer only to be rejected and have to go public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beauvoir boys have an accept rate of 8O+% at 4th grade. That’s going to skew the numbers some.
If you have a NCS kid, will it be easier for her sibling to get into St. Albans? Does it treat as a sibling? Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Columbia’s acceptance is around 7%. Cornell 12%. St Albans’s college acceptance isn’ t that great. A good student might get into Kenyon or UChicago.
probablyAnonymous wrote:I’m the Georgia poster from another thread, and, as a math person, I agree, the lack of data can be frustrating. However, as others have pointed out, I think it’s a lot more complicated than a college admission rate (which itself is far from telling the whole story for any particular kid).
The school we ended up at also has a 25% admission rate listed in one of those publications. But, I know for a fact the school has a tremendous expansion in 6th grade and almost no expansion any other year except 7th. So, the 8th graders applying have a much lower chance. But then, I also know there is a local “feeder” K-8 that takes up almost 1/3 of the 6 grade entries and almost all the 7th grade expansion. So your odds applying from that school are closer to 50%, whereas your odds as a non expansion year kid from elsewhere are almost zero.
The number of kids we are talking about is also much smaller than most universities. So, by the time you find your kid’s “admission pool” (let’s say - female, 6th grade, non feeder kid, no athlete) you may only really be competing for 2 or 3 spots - so the odds have a huge fluctuation year to year.
Because no one wants to waste time applying to a school with a negligible change of acceptance. If some schools are truly ultra selective, it makes no sense to waste time and energy and put your kid through the ringer only to be rejected and have to go public.