Anonymous wrote:I'm fine with Hogan's approach. Gives me hope that there can be an in person end to the school year. This burning the candle on all ends can not continue much longer or I will lose my job.
Anonymous wrote:I would also appreciate them making the announcement of additional closures at least 1 week before the kids are scheduled to go back. I am certain that they cannot go back on April 27, but I do get nervous when they wait until the Wednesday before to announce it. I don't think they're going back in May. I think they'll be out for the rest of the year but my 5th grader really hopes they'll get to go back for a week or two in June. Wants to be in the building again and actually see teachers/friends before "graduating" to middle school.
Anonymous wrote:The governor of California is saying no groups more than 300 until 2021. I assume that would include schools.
Anonymous wrote:At this point even going back in August is iffy. We need a vaccine or we are just setting up at risk school staff for infection as well as student families. Too much liability in the schools unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Look at his announcement history on school closings. He has typically announced school closures about two days in advance. For the initial closing, it was announced late afternoon on Thursday that schools would be closed beginning the following Monday. The timeline was similar for the extension. I doubt he will address school closure extensions before next Wednesday (4/22).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before they actually implement broad-based antibody testing, virus testing, and contact tracing, they can't say when schools can open because they won't have a sense of how quickly the virus is still spreading and how many people actually have had it.
They need that data to make a determination about schools.
I think it's safe to say that all of that won't be reliably in place for at least another month.
Actually, according to Hogan, Maryland apparently has hundreds of people already doing contract tracing and is in good shape scaling up the test for active virus — needs to hire more contract tracers, but a system already in place . Really the only big ask is antibody testing. Hard to tell fromsummary status of that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before they actually implement broad-based antibody testing, virus testing, and contact tracing, they can't say when schools can open because they won't have a sense of how quickly the virus is still spreading and how many people actually have had it.
They need that data to make a determination about schools.
I think it's safe to say that all of that won't be reliably in place for at least another month.
Anonymous wrote:Before they actually implement broad-based antibody testing, virus testing, and contact tracing, they can't say when schools can open because they won't have a sense of how quickly the virus is still spreading and how many people actually have had it.
They need that data to make a determination about schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's no way they're going back this month. I like his response to the crisis so far but I think he should talk about the school decision soon — no reason to delay the inevitable. Although I'm not sure my kids are going back until there's a vaccine!
That will probably be 2022
Anonymous wrote:There's no way they're going back this month. I like his response to the crisis so far but I think he should talk about the school decision soon — no reason to delay the inevitable. Although I'm not sure my kids are going back until there's a vaccine!