Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Drivers have a responsibility to obey the speed limit...
AND...
pedestrians who choose to walk in the street have a responsibility to watch for oncoming traffic...
No, we don't.
Way to both sides everything, especially in the middle of a pandemic.
This is a typo, correct. They are not actually arguing that the pedestrian does not need to watch for traffic while in the road????
I am the FIRST person to believe that pedestrians should use the roads as social distancing maneuver area. But the idea that I would not look both ways before jumping in the street or look at the traffic patters just seems insane. Protect yourself by being smart. Don't rely on a driver to see you stepping out between two parked cars. Darwin people.
I walk with my little one all the time and I constantly say, 'Look both ways and then cross'. I am not saying. 'It is COVID season, the rules do not apply, traffic has a moral obligation to stop for you.'
I look both ways, because I want to reduce the chances of a driver running me over.
Nonetheless, drivers actually do have a moral obligation to stop for people, regardless of what the people may or may not have done. Both when there's a pandemic, and when there isn't a pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Drivers have a responsibility to obey the speed limit...
AND...
pedestrians who choose to walk in the street have a responsibility to watch for oncoming traffic...
No, we don't.
Way to both sides everything, especially in the middle of a pandemic.
This is a typo, correct. They are not actually arguing that the pedestrian does not need to watch for traffic while in the road????
I am the FIRST person to believe that pedestrians should use the roads as social distancing maneuver area. But the idea that I would not look both ways before jumping in the street or look at the traffic patters just seems insane. Protect yourself by being smart. Don't rely on a driver to see you stepping out between two parked cars. Darwin people.
I walk with my little one all the time and I constantly say, 'Look both ways and then cross'. I am not saying. 'It is COVID season, the rules do not apply, traffic has a moral obligation to stop for you.'
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MYOB
It's definitely a lot more my business than yours particularly since almost all of the obnoxious & dangerous drivers on the streets in my NW neighborhood come from MD.
Unfortunately most of our incompetent police are also from MD and don't want to be bothered with enforcing the cities driving laws, coronavirus or otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Drivers have a responsibility to obey the speed limit...
AND...
pedestrians who choose to walk in the street have a responsibility to watch for oncoming traffic...
No, we don't.
Way to both sides everything, especially in the middle of a pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Please answer the previous question.
Anonymous wrote:Drivers are both legally and morally responsible for a whole lot more than just obeying the speed limit.
Also, obeying the speed limit means driving no faster than the posted speed limit, and likely slower, depending on conditions. Obeying the speed limit does NOT mean driving less than 12 miles per hour faster than the posted speed limit.
You're not actually saying that pedestrians bear no personal responsibility for their own safety when walking in the street???????Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Drivers have a responsibility to obey the speed limit...
AND...
pedestrians who choose to walk in the street have a responsibility to watch for oncoming traffic...
No, we don't.
Way to both sides everything, especially in the middle of a pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Drivers have a responsibility to obey the speed limit...
AND...
pedestrians who choose to walk in the street have a responsibility to watch for oncoming traffic...
Anonymous wrote:MYOB
Anonymous wrote:MYOB
Anonymous wrote:Man, don’t give Q7 owners a bad name. Cmon now.