Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people want a textbook when the internet exists. Textbooks waste paper. Just go on Khan Academy or IXL if you want to see what a student needs to learn in a particular grade.
Last I checked, Khan Academy -- or IXL, for that matter - doesn't teach social studies. Or science. Or English, in any meaningful way.
Any recommendations on how to teach history 'from the internet'??
Watch documentaries, have your child come up with a research topic and let them read books about that topic, talk about current events and how it relates to government and similar historical events, etc. You don’t need a white-washed textbook to teach history.
Actually, one place where I think current history teaching is failing kids is that it is very "episodic." Today, kids, we're going to look at primary documents about the Scopes Monkey Trial. Tomorrow, we'll do an activity on the stock market crash. Well-written textbooks provide an overview of events, and allow kids to put them on a timeline to make sense of them. Should they go deeper? Absolutely. But for teachers to be arguing that they aren't necessary is troubling. Look at any survey of American citizens (or even college students) on history or government and you will see that current methods are failing, no matter how many graphic organizers the kids fill out or primary documents they "analyze" during their formative years. (That's another thing that gets me; it is necessary to know historical facts before you can "analyze".)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people want a textbook when the internet exists. Textbooks waste paper. Just go on Khan Academy or IXL if you want to see what a student needs to learn in a particular grade.
Last I checked, Khan Academy -- or IXL, for that matter - doesn't teach social studies. Or science. Or English, in any meaningful way.
Any recommendations on how to teach history 'from the internet'??
Watch documentaries, have your child come up with a research topic and let them read books about that topic, talk about current events and how it relates to government and similar historical events, etc. You don’t need a white-washed textbook to teach history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people want a textbook when the internet exists. Textbooks waste paper. Just go on Khan Academy or IXL if you want to see what a student needs to learn in a particular grade.
Last I checked, Khan Academy -- or IXL, for that matter - doesn't teach social studies. Or science. Or English, in any meaningful way.
Any recommendations on how to teach history 'from the internet'??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people think books = anti-teachers? It's just a method of delivery. No one is saying they don't want teachers, just that they want the content delivered in a way so that parents and kids can access it.
Why do parents need to access the content? I've already been to school. It's my DC's turn now. I don't want to access his textbook or his content. I don't want to teach him. The teacher does that.
I need access because the kid has no idea what he has learned, what he is learning and what is coming to him. The book and curriculum would tell me that DC is learning percentages in January, 2020. Right now DC is drowning into lose leaf papers and has no idea where his percentage papers are in case he needs to refresh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people think books = anti-teachers? It's just a method of delivery. No one is saying they don't want teachers, just that they want the content delivered in a way so that parents and kids can access it.
Why do parents need to access the content? I've already been to school. It's my DC's turn now. I don't want to access his textbook or his content. I don't want to teach him. The teacher does that.
Anonymous wrote:I'm an upper elementary teacher in FCPS and I would LOVE to use textbooks. But using textbooks is considered to promote uninspired teaching and indicates a lack of creativity. So instead I have to recreate the wheel and create packets covering every single concept. Talk about a waste of paper. At least with a textbook, it could be reused.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people want a textbook when the internet exists. Textbooks waste paper. Just go on Khan Academy or IXL if you want to see what a student needs to learn in a particular grade.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people want a textbook when the internet exists. Textbooks waste paper. Just go on Khan Academy or IXL if you want to see what a student needs to learn in a particular grade.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why people want a textbook when the internet exists. Textbooks waste paper. Just go on Khan Academy or IXL if you want to see what a student needs to learn in a particular grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people think books = anti-teachers? It's just a method of delivery. No one is saying they don't want teachers, just that they want the content delivered in a way so that parents and kids can access it.
Why do parents need to access the content? I've already been to school. It's my DC's turn now. I don't want to access his textbook or his content. I don't want to teach him. The teacher does that.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people think books = anti-teachers? It's just a method of delivery. No one is saying they don't want teachers, just that they want the content delivered in a way so that parents and kids can access it.