Anonymous wrote:
Because money DOES buy a certain measure of physical, emotional, educational and social comfort and divorces are extremely expensive.
This is for your usual run-of-the-mill, basically decent couple who don't appreciate each other.
My response changes for abusive relationships.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's it to you? If you're not in that position, no one owes you an explanation.
Her AP is "staying for the kids".
+1 And she's big, BIG mad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Couples should really only stay for the kids until middle school at that point the children are very smart and articulate and can tell a judge who they want to live with and which parent is really the preferred parent .
Horrible, evil advice. My parents did this to me and having to choose one parent over another was a terrible trauma I still have not gotten over 25 years later. And I seemed “fine” at the time. No child of any age should ever be put in such an awful position.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's it to you? If you're not in that position, no one owes you an explanation.
Her AP is "staying for the kids".
Hahaha!
Truth.
Anonymous wrote: Couples should really only stay for the kids until middle school at that point the children are very smart and articulate and can tell a judge who they want to live with and which parent is really the preferred parent .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's it to you? If you're not in that position, no one owes you an explanation.
Her AP is "staying for the kids".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's it to you? If you're not in that position, no one owes you an explanation.
Her AP is "staying for the kids".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fear? Money? Not wanting to downsize?
I don’t understand this mentality- can you explain? Everyone I know whose parents “stayed for the kids,” later resented then for lying or have trouble in their own relationships now. Not looking for any passive aggressive answers, I’m just genuinely curious as to how this models what a loving marriage should be to children. Life just seems too short to only roll with the punches day-by-day. I know I wouldn’t want back and look at my life and seeing how I waited such and such years as a countdown to when the kids graduated Hs.
Most people whose parents got divorced also blame their parents. Most people blame their parents, period. Look, some people get lucky in love and have nice, happy relationships, and their kids appreciate that. Other people don't, and it's a less than ideal situation whether they stay or leave, and the kids always think they should have done something differently. I personally can't get over the number of ADULTS who are so upset and resentful when their parents get divorced, like it's still their business.
Anonymous wrote:Fear? Money? Not wanting to downsize?
I don’t understand this mentality- can you explain? Everyone I know whose parents “stayed for the kids,” later resented then for lying or have trouble in their own relationships now. Not looking for any passive aggressive answers, I’m just genuinely curious as to how this models what a loving marriage should be to children. Life just seems too short to only roll with the punches day-by-day. I know I wouldn’t want back and look at my life and seeing how I waited such and such years as a countdown to when the kids graduated Hs.
Anonymous wrote: Couples should really only stay for the kids until middle school at that point the children are very smart and articulate and can tell a judge who they want to live with and which parent is really the preferred parent .
Anonymous wrote: Couples should really only stay for the kids until middle school at that point the children are very smart and articulate and can tell a judge who they want to live with and which parent is really the preferred parent .