Anonymous wrote:So I have carefully saved my leave and my coworker constantly uses it for all kinds of things. She now gets free leave for claiming Corona and I spend my leave. Advancing leave is fine but just giving it out seems a bit out of control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for fed workers -- is there a sick leave bank you guys can use if you are out of paid sick leave (like the woman who just came back from maternity leave, or the new hires)? Maybe they should also remove restrictions on the use of the sick leave borrowing bank.
There is, but you have to burn through all of your sick and annual leave first. A lot of people, if healthy enough to work, will continue to come in sick rather than be forced to burn up all their leave. And who is going to donate leave if they’re in fear of a virus getting them sick?
This is going to create an interesting dynamic between younger workers (who tend to have less leave than more senior employees) who may have mild symptoms and not want to burn their little leave balance vs. older employees who have more leave, but lower immunity. We should be in this all together like other countries that are guaranteeing pay in case of quarantine or illness. But instead it’s every man for himself in the fed gov.
Coming in because you refuse to burn your leave is selfish when you have a leave bank you can draw on.
My manager requires a doctor note for each day, so not everyone can just take sick leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I have carefully saved my leave and my coworker constantly uses it for all kinds of things. She now gets free leave for claiming Corona and I spend my leave. Advancing leave is fine but just giving it out seems a bit out of control.
+1. The idea that people should just get extra leave seems misplaced, especially for people who can telework.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:*to specify I don’t think this should come out of current leave banks. I for one already have negative sick leave from recent maternity leave. I guess I’d just have to come in and infect everyone if we’re gonna put the burden of this virus on the individual!
What if you just catch the flu...should you bare the burden for that? If the taxpayers are giving you extra leave for Covid, why not the flu, or your child's flu or you child's cold?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have to use sick leave if you are sick? You are kidding!
It’s this mentality that is going to make people come into work sick and spread this thing. Not everyone can just take 2-3 weeks off. I would much rather someone be given paid leave then have them schlep into the office getting everyone else sick because they can’t go without a paycheck.
Anonymous wrote:*to specify I don’t think this should come out of current leave banks. I for one already have negative sick leave from recent maternity leave. I guess I’d just have to come in and infect everyone if we’re gonna put the burden of this virus on the individual!
Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised there was nothing more on travel. I have an upcoming trip I am preparing like a mad woman for. If it is going to get cancelled, I’d love to know sooner rather than later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for fed workers -- is there a sick leave bank you guys can use if you are out of paid sick leave (like the woman who just came back from maternity leave, or the new hires)? Maybe they should also remove restrictions on the use of the sick leave borrowing bank.
There is, but you have to burn through all of your sick and annual leave first. A lot of people, if healthy enough to work, will continue to come in sick rather than be forced to burn up all their leave. And who is going to donate leave if they’re in fear of a virus getting them sick?
This is going to create an interesting dynamic between younger workers (who tend to have less leave than more senior employees) who may have mild symptoms and not want to burn their little leave balance vs. older employees who have more leave, but lower immunity. We should be in this all together like other countries that are guaranteeing pay in case of quarantine or illness. But instead it’s every man for himself in the fed gov.
Coming in because you refuse to burn your leave is selfish when you have a leave bank you can draw on.
Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised there was nothing more on travel. I have an upcoming trip I am preparing like a mad woman for. If it is going to get cancelled, I’d love to know sooner rather than later.
Anonymous wrote:So I have carefully saved my leave and my coworker constantly uses it for all kinds of things. She now gets free leave for claiming Corona and I spend my leave. Advancing leave is fine but just giving it out seems a bit out of control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for fed workers -- is there a sick leave bank you guys can use if you are out of paid sick leave (like the woman who just came back from maternity leave, or the new hires)? Maybe they should also remove restrictions on the use of the sick leave borrowing bank.
There is, but you have to burn through all of your sick and annual leave first. A lot of people, if healthy enough to work, will continue to come in sick rather than be forced to burn up all their leave. And who is going to donate leave if they’re in fear of a virus getting them sick?
This is going to create an interesting dynamic between younger workers (who tend to have less leave than more senior employees) who may have mild symptoms and not want to burn their little leave balance vs. older employees who have more leave, but lower immunity. We should be in this all together like other countries that are guaranteeing pay in case of quarantine or illness. But instead it’s every man for himself in the fed gov.
Coming in because you refuse to burn your leave is selfish when you have a leave bank you can draw on.