Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would you regret more, never being a parent or never remarrying? If you want to be a parent, have a baby now on your own. It will be easier for you to find a divorced dad to marry later on than someone excited about your giving birth to your ex’s baby.
This. If you have a baby (or babies) on your own you'll be just like any other divorced woman with kids from her ex-spouse.
Except that other divorced women who had children with their ex-spouse had those children during the marriage, and their ex-spouses are co-parenting. Has OP’s ex signed away his parental rights? Is there a legal avenue for him to change his mind in the future? Can OP really predict how this will turn out?
She said in her original post that her soon to be ex-husband had signed off on the embryos completely, but the bolded is something I would want to be 100% sure on before I used those embryos, whether I was single or married.
OP, if you have embryos already frozen, does that mean you have fertility issues? I mean, I'm just confused in this scenario.If you have known fertility issues and want to have a child, I think you should go for it on your own.
I’m not sure it is legally possible to sign away your parental rights to children who do not yet exist. I have a feeling OP’s ex has only given permission to OP to make decisions over the future use of the embryos, as far as the fertility clinic is concerned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would you regret more, never being a parent or never remarrying? If you want to be a parent, have a baby now on your own. It will be easier for you to find a divorced dad to marry later on than someone excited about your giving birth to your ex’s baby.
This. If you have a baby (or babies) on your own you'll be just like any other divorced woman with kids from her ex-spouse.
Except that other divorced women who had children with their ex-spouse had those children during the marriage, and their ex-spouses are co-parenting. Has OP’s ex signed away his parental rights? Is there a legal avenue for him to change his mind in the future? Can OP really predict how this will turn out?
She said in her original post that her soon to be ex-husband had signed off on the embryos completely, but the bolded is something I would want to be 100% sure on before I used those embryos, whether I was single or married.
OP, if you have embryos already frozen, does that mean you have fertility issues? I mean, I'm just confused in this scenario.If you have known fertility issues and want to have a child, I think you should go for it on your own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would you regret more, never being a parent or never remarrying? If you want to be a parent, have a baby now on your own. It will be easier for you to find a divorced dad to marry later on than someone excited about your giving birth to your ex’s baby.
This. If you have a baby (or babies) on your own you'll be just like any other divorced woman with kids from her ex-spouse.
Except that other divorced women who had children with their ex-spouse had those children during the marriage, and their ex-spouses are co-parenting. Has OP’s ex signed away his parental rights? Is there a legal avenue for him to change his mind in the future? Can OP really predict how this will turn out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would you regret more, never being a parent or never remarrying? If you want to be a parent, have a baby now on your own. It will be easier for you to find a divorced dad to marry later on than someone excited about your giving birth to your ex’s baby.
This. If you have a baby (or babies) on your own you'll be just like any other divorced woman with kids from her ex-spouse.
Anonymous wrote:What would you regret more, never being a parent or never remarrying? If you want to be a parent, have a baby now on your own. It will be easier for you to find a divorced dad to marry later on than someone excited about your giving birth to your ex’s baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another man here. No. Assuming what you mean is you meet and fall in love with a man who is able to have children with his sperm and you say “honey I’d like to impregnate myself with my ex husbands sperm and have you and I raise the baby as our own.” I think that’s what you’re saying. I don’t think many men would be up for that.
Yeah, I am seeing that. Totally fair, I get it. It does seem like a double standard though because many women use donor eggs. But I suppose this comes down to innate differences between men and women. I would use a donor egg for one kid and hope he would be willing to use donor sperm (my embryo) for another, but I get that this is likely not going to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another man here. No. Assuming what you mean is you meet and fall in love with a man who is able to have children with his sperm and you say “honey I’d like to impregnate myself with my ex husbands sperm and have you and I raise the baby as our own.” I think that’s what you’re saying. I don’t think many men would be up for that.
Yeah, I am seeing that. Totally fair, I get it. It does seem like a double standard though because many women use donor eggs. But I suppose this comes down to innate differences between men and women. I would use a donor egg for one kid and hope he would be willing to use donor sperm (my embryo) for another, but I get that this is likely not going to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Another man here. No. Assuming what you mean is you meet and fall in love with a man who is able to have children with his sperm and you say “honey I’d like to impregnate myself with my ex husbands sperm and have you and I raise the baby as our own.” I think that’s what you’re saying. I don’t think many men would be up for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes but I'm adopted and the whole genetic ties aspect has never been a big deal to me. My baby is my baby regardless of whose DNA it's compromised of.
Compromised is a fitting term here