Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous
PLLEEEAAASSSSEEEE. Come on now coach. Soccer isn’t rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:Do you remember which teams ranked 1,2,3 for age groups U10-U15 five or six year ago?
Who CARESS! Only obsessed parents that dream the name of the team will give them fast entry to college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coach here; this is a tough one, but here is my take.
Individuals and teams can certainly develop yet not see an improved record. The opposite is also true.
The game results are more determined by who you play against, while some of that is under the control of the club not all leagues are created equal. I've seen bad teams placed in lower leagues beat up on teams, and good teams placed too high lose most their games to even better teams.
Another thing to think about is - there are a lot of decent coaches out there, despite what it may seem reading these forums sometimes. If your team starts out at the bottom, say due to it's talent pool, and still winds up at or near the bottom at the end of the year. That doesn't mean they didn't develop - the other teams are ALSO developing and that is an aspect people tend to forget about.
So will teams that develop win out over teams who don't? - all things being equal, yes, however there are lots of factors, such as how big was the gap in the first place? How much of a timeline are we talking about?
The tough aspect for a lot of parents is they don't even know what development looks like because they don't understand the sport. So if all you have to go by is win/losses well....
To the OP to re-utilize your school analogy, it's like trying to determine how good your child's calculus teacher is when you barely know how to add and subtract. If you don't know enough about the subject, you'll need neutral and knowledgeable third party analysis/opinion to help.
Good post. Also, it's important to separate between team progress and player progress. A team may not be winning, but if your DC is developing well, seeing time on the field, and the coach is giving her good feedback, that is worth more than being ignored on the bench under a blanket during a showcase on the "winning" team.
True, but most kids need to win more than lose; otherwise, their motivation won't last very long. Winning is important. Not the most important by far...but it can't be overlooked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coach here; this is a tough one, but here is my take.
Individuals and teams can certainly develop yet not see an improved record. The opposite is also true.
The game results are more determined by who you play against, while some of that is under the control of the club not all leagues are created equal. I've seen bad teams placed in lower leagues beat up on teams, and good teams placed too high lose most their games to even better teams.
Another thing to think about is - there are a lot of decent coaches out there, despite what it may seem reading these forums sometimes. If your team starts out at the bottom, say due to it's talent pool, and still winds up at or near the bottom at the end of the year. That doesn't mean they didn't develop - the other teams are ALSO developing and that is an aspect people tend to forget about.
So will teams that develop win out over teams who don't? - all things being equal, yes, however there are lots of factors, such as how big was the gap in the first place? How much of a timeline are we talking about?
The tough aspect for a lot of parents is they don't even know what development looks like because they don't understand the sport. So if all you have to go by is win/losses well....
To the OP to re-utilize your school analogy, it's like trying to determine how good your child's calculus teacher is when you barely know how to add and subtract. If you don't know enough about the subject, you'll need neutral and knowledgeable third party analysis/opinion to help.
Good post. Also, it's important to separate between team progress and player progress. A team may not be winning, but if your DC is developing well, seeing time on the field, and the coach is giving her good feedback, that is worth more than being ignored on the bench under a blanket during a showcase on the "winning" team.
True, but most kids need to win more than lose; otherwise, their motivation won't last very long. Winning is important. Not the most important by far...but it can't be overlooked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coach here; this is a tough one, but here is my take.
Individuals and teams can certainly develop yet not see an improved record. The opposite is also true.
The game results are more determined by who you play against, while some of that is under the control of the club not all leagues are created equal. I've seen bad teams placed in lower leagues beat up on teams, and good teams placed too high lose most their games to even better teams.
Another thing to think about is - there are a lot of decent coaches out there, despite what it may seem reading these forums sometimes. If your team starts out at the bottom, say due to it's talent pool, and still winds up at or near the bottom at the end of the year. That doesn't mean they didn't develop - the other teams are ALSO developing and that is an aspect people tend to forget about.
So will teams that develop win out over teams who don't? - all things being equal, yes, however there are lots of factors, such as how big was the gap in the first place? How much of a timeline are we talking about?
The tough aspect for a lot of parents is they don't even know what development looks like because they don't understand the sport. So if all you have to go by is win/losses well....
To the OP to re-utilize your school analogy, it's like trying to determine how good your child's calculus teacher is when you barely know how to add and subtract. If you don't know enough about the subject, you'll need neutral and knowledgeable third party analysis/opinion to help.
Good post. Also, it's important to separate between team progress and player progress. A team may not be winning, but if your DC is developing well, seeing time on the field, and the coach is giving her good feedback, that is worth more than being ignored on the bench under a blanket during a showcase on the "winning" team.
Anonymous wrote:Coach here; this is a tough one, but here is my take.
Individuals and teams can certainly develop yet not see an improved record. The opposite is also true.
The game results are more determined by who you play against, while some of that is under the control of the club not all leagues are created equal. I've seen bad teams placed in lower leagues beat up on teams, and good teams placed too high lose most their games to even better teams.
Another thing to think about is - there are a lot of decent coaches out there, despite what it may seem reading these forums sometimes. If your team starts out at the bottom, say due to it's talent pool, and still winds up at or near the bottom at the end of the year. That doesn't mean they didn't develop - the other teams are ALSO developing and that is an aspect people tend to forget about.
So will teams that develop win out over teams who don't? - all things being equal, yes, however there are lots of factors, such as how big was the gap in the first place? How much of a timeline are we talking about?
The tough aspect for a lot of parents is they don't even know what development looks like because they don't understand the sport. So if all you have to go by is win/losses well....
To the OP to re-utilize your school analogy, it's like trying to determine how good your child's calculus teacher is when you barely know how to add and subtract. If you don't know enough about the subject, you'll need neutral and knowledgeable third party analysis/opinion to help.
Anonymous wrote:Coach here; this is a tough one, but here is my take.
Individuals and teams can certainly develop yet not see an improved record. The opposite is also true.
The game results are more determined by who you play against, while some of that is under the control of the club not all leagues are created equal. I've seen bad teams placed in lower leagues beat up on teams, and good teams placed too high lose most their games to even better teams.
Another thing to think about is - there are a lot of decent coaches out there, despite what it may seem reading these forums sometimes. If your team starts out at the bottom, say due to it's talent pool, and still winds up at or near the bottom at the end of the year. That doesn't mean they didn't develop - the other teams are ALSO developing and that is an aspect people tend to forget about.
So will teams that develop win out over teams who don't? - all things being equal, yes, however there are lots of factors, such as how big was the gap in the first place? How much of a timeline are we talking about?
The tough aspect for a lot of parents is they don't even know what development looks like because they don't understand the sport. So if all you have to go by is win/losses well....
To the OP to re-utilize your school analogy, it's like trying to determine how good your child's calculus teacher is when you barely know how to add and subtract. If you don't know enough about the subject, you'll need neutral and knowledgeable third party analysis/opinion to help.
Anonymous wrote:Coach here; this is a tough one, but here is my take.
Individuals and teams can certainly develop yet not see an improved record. The opposite is also true.
The game results are more determined by who you play against, while some of that is under the control of the club not all leagues are created equal. I've seen bad teams placed in lower leagues beat up on teams, and good teams placed too high lose most their games to even better teams.
Another thing to think about is - there are a lot of decent coaches out there, despite what it may seem reading these forums sometimes. If your team starts out at the bottom, say due to it's talent pool, and still winds up at or near the bottom at the end of the year. That doesn't mean they didn't develop - the other teams are ALSO developing and that is an aspect people tend to forget about.
So will teams that develop win out over teams who don't? - all things being equal, yes, however there are lots of factors, such as how big was the gap in the first place? How much of a timeline are we talking about?
The tough aspect for a lot of parents is they don't even know what development looks like because they don't understand the sport. So if all you have to go by is win/losses well....
To the OP to re-utilize your school analogy, it's like trying to determine how good your child's calculus teacher is when you barely know how to add and subtract. If you don't know enough about the subject, you'll need neutral and knowledgeable third party analysis/opinion to help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It really doesn’t have to be one versus the other, but business drives the coach and club (and most parents) towards winning, even at the early ages. However, if the coach is teaching properly from a developmental perspective the team will, more often than not, win. Maybe not right away, but eventually they will.
This is exactly what I was thinking as well when I started this thread. There are some coaches that claim “development” because their team(s) always have loosing records year after year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are also coaches that focus on recruiting and social media and claim "development" with each win when it's the new players developed elsewhere that are the top scorers and best players on the team.
+1000
FCV?