Eh, yeah, definitely. Normal people running for Prez have the Persist super-PAC behind them. Normal people while professors at H consult with LTV, Dow, Traveler et al. against the little guy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't a normal person run for President and win? Not a hypocrite who has their hands out. Truman, Eisenhower, and Ford weren't like this. The US is done. One big greedfest.

Elizabeth Warren is a normal person running for President, though it remains to be seen how she’ll fare.

Someone who lied about her heritage in order to become a Harvard prof and make millions advising big banks is not "normal" in my book.

Anonymous wrote:Can't a normal person run for President and win? Not a hypocrite who has their hands out. Truman, Eisenhower, and Ford weren't like this. The US is done. One big greedfest.

Elizabeth Warren is a normal person running for President, though it remains to be seen how she’ll fare.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it will be used. Something along the lines of.... Bernie will run the country much like his wife ran Burlington College. And, they will be proven correct should he win the election.

Yup.

We have zero evidence to believe that Bernie is more competent than his wife -- and I presume he helped her with this college thing? Imagine their kitchen table conversations...

Dude’s won three primaries in a row and out fundraised others in spite of breaking with all models. Obviously, the dude’s got no chops!

Boosted by Russia and Republicans alike (and the NRA early on). Guy hasn’t done it on his own.

Not surprised. One of many corrupt Democrats.

No one cares. Next.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it will be used. Something along the lines of.... Bernie will run the country much like his wife ran Burlington College. And, they will be proven correct should he win the election.

Yup.

We have zero evidence to believe that Bernie is more competent than his wife -- and I presume he helped her with this college thing? Imagine their kitchen table conversations...

Dude’s won three primaries in a row and out fundraised others in spite of breaking with all models. Obviously, the dude’s got no chops!

He does have campaigning and bankrupting a college chops.

He does not have governing a country chops.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it will be used. Something along the lines of.... Bernie will run the country much like his wife ran Burlington College. And, they will be proven correct should he win the election.

Yup.

We have zero evidence to believe that Bernie is more competent than his wife -- and I presume he helped her with this college thing? Imagine their kitchen table conversations...

Dude’s won three primaries in a row and out fundraised others in spite of breaking with all models. Obviously, the dude’s got no chops!

Jane is the brain.

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it will be used. Something along the lines of.... Bernie will run the country much like his wife ran Burlington College. And, they will be proven correct should he win the election.

Yup.

We have zero evidence to believe that Bernie is more competent than his wife -- and I presume he helped her with this college thing? Imagine their kitchen table conversations...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it will be used. Something along the lines of.... Bernie will run the country much like his wife ran Burlington College. And, they will be proven correct should he win the election.

I’m disappointed this fuzzy-headed logic about spouses wasn’t used against the Clintons.

In all seriousness, these posts are very enjoyable comedy.

Once again, serious discussion of the problems of establishment Democrats gets deflected by the whole ‘but Trump is even worse’ routine. This crap, aka not caring about outcomes that impact all but rather justifying awful behavior by pointing to slightly worse behavior, makes it obvious the Democratic establishment is not to be trusted.

I read the article and don’t see what she did wrong.

Anonymous wrote:Can't a normal person run for President and win? Not a hypocrite who has their hands out. Truman, Eisenhower, and Ford weren't like this. The US is done. One big greedfest.

Hear hear. Another thing that occurs to me is that they are almost all narcissists. I think it's the arrival of television that attracted these people. The ones too ugly to make it in Hollywood.

Anonymous wrote:Can't a normal person run for President and win? Not a hypocrite who has their hands out. Truman, Eisenhower, and Ford weren't like this. The US is done. One big greedfest.

Obamas-

Plus say what you want about Carter, he was definitely not greedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently she is in charge of Bernie's ad buys. Ad buyers for campaigns take 15% of ad money as their fee.

The grift is real.

You keep typing this and I would like to see a source.

What is your deal? Why post this over and over?

I'm OP, not PP - but I googled and found this Daily Kos piece from 2016

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/5/31/1532953/-The-Potential-Scandal-at-the-Heart-of-the-Sanders-Campaign

It seems like there's whispers about Jane Sanders drawing $ this way but my quick google search didn't reveal anything definitive

Better article with more details here by local Vermont reporters: https://vtdigger.org/2016/07/15/sanders-campaign-millions-go-to-mystery-firm/

Basically, two of Jane Sanders best friends own the house where the company is located. No one knows who is the beneficial owner of the company.