Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight-I'm driving the speed limit, looking forward mostly but also around and someone walks out suddenly into the street at night wearing all black and I hit them it's my fault?????? That 's some strange ass logic there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Realistically, everyone’s primary instinct is to protect themselves. The biggest danger to drivers is other cars, so they will always be focused primarily on other cars. It is suicidal for pedestrians (and cyclists) to think that this basic human instinct can be changed. Drivers need to actively stay aware of this but in high stress situations it’s always going to be unpredictable. If things go wrong who is going to end up in the hospital (or worse)?
I don't know ANYBODY who walks or bikes, who believes that a driver hitting them isn't a danger. Do you?
I don't ever want to hear, ever again, that people walking or people biking must take more care than people driving. People who believe that shouldn't be allowed to drive, because they're a public menace.
Well good luck with that![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Realistically, everyone’s primary instinct is to protect themselves. The biggest danger to drivers is other cars, so they will always be focused primarily on other cars. It is suicidal for pedestrians (and cyclists) to think that this basic human instinct can be changed. Drivers need to actively stay aware of this but in high stress situations it’s always going to be unpredictable. If things go wrong who is going to end up in the hospital (or worse)?
Thank you for making the case for adopting policies to reduce driving. DC should adopt a congestion charge, we should eliminate parking minimums on new development (and implement parking maximums!) and adopt road diets.
If that doesn't work - BAN CARS!
My pleasure! And in the meantime I will preemptively nominate you guys for a Darwin Award.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Realistically, everyone’s primary instinct is to protect themselves. The biggest danger to drivers is other cars, so they will always be focused primarily on other cars. It is suicidal for pedestrians (and cyclists) to think that this basic human instinct can be changed. Drivers need to actively stay aware of this but in high stress situations it’s always going to be unpredictable. If things go wrong who is going to end up in the hospital (or worse)?
Thank you for making the case for adopting policies to reduce driving. DC should adopt a congestion charge, we should eliminate parking minimums on new development (and implement parking maximums!) and adopt road diets.
If that doesn't work - BAN CARS!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Realistically, everyone’s primary instinct is to protect themselves. The biggest danger to drivers is other cars, so they will always be focused primarily on other cars. It is suicidal for pedestrians (and cyclists) to think that this basic human instinct can be changed. Drivers need to actively stay aware of this but in high stress situations it’s always going to be unpredictable. If things go wrong who is going to end up in the hospital (or worse)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Realistically, everyone’s primary instinct is to protect themselves. The biggest danger to drivers is other cars, so they will always be focused primarily on other cars. It is suicidal for pedestrians (and cyclists) to think that this basic human instinct can be changed. Drivers need to actively stay aware of this but in high stress situations it’s always going to be unpredictable. If things go wrong who is going to end up in the hospital (or worse)?
I don't know ANYBODY who walks or bikes, who believes that a driver hitting them isn't a danger. Do you?
I don't ever want to hear, ever again, that people walking or people biking must take more care than people driving. People who believe that shouldn't be allowed to drive, because they're a public menace.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Realistically, everyone’s primary instinct is to protect themselves. The biggest danger to drivers is other cars, so they will always be focused primarily on other cars. It is suicidal for pedestrians (and cyclists) to think that this basic human instinct can be changed. Drivers need to actively stay aware of this but in high stress situations it’s always going to be unpredictable. If things go wrong who is going to end up in the hospital (or worse)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Nope. Pedestrians are dangers only to themselves. Drivers are dangers to themselves and others. Therefore, drivers should be more careful because they can harm others as well as themselves.
Also, driving is a privilege; walking is a right.
Anonymous wrote:Calm down everyone. I'm pretty sure the Range Rover comment was a joke.
Between cars and pedestrians, a car will always win. Therefore, pedestrians should be more careful since they have a lot more to lose. Not giving drivers an excuse to do what they want but would you rather be flattened (and right) or alive (and still able to comment on DCUM)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Were they driving an expensive car? https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/world/expensive-car-drivers-study-scli-scn-intl/index.html
This has something to do with it.
As well as pedestrians all wearing black or gray.Put some color on people, or some reflective tape. It might help the fast driving jerks see you.
People wear black. If you can't see people wearing black, you're driving too fast. Slow down.
Not to mention the times that I've been out in hi vis, with lights, and people behind the wheel of motor vehicles still apparently couldn't see me...
In the dark? Seriously?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Were they driving an expensive car? https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/world/expensive-car-drivers-study-scli-scn-intl/index.html
This has something to do with it.
As well as pedestrians all wearing black or gray.Put some color on people, or some reflective tape. It might help the fast driving jerks see you.
People wear black. If you can't see people wearing black, you're driving too fast. Slow down. In the dark? Seriously?
Not to mention the times that I've been out in hi vis, with lights, and people behind the wheel of motor vehicles still apparently couldn't see me...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Were they driving an expensive car? https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/26/world/expensive-car-drivers-study-scli-scn-intl/index.html
This has something to do with it.
As well as pedestrians all wearing black or gray.Put some color on people, or some reflective tape. It might help the fast driving jerks see you.