Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Come back with an update 2 years from now after doing keto.
Why? I’ve been doing keto/a little looser low carb (more like 40-50g for maintenance) for years now and it is not difficult. It is second nature now and feels great. I normally don’t believe in nutrition science, but I have a gluten intolerance and it just feels so much better not to eat grains of any sort. I eat so many wings, burgers, etc. that I can always, always find something to eat and not feel deprived.
Anonymous wrote:Apple is not a crappy snack. You need to change your disordered relationships with food.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apple is not a crappy snack. You need to change your disordered relationships with food.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We seriously need a new forum about this. There’s a post similar to this every day.
you are eating fewer calories so you are losing weight.
+1
That's all it is. It's great that it's working, but 'eat less move more' is and has always been the gold standard.
But eating less on a consistent basis is HARD. It is very hard in fact - very few people lose weight and stay there.
People like me like IF because it makes eating less easier and therefore sustainable. I am not sure if it's biology or psychology, probably a combination of both. But here are the facts: I was a person who would eat a "healthy" meal at 12 and then despair that a crappy snack (apple) is 3 hours away. It felt impossible to wait so long (and for what) and I would often break down and binge. I can now easily go 20 hours without food (though I am not forcing myself - it just happens sometimes). I just don't think about food that much - and that alone is a life-saver. I also don't feel particularly hungry - I would register hunger maybe once during 20 hours. (I am OP of the other thread).
That's great that it's working for you and I genuinely mean that. But posts like yours are why people say it's a form of disordered eating / for people who can't self-regulate. if you 'despair' about a 'crappy snack' and binge eat, you don't have a healthy relationship with food. Not sure why so many IF'ers refuse to acknowledge that.
Anonymous wrote:Apple is not a crappy snack. You need to change your disordered relationships with food.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We seriously need a new forum about this. There’s a post similar to this every day.
you are eating fewer calories so you are losing weight.
+1
That's all it is. It's great that it's working, but 'eat less move more' is and has always been the gold standard.
But eating less on a consistent basis is HARD. It is very hard in fact - very few people lose weight and stay there.
People like me like IF because it makes eating less easier and therefore sustainable. I am not sure if it's biology or psychology, probably a combination of both. But here are the facts: I was a person who would eat a "healthy" meal at 12 and then despair that a crappy snack (apple) is 3 hours away. It felt impossible to wait so long (and for what) and I would often break down and binge. I can now easily go 20 hours without food (though I am not forcing myself - it just happens sometimes). I just don't think about food that much - and that alone is a life-saver. I also don't feel particularly hungry - I would register hunger maybe once during 20 hours. (I am OP of the other thread).
That's great that it's working for you and I genuinely mean that. But posts like yours are why people say it's a form of disordered eating / for people who can't self-regulate. if you 'despair' about a 'crappy snack' and binge eat, you don't have a healthy relationship with food. Not sure why so many IF'ers refuse to acknowledge that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We seriously need a new forum about this. There’s a post similar to this every day.
you are eating fewer calories so you are losing weight.
+1
That's all it is. It's great that it's working, but 'eat less move more' is and has always been the gold standard.
But eating less on a consistent basis is HARD. It is very hard in fact - very few people lose weight and stay there.
People like me like IF because it makes eating less easier and therefore sustainable. I am not sure if it's biology or psychology, probably a combination of both. But here are the facts: I was a person who would eat a "healthy" meal at 12 and then despair that a crappy snack (apple) is 3 hours away. It felt impossible to wait so long (and for what) and I would often break down and binge. I can now easily go 20 hours without food (though I am not forcing myself - it just happens sometimes). I just don't think about food that much - and that alone is a life-saver. I also don't feel particularly hungry - I would register hunger maybe once during 20 hours. (I am OP of the other thread).
That's great that it's working for you and I genuinely mean that. But posts like yours are why people say it's a form of disordered eating / for people who can't self-regulate. if you 'despair' about a 'crappy snack' and binge eat, you don't have a healthy relationship with food. Not sure why so many IF'ers refuse to acknowledge that.
Anonymous wrote:I hope you can stick to it for the rest of your life.
I've been doing low-carb IF for ten years now. There's nothing to think about any more. It's just part of the daily routine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We seriously need a new forum about this. There’s a post similar to this every day.
you are eating fewer calories so you are losing weight.
+1
That's all it is. It's great that it's working, but 'eat less move more' is and has always been the gold standard.
But eating less on a consistent basis is HARD. It is very hard in fact - very few people lose weight and stay there.
People like me like IF because it makes eating less easier and therefore sustainable. I am not sure if it's biology or psychology, probably a combination of both. But here are the facts: I was a person who would eat a "healthy" meal at 12 and then despair that a crappy snack (apple) is 3 hours away. It felt impossible to wait so long (and for what) and I would often break down and binge. I can now easily go 20 hours without food (though I am not forcing myself - it just happens sometimes). I just don't think about food that much - and that alone is a life-saver. I also don't feel particularly hungry - I would register hunger maybe once during 20 hours. (I am OP of the other thread).
Anonymous wrote:Come back with an update 2 years from now after doing keto.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We seriously need a new forum about this. There’s a post similar to this every day.
you are eating fewer calories so you are losing weight.
+1
That's all it is. It's great that it's working, but 'eat less move more' is and has always been the gold standard.
I hope you can stick to it for the rest of your life.
Anonymous wrote:We seriously need a new forum about this. There’s a post similar to this every day.
you are eating fewer calories so you are losing weight.