Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

Yeah and his economic output is sub 0. He's been a leach for his entire career. Never produced growth in his life.

You can say the same thing about Trump. How many times has Bernie declared bankruptcy?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

A lot of those book sales were from campaign money. $445,000 worth. So one of those homes was bought with the hard-earned $27 from tens of thousands of his supporters.
https://www.greenmountaindaily.com/2019/04/25/bernies-own-book-of-the-month-lub/

Capitalism rocks, if you are in a position of power - you can inflict socialism on the people while rocking capitalism yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having multiple homes is not bad.

Being rich is not bad.

Structuring the entire country so that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer is BAD.

The point you are missing is how hypocritical he is

What exactly is hypocritical about it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

Yeah and his economic output is sub 0. He's been a leach for his entire career. Never produced growth in his life.

+1

The guy started out on welfare. He then was kicked out of a hippie camp due to laziness. He is a career politician who has nothing to show for. His entire life was supported by public dough. He only produces hot air.

Anonymous wrote:Having multiple homes is not bad.

Being rich is not bad.

Structuring the entire country so that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer is BAD.

The point you are missing is how hypocritical he is

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who gives a crap? I can’t stand Bernie, but this focus on his homes is ridiculous. Moreover, those places are not extravagant; in fact, the lake house looks like a dump. The DC place is referred to as an ‘apartment’. Those are townhomes. Does this mean Bernie rents an apartment in someone else’s home? Give it a rest. Focus on Bernie’s ideas, not his homes.

The Lakehouse is valued at $600,000, is waterfront, and has a guest house.

I don’t get it. He earned money. What do you want him to do with it?

He could donate some of it. He is in the top 5 percent of close to it yet donates very little.

So what you’re saying is, he’s poor by DCUM standards.

Anonymous wrote:Who gives a crap? I can’t stand Bernie, but this focus on his homes is ridiculous. Moreover, those places are not extravagant; in fact, the lake house looks like a dump. The DC place is referred to as an ‘apartment’. Those are townhomes. Does this mean Bernie rents an apartment in someone else’s home? Give it a rest. Focus on Bernie’s ideas, not his homes.

It's not too much, but it's too much for a socialist. Bernie is a hypocrite.

According to FEC filings, the Sanders campaign bought thousands of dollars of his books. Sanders spent almost $445,000 of his donors’ campaign funds with Verso Books, the publisher of Outsider in the White House, which was a quick re-working of his earlier Bernie book: Outsider in the House. I mentioned the purchase in a diary: Campaign dollars to donuts back then without really taking aim at it; I don’t recall it making any waves in that long campaign.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

Yeah and his economic output is sub 0. He's been a leach for his entire career. Never produced growth in his life.

In other words, he’s an average politician.

Truly inspiring.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

A lot of those book sales were from campaign money. $445,000 worth. So one of those homes was bought with the hard-earned $27 from tens of thousands of his supporters.
https://www.greenmountaindaily.com/2019/04/25/bernies-own-book-of-the-month-lub/

How do politicians get wealthy?

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

Yeah and his economic output is sub 0. He's been a leach for his entire career. Never produced growth in his life.

In other words, he’s an average politician.

Bingo, Ringo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With so many homeless it's a scandal that wealth inequality allows him to have three.

Oh, please. Bernie has an estimated net worth of about two million dollars, a lot of it from book sales. That is pretty modest by D.C. standards. Most politicians are much more wealthy. A couple of mid-level bureaucrats can amass that kind of money over the course of their working lives. There are plenty of examples of wealth inequality; Bernie is not one of them.

Yeah and his economic output is sub 0. He's been a leach for his entire career. Never produced growth in his life.

In other words, he’s an average politician.