Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After all the hype I was really disappointed with The Lane. $20 per kid for 2 hours is ridiculous because there isn't much for them to do. Its like a trendy bar/coffee shop with a slide and ballpit and should not charge a cover. I won't be going back unless they make it more of a play space. I think they could make enough money on alcohol sales if they didnt charge a cover. There was no relaxation just constantly watching the kids and trying not to get trampled. I had high hopes, sigh. Ill be going to badlands, its cheaper anyway.
How would the degree of relaxation change based on whether there was a cover? You are still going to have to watch the kids either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After all the hype I was really disappointed with The Lane. $20 per kid for 2 hours is ridiculous because there isn't much for them to do. Its like a trendy bar/coffee shop with a slide and ballpit and should not charge a cover. I won't be going back unless they make it more of a play space. I think they could make enough money on alcohol sales if they didnt charge a cover. There was no relaxation just constantly watching the kids and trying not to get trampled. I had high hopes, sigh. Ill be going to badlands, its cheaper anyway.
I don't think some cover charge is unreasonable... but $20 for 2 hours is ridiculous. I also think the time limit is bad marketing, since most people will leave after 2 hours but the firm cap makes it seem less worth it. What they could do is charge $20 per kid, but give you say $10 of it in credit to the coffee shop/bar.
Anonymous wrote:After all the hype I was really disappointed with The Lane. $20 per kid for 2 hours is ridiculous because there isn't much for them to do. Its like a trendy bar/coffee shop with a slide and ballpit and should not charge a cover. I won't be going back unless they make it more of a play space. I think they could make enough money on alcohol sales if they didnt charge a cover. There was no relaxation just constantly watching the kids and trying not to get trampled. I had high hopes, sigh. Ill be going to badlands, its cheaper anyway.
Anonymous wrote:After all the hype I was really disappointed with The Lane. $20 per kid for 2 hours is ridiculous because there isn't much for them to do. Its like a trendy bar/coffee shop with a slide and ballpit and should not charge a cover. I won't be going back unless they make it more of a play space. I think they could make enough money on alcohol sales if they didnt charge a cover. There was no relaxation just constantly watching the kids and trying not to get trampled. I had high hopes, sigh. Ill be going to badlands, its cheaper anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went-- it's a great space, but definitely trends younger. Think let's drink coffee while meeting a few new Mom friends with our toddlers while we fret about the MSDC lottery for our three year olds.
IF anyone wants to go in on a Flight/trampoline type place in the NY Ave corridor for our older kids, I'll put in the first $100k
Yes! We totally need a trampoline park!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can anyone compare The Lane to Skillzone? Sounds very similar.
I'd say Lane is perfect for 3-5 year olds while Skillzone is better for 0-2. Lane is bigger than Skillzone too.
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone compare The Lane to Skillzone? Sounds very similar.
Anonymous wrote:I went-- it's a great space, but definitely trends younger. Think let's drink coffee while meeting a few new Mom friends with our toddlers while we fret about the MSDC lottery for our three year olds.
IF anyone wants to go in on a Flight/trampoline type place in the NY Ave corridor for our older kids, I'll put in the first $100k