Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this is announced, Arlington would be required to have a U16 team.
After U15, the U16 and U17 age groups are combined, so there are no stand alone U16 teams. The top U16 players may roster up to the U17 squad, but most will not.
Most DA programs will try to keep their U16 teams together and play in other leagues for a year. Teams in this area will probably join EDP.
That changed this year, they split these age groups. Only U18/U19 are combined so that Seniors who are 18 do not get trapped without a team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this is announced, Arlington would be required to have a U16 team.
After U15, the U16 and U17 age groups are combined, so there are no stand alone U16 teams. The top U16 players may roster up to the U17 squad, but most will not.
Most DA programs will try to keep their U16 teams together and play in other leagues for a year. Teams in this area will probably join EDP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Perhaps they are optimistic for the 2020-21 season getting full status or have heard some rumors.
Even if Arlington gets "full status" next year, there won't be a U16 DA team--DA doesn't have U16 teams on the boys' side and won't be adding them next year. So, at best, it would be a U17 team with some 2005s playing up (at many DAs, the number of U16s on the U17 team is relatively small, but who knows in a case like this where it would be added from scratch).
And on the original question...last year they announced on March 7th: http://www.ussoccerda.com/20190307-NEWS-DA-Four-New-Clubs-to-Join-Boys-DA-for-201920-Season
Anonymous wrote:
Perhaps they are optimistic for the 2020-21 season getting full status or have heard some rumors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Get their lives back and enjoy high school, at least I hope for their sake.
Play for high school and Arlington Red.
Yes. That’s what the 2004s that aged out of DA at the end of last year (now U16) are doing.
I think they still refer to them as da, even without status.
I am pretty sure they should not. You either are or are not in a DA.
ASA website lists team that do not have DA status yet or no longer have DA status/aged out as “DA” on their website under “DA teams” and coaching staff.
It’s a little misleading for prospective players/parents not familiar with the Club. They still refer to u16s as DA even though they don’t have DA status.
Perhaps they are optimistic for the 2020-21 season getting full status or have heard some rumors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Get their lives back and enjoy high school, at least I hope for their sake.
Play for high school and Arlington Red.
Yes. That’s what the 2004s that aged out of DA at the end of last year (now U16) are doing.
I think they still refer to them as da, even without status.
I am pretty sure they should not. You either are or are not in a DA.
ASA website lists team that do not have DA status yet or no longer have DA status/aged out as “DA” on their website under “DA teams” and coaching staff.
It’s a little misleading for prospective players/parents not familiar with the Club. They still refer to u16s as DA even though they don’t have DA status.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Get their lives back and enjoy high school, at least I hope for their sake.
Play for high school and Arlington Red.
Yes. That’s what the 2004s that aged out of DA at the end of last year (now U16) are doing.
I think they still refer to them as da, even without status.
I am pretty sure they should not. You either are or are not in a DA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Get their lives back and enjoy high school, at least I hope for their sake.
Play for high school and Arlington Red.
Yes. That’s what the 2004s that aged out of DA at the end of last year (now U16) are doing.
I think they still refer to them as da, even without status.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Get their lives back and enjoy high school, at least I hope for their sake.
Play for high school and Arlington Red.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Get their lives back and enjoy high school, at least I hope for their sake.
Anonymous wrote:What are Arlington U15 DA players planning to do next year if club does not get U16 DA?
Anonymous wrote:Someone once told me a number of DC United players came from DC and PG County but not sure if that is the case. Those would seem to be the areas least served when DC moved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we stop with SYC already. They will never be considered for DA.
Why would they ever be considered?
Because they actually develop boys into really good teams, are in an ideal location, and have committed like other groups to academies for earlier ages and futsal (like a few other area clubs). In other words, pretty much the opposite of Arlington pre-DA on the youth side. Why on earth do we think something as dysfunctional as the USSDA system would ever be interested in an idea like that? Until we stop thinking about soccer as an upper middle class sport in America, we're not going to do any better on the boys side of the ledger.
Is this with the new director who has been there a year?
Maybe SYC is following Alexandria’s approach to come on here for marketing purposes?
Huh? So everything said might be correct, but it is irrelevant?
LOL. Everything correct - please. Random statement of we (SYC) develop boys - support it. Ideal location - stuck between 3 current DA clubs, no real facilities, and traffic ground zero - how is that ideal? We do futsal and young kid training - like everybody else in the region, so what. Direct dig at arlington, why - pretty sure they don’t care about you. Why are you going out of your way to attack them? Dysfunctional Boys USSDA league? Please, the Boys DA is unequivocally the best boys league in the nation. Are they dysfunctional because SYC is not on their radar? The league works well and has indeed concentrated talent where it can be seen. Finally, boys soccer is bad at the national level because you say it is a upper middle class sport? You clearly need to look at the background of the players at the National level - they are not upper middle class products. So nothing really seems correct in the statement so it is probably irrelevant. But hey, SYC is clearly the solution.