Anonymous wrote:Back to the question at hand:
The school has done a good job of becoming a good neighbor within the community. The school is not perfect, however, it is growing, and my child is safe and happy to be a part of that community.
To be noted is that the student population is diverse, and many of the children in my child's class are members of middle-class families with parents who have degrees, some of which are post-graduate. Also, several parents are teachers at other schools.
I say take a peek for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Well that poster seemed to at least be talking about any high school student in Ward 7, which I agree is racist all things considered.
Disagree.
Did not say every high school student was dealing drugs, committing crimes, or in gangs. But you are naive if you don’t think some high school students are not involved with these things. Every high school probably has these problems but the prevalence is higher in ward 7 as we all know.
You're right they did not say it outright, but it was totally implied by the statement. What else can we glean from her statement other than high school students in Ward 7 are bad people who can't even be local to younger children? If the only thing you know or are commenting about a school is that a high school is down the block from it, maybe you can withhold your comment on this thread and let people with any real knowledge answer the OP's question? It's definitely racism toward those high school kids but continue to defend if you want to.
I know families who have big reservations about sending their elementary kids to schools with middle school kids. So yes, the information that it’s next to a high school is informative and useful to some people.
How do I know because I know a family who did just that. They pulled their kid out after 1 year and the middle school kids was a factor in this decision.
Fine point, except the high school is completely separate from the elementary school and down the street. There's absolutely no interaction between the schools unless the high school kids are coming in to read to the young children. Some of you have such a terrible view of the world, and protect your kids too much, when they get to reality they won't be ready and they will come to blame you for how you raised them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Well that poster seemed to at least be talking about any high school student in Ward 7, which I agree is racist all things considered.
Disagree.
Did not say every high school student was dealing drugs, committing crimes, or in gangs. But you are naive if you don’t think some high school students are not involved with these things. Every high school probably has these problems but the prevalence is higher in ward 7 as we all know.
You're right they did not say it outright, but it was totally implied by the statement. What else can we glean from her statement other than high school students in Ward 7 are bad people who can't even be local to younger children? If the only thing you know or are commenting about a school is that a high school is down the block from it, maybe you can withhold your comment on this thread and let people with any real knowledge answer the OP's question? It's definitely racism toward those high school kids but continue to defend if you want to.
I know families who have big reservations about sending their elementary kids to schools with middle school kids. So yes, the information that it’s next to a high school is informative and useful to some people.
How do I know because I know a family who did just that. They pulled their kid out after 1 year and the middle school kids was a factor in this decision.
Fine point, except the high school is completely separate from the elementary school and down the street. There's absolutely no interaction between the schools unless the high school kids are coming in to read to the young children. Some of you have such a terrible view of the world, and protect your kids too much, when they get to reality they won't be ready and they will come to blame you for how you raised them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Well that poster seemed to at least be talking about any high school student in Ward 7, which I agree is racist all things considered.
Disagree.
Did not say every high school student was dealing drugs, committing crimes, or in gangs. But you are naive if you don’t think some high school students are not involved with these things. Every high school probably has these problems but the prevalence is higher in ward 7 as we all know.
You're right they did not say it outright, but it was totally implied by the statement. What else can we glean from her statement other than high school students in Ward 7 are bad people who can't even be local to younger children? If the only thing you know or are commenting about a school is that a high school is down the block from it, maybe you can withhold your comment on this thread and let people with any real knowledge answer the OP's question? It's definitely racism toward those high school kids but continue to defend if you want to.
I know families who have big reservations about sending their elementary kids to schools with middle school kids. So yes, the information that it’s next to a high school is informative and useful to some people.
How do I know because I know a family who did just that. They pulled their kid out after 1 year and the middle school kids was a factor in this decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Well that poster seemed to at least be talking about any high school student in Ward 7, which I agree is racist all things considered.
Disagree.
Did not say every high school student was dealing drugs, committing crimes, or in gangs. But you are naive if you don’t think some high school students are not involved with these things. Every high school probably has these problems but the prevalence is higher in ward 7 as we all know.
You're right they did not say it outright, but it was totally implied by the statement. What else can we glean from her statement other than high school students in Ward 7 are bad people who can't even be local to younger children? If the only thing you know or are commenting about a school is that a high school is down the block from it, maybe you can withhold your comment on this thread and let people with any real knowledge answer the OP's question? It's definitely racism toward those high school kids but continue to defend if you want to.
Anonymous wrote:As the OP, I understand the dynamics in Ward 7, since I live in Ward 7. Some areas of Ward 7 are very nice and safe with great community, and some areas do have more issues. I do always check the DC Crime Map, if I feel uncertain about an area, as well as visit the area, to provide insight. The results in some areas of Ward 7 would likely be surprising to many.
Since we all want what is best for our children, what I really appreciate is honest feedback about the school, so thank you to those few posters who have provided feedback regarding the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Well that poster seemed to at least be talking about any high school student in Ward 7, which I agree is racist all things considered.
Disagree.
Did not say every high school student was dealing drugs, committing crimes, or in gangs. But you are naive if you don’t think some high school students are not involved with these things. Every high school probably has these problems but the prevalence is higher in ward 7 as we all know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Well that poster seemed to at least be talking about any high school student in Ward 7, which I agree is racist all things considered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.
This is hilarious. A comment was made about crime being higher in that ward and poster above then makes the false jump that the post was talking trash about a whole ward and that everyone there are criminals, etc...and racist.
Uh no, PP, you are injecting your interpretation of the comment above. No one else is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids are next to a high school in one of the worst wards in the city in regards to drugs, crime, gangs, etc.....It would never even be a consideration for our family.
Do you not realize that actual people live there? There is crime all over this city, and some people can’t afford to live somewhere else. What makes you think that the students would be unsafe being in the school building? The temporary location is right next to a rec center and is pretty difficult to enter. This comment just seems like one big micro-aggression.
It is true that crime is higher in that ward. It’s also true that some parents would not send their 3 year old there. You may but others make different choices.
I really don't think that Stokes created "East End" to serve those who do not live in the east end, so it really doesn't matter what you think. You can't really expect to talk trash about an entire ward and not offend the people who live there (who are not uniformly criminals and fools by the way). It's also kinda racist. Some people.