Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SWS's principal is actually hoping the school will swing to trailers; unclear where those trailers will be located. So if that doesn't bother you, go for it? Unclear how the kids will get PE indoors in that case. And as another posted said, construction will last two years, not one.
An alrington school had a reno and there was a trailer gym. It was an actual relocate able classroom designed to be a gym...think doublewide trailer. It was crazy.
Anonymous wrote:SWS's principal is actually hoping the school will swing to trailers; unclear where those trailers will be located. So if that doesn't bother you, go for it? Unclear how the kids will get PE indoors in that case. And as another posted said, construction will last two years, not one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does swing space mean? Sooo many terms on this board trying to follow. TIA!
Swing space is the location a school's student body relocates to during the modernization process. In other words, a school is being renovated and the building can't be used for 1-2 years. DCPS will temporarily house the school on a swing space. Could be an old school that is no longer in use or trailers.
Anonymous wrote:What does swing space mean? Sooo many terms on this board trying to follow. TIA!
Anonymous wrote:Any updates on where the swing space is going?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All I can say is that I hated "Maury Village" so very much.
Why did you hate it, exactly?
DP. It was pretty ugly from the outside, but other than that, really NBD. The trailers were fine, did not impact teaching and learning. The biggest issue was being co-located with an active construction site, so in that sense, a swing site might be preferable. But I definitely appreciated not having to change my commute that much, so all in all, an ok solution. And CERTAINLY not worth changing your lottery choice to avoid!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All I can say is that I hated "Maury Village" so very much.
Why did you hate it, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:We are inbounds for Peabody/Watkins and entering the PK4 lottery this year. For PK3 we listed (in this order): (1) SWS, (2) Two Rivers 4th, (3) Two Rivers Young, (4) Peabody. We did not get into any of those options (waitlisted at Peabody in the 30s), but we knew that was a possibility and were okay with it because we were happy with our private daycare and, with a new baby, felt that having the same drop-off location would also be helpful.
This year, I'm planning to list the same 4 options for PK4; however, I wonder if SWS is really worth a year of swing space? I realize this can be hard to measure/quantify, but I suppose I'm just looking for input from current and prior families? I am loathe to commute all over the city with my kid (or have her on a bus for a long time), but perhaps it is worth it for the continued spot? And yes, I know that the chances of getting in are slim to begin with, but, if it is worth it, why not list it?
Anonymous wrote:All I can say is that I hated "Maury Village" so very much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SWS's principal is actually hoping the school will swing to trailers; unclear where those trailers will be located. So if that doesn't bother you, go for it? Unclear how the kids will get PE indoors in that case. And as another posted said, construction will last two years, not one.
Of course he doesn’t want his school destroyed like CHML was. I think people seriously underestimate how terrible 1.5 hours/day on a bus is a for 3 year old if they think that could even remotely be doable for 2 years.