Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we rezone white oak to PG?
It's a good thing that I keep reading on DCUM that people who oppose the boundary analysis aren't racists, because otherwise I would classify this as a racist statement.
Anonymous wrote:Can we rezone white oak to PG?
Anonymous wrote:Can we rezone white oak to PG?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are there parents who want to bus kids from one area to another for schools? Honest question. As in either from a lower income area to a higher and vice versa? That being for the goal to increase diversity at all schools.
No. No one wants their kid to be bussed. However, some of us realize that, whether for overcrowding reasons or other reasons, it isn't possible to send your kid to the closest school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are there parents who want to bus kids from one area to another for schools? Honest question. As in either from a lower income area to a higher and vice versa? That being for the goal to increase diversity at all schools.
No. No one wants their kid to be bussed. However, some of us realize that, whether for overcrowding reasons or other reasons, it isn't possible to send your kid to the closest school.
Although it might be possible. And doing an analysis of the possibilities is a good thing to do.
Yup. My understanding is that's all this analysis is doing. It will produce an overview of school utilization based on the 4 factors outlined in the proposal. It won't even include boundary recommendations. That's further down the line. And yet, people are flipping out, as though they're being asked to bus their kid 45 minutes away to inner Detroit tomorrow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are there parents who want to bus kids from one area to another for schools? Honest question. As in either from a lower income area to a higher and vice versa? That being for the goal to increase diversity at all schools.
No. No one wants their kid to be bussed. However, some of us realize that, whether for overcrowding reasons or other reasons, it isn't possible to send your kid to the closest school.
Although it might be possible. And doing an analysis of the possibilities is a good thing to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are there parents who want to bus kids from one area to another for schools? Honest question. As in either from a lower income area to a higher and vice versa? That being for the goal to increase diversity at all schools.
No. No one wants their kid to be bussed. However, some of us realize that, whether for overcrowding reasons or other reasons, it isn't possible to send your kid to the closest school.
Anonymous wrote:So are there parents who want to bus kids from one area to another for schools? Honest question. As in either from a lower income area to a higher and vice versa? That being for the goal to increase diversity at all schools.
Anonymous wrote:So are there parents who want to bus kids from one area to another for schools? Honest question. As in either from a lower income area to a higher and vice versa? That being for the goal to increase diversity at all schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are those passionate, honor-bound parents from that Facebook group going to come to White Oak MS and try to ruin that meeting, too?
Who knows. I'm considering going to try to be a voice of reason, but I also don't want to become a target of theirs.
I get that. But someone has to stand up to bullies.I can't go to the White Oak meeting, but I'm going to go to a different one.
Bullies as in the MC BOE?