Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how uniforms save you money. Don’t your kids change when they get home? I can’t imagine mine my son hanging out in a polo all night. He often does something active in the evening and is in the same clothes he went to school in since he doesn’t wear a uniform and dresses in casual clothes. Same for DD.
My middle school son changes out of his uniform when he gets home, but it doesn't have to be into the latest and greatest style as he would probably want to wear to the public school. He can rewear things frequently at home. Often the change is in to sports clothes for a practice after school.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how uniforms save you money. Don’t your kids change when they get home? I can’t imagine mine my son hanging out in a polo all night. He often does something active in the evening and is in the same clothes he went to school in since he doesn’t wear a uniform and dresses in casual clothes. Same for DD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Uniform is cheaper as long as they don't require school logos. With logos, a polo shirt goes from 4 to 20.
You also still need at least a week or two worth of casual clothes for the breaks in school.
So, the uniforms are actually more expensive, since I would have to buy them in addition to the clothing I normally buy. Even if the uniform is inexpensive, it is still an additional expense, not a substitution. My children do not currently have a separate school wardrobe.
Anonymous wrote:I wish public school here do uniform. It is a lot cheaper, and no kids or parents feel any pressure of not dressing right for styles or unnamed brand. That is one less peer pressure.
Anonymous wrote:My son goes to a school that has uniform. I have to say though, on casual dress days (once a month), it seems a lot more chaotic. I do think uniform has some sort of a calming effect.