Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sibley is truly wonderful. I've visited friends who delivered at GWU, and while I don't doubt they received excellent care, Sibley just felt so much more relaxed, peaceful and luxurious compared to the always-rushing vibe of GWU with tiny rooms and too many docs.
I've had all three children at Sibley. Two vaginal deliveries, one C-section. Always received excellent care, L&D nurses are fantastic, postpartum care is great, food can be better of course but what are you going to do. Regarding high-risk deliveries, my last baby came just after 34 weeks and they've managed it very well - the baby NICU is so well run and the nurses are very skilled. They managed to get my 34-weeker to take a bottle - which needed the patience of an angel. In short, would not hesitate to recommend Sibley to anyone. It's a Club Med of hospitals in DC.
Sure, if what's important to you is being in the "club Med, luxury" hospital then Sibley is great. Some of us have other priorities.
Anonymous wrote:Sibley is truly wonderful. I've visited friends who delivered at GWU, and while I don't doubt they received excellent care, Sibley just felt so much more relaxed, peaceful and luxurious compared to the always-rushing vibe of GWU with tiny rooms and too many docs.
I've had all three children at Sibley. Two vaginal deliveries, one C-section. Always received excellent care, L&D nurses are fantastic, postpartum care is great, food can be better of course but what are you going to do. Regarding high-risk deliveries, my last baby came just after 34 weeks and they've managed it very well - the baby NICU is so well run and the nurses are very skilled. They managed to get my 34-weeker to take a bottle - which needed the patience of an angel. In short, would not hesitate to recommend Sibley to anyone. It's a Club Med of hospitals in DC.
Anonymous wrote:
I actually felt that Sibley was safer because it is less busy than the other hospitals and therefore the nurses and doctors are less busy (not to say they are not busy, just not completely overwhelmed). Also, unlike Holy Cross, our alternate option which has a level III NICU, Sibley is not a "Baby-Friendly" hospital. That means that at Sibley the baby won't be denied formula when baby is hungry, and mom can rest after giving birth instead of being forced to room-share (it's shown that room-sharing in the hospital leads to babies getting dropped. also it doesn't help with breastfeeding. no thanks).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I gave birth at Sibley and it was a great experience minus the woman screaming while doing the natural birth thing for 8 hours. That said, I would NEVER again. They aren't prepared for anything going wrong. Fairfax INOVA or GW is the best bet.
Agree with this. I don't know why people give birth at Sibley knowing they can't deal with problems with the baby. You have no idea what's going to happen during birth, why would you want to take this chance when there are other hospitals in the area fully equipped to handle any issues with your baby.
There is no way to know you are not going to have problems. Absolutely no way.
My understanding is they have a special care nursery staffed with neonatologists 24 hours (a level II NICU) which can deal with some problems. Otherwise they send the baby to Georgetown. So I don't think the statement "they can't deal with problems with the baby" is entirely accurate. What is that based on?
Correct. I had a 36 seeker that spent s couple days in NICU and it was fine. Agree you wouldn’t want to go to sibley if you’re high risk but if not, I don’t see why you wouldn’t. PP. it’s about calculated risk. It’s not practical to take the most risk avoidant approach in every aspect of your life. Don’t you drive a car?
I don't calculate risk with my life or my baby. They don't have what an OB would need in a worst case scenario. High risk or not, I wouldn't do it again. I say this after many years if working with OBs that educated me on why they choose to not accept bribes to go to sub par hospitals (that's really a thing).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I gave birth at Sibley and it was a great experience minus the woman screaming while doing the natural birth thing for 8 hours. That said, I would NEVER again. They aren't prepared for anything going wrong. Fairfax INOVA or GW is the best bet.
Agree with this. I don't know why people give birth at Sibley knowing they can't deal with problems with the baby. You have no idea what's going to happen during birth, why would you want to take this chance when there are other hospitals in the area fully equipped to handle any issues with your baby.
There is no way to know you are not going to have problems. Absolutely no way.
My understanding is they have a special care nursery staffed with neonatologists 24 hours (a level II NICU) which can deal with some problems. Otherwise they send the baby to Georgetown. So I don't think the statement "they can't deal with problems with the baby" is entirely accurate. What is that based on?
Correct. I had a 36 seeker that spent s couple days in NICU and it was fine. Agree you wouldn’t want to go to sibley if you’re high risk but if not, I don’t see why you wouldn’t. PP. it’s about calculated risk. It’s not practical to take the most risk avoidant approach in every aspect of your life. Don’t you drive a car?
You can't compare it to driving a car but you can compare it to driving a car rated not great for safety versus one rated high for safety. I just don't understand why you would take a risk with your child when you don't have to? There are so many hospitals to choose from with high level NICUS. There is 0 reason to choose Sibley. If it was the only hospital in a 20 mile radius it would be more understandable.
OP, ignore this person, unless you are a higher risk patient or have underlying anxiety reasons.
So you think everyone needs to give birth at a hospital with a level 1 NICU?? We aren’t exactly talking about homebirths here, Sibley is part of Johns Hopkins?? This isn’t some podunk hospital. I mean this kindly but do you have postpartum anxiety? Because this isn’t remotely rational. Would you also not get an epidural because of the 0.000001% chance of something bad happening?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I gave birth at Sibley and it was a great experience minus the woman screaming while doing the natural birth thing for 8 hours. That said, I would NEVER again. They aren't prepared for anything going wrong. Fairfax INOVA or GW is the best bet.
Agree with this. I don't know why people give birth at Sibley knowing they can't deal with problems with the baby. You have no idea what's going to happen during birth, why would you want to take this chance when there are other hospitals in the area fully equipped to handle any issues with your baby.
There is no way to know you are not going to have problems. Absolutely no way.
My understanding is they have a special care nursery staffed with neonatologists 24 hours (a level II NICU) which can deal with some problems. Otherwise they send the baby to Georgetown. So I don't think the statement "they can't deal with problems with the baby" is entirely accurate. What is that based on?
Correct. I had a 36 seeker that spent s couple days in NICU and it was fine. Agree you wouldn’t want to go to sibley if you’re high risk but if not, I don’t see why you wouldn’t. PP. it’s about calculated risk. It’s not practical to take the most risk avoidant approach in every aspect of your life. Don’t you drive a car?
You can't compare it to driving a car but you can compare it to driving a car rated not great for safety versus one rated high for safety. I just don't understand why you would take a risk with your child when you don't have to? There are so many hospitals to choose from with high level NICUS. There is 0 reason to choose Sibley. If it was the only hospital in a 20 mile radius it would be more understandable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I gave birth at Sibley and it was a great experience minus the woman screaming while doing the natural birth thing for 8 hours. That said, I would NEVER again. They aren't prepared for anything going wrong. Fairfax INOVA or GW is the best bet.
Agree with this. I don't know why people give birth at Sibley knowing they can't deal with problems with the baby. You have no idea what's going to happen during birth, why would you want to take this chance when there are other hospitals in the area fully equipped to handle any issues with your baby.
There is no way to know you are not going to have problems. Absolutely no way.
My understanding is they have a special care nursery staffed with neonatologists 24 hours (a level II NICU) which can deal with some problems. Otherwise they send the baby to Georgetown. So I don't think the statement "they can't deal with problems with the baby" is entirely accurate. What is that based on?
Correct. I had a 36 seeker that spent s couple days in NICU and it was fine. Agree you wouldn’t want to go to sibley if you’re high risk but if not, I don’t see why you wouldn’t. PP. it’s about calculated risk. It’s not practical to take the most risk avoidant approach in every aspect of your life. Don’t you drive a car?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I gave birth at Sibley and it was a great experience minus the woman screaming while doing the natural birth thing for 8 hours. That said, I would NEVER again. They aren't prepared for anything going wrong. Fairfax INOVA or GW is the best bet.
Agree with this. I don't know why people give birth at Sibley knowing they can't deal with problems with the baby. You have no idea what's going to happen during birth, why would you want to take this chance when there are other hospitals in the area fully equipped to handle any issues with your baby.
There is no way to know you are not going to have problems. Absolutely no way.
My understanding is they have a special care nursery staffed with neonatologists 24 hours (a level II NICU) which can deal with some problems. Otherwise they send the baby to Georgetown. So I don't think the statement "they can't deal with problems with the baby" is entirely accurate. What is that based on?
Correct. I had a 36 seeker that spent s couple days in NICU and it was fine. Agree you wouldn’t want to go to sibley if you’re high risk but if not, I don’t see why you wouldn’t. PP. it’s about calculated risk. It’s not practical to take the most risk avoidant approach in every aspect of your life. Don’t you drive a car?