Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh come on. I have a PhD in organic chemistry that took 5.5 years of 60+ hour weeks and I don't ask people to call me Dr.Anonymous wrote:An EdD can be a difficult degree to get. I watched my mom earn one. She had to change thesis advisors so that she didn't have to write a 'fourth' thesis to complete the degree, due to the many changes of course her advisor proposed. This was at a well known private university graduate program.
You think somebody with an EdD degree that studies and advances education for women in 3rd world countries should not be called Dr.? But because you can apparently make sure beer in 1 brewery is exactly the same as beer at the 2nd brewery, you are better?
Anonymous wrote:Oh come on. I have a PhD in organic chemistry that took 5.5 years of 60+ hour weeks and I don't ask people to call me Dr.Anonymous wrote:An EdD can be a difficult degree to get. I watched my mom earn one. She had to change thesis advisors so that she didn't have to write a 'fourth' thesis to complete the degree, due to the many changes of course her advisor proposed. This was at a well known private university graduate program.
Oh come on. I have a PhD in organic chemistry that took 5.5 years of 60+ hour weeks and I don't ask people to call me Dr.Anonymous wrote:An EdD can be a difficult degree to get. I watched my mom earn one. She had to change thesis advisors so that she didn't have to write a 'fourth' thesis to complete the degree, due to the many changes of course her advisor proposed. This was at a well known private university graduate program.
Anonymous wrote:I was out of the workforce for about 15 years, then finished my bachelor's and master's at the end of my SAHM tenure, so I'm not sure if this a recent phenom or I'm just more perceptive of it after a run-in with one of these types.
It began with a professional peer my age randomly adding "Dr." to their internal email. I got wind folks directly under this person were ordered (and corrected) to address them as "Dr. so-and-so" moving forward. "Dr." was added to their desk, board meeting and office door name plates. According to LinkedIn, the "doctorate" was picked up from Walden University, which I had never heard of:
Walden University is an online for-profit university and Public Benefit Corporation headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
I was suddenly a credential skeptic. Now I notice so many folks have shaky credentials picked up online (often from cyber for-profit schools) or from hybrid online/weekend pay-as-you-go non-selective programs at good universities that could pass as solid to masses. The persons (who are often dumb as bricks) use these credentials for end-all-be-all superiority. I noticed a correlation between lettered credentials after their name in their email signatures to lack of selectivity of the program they were in.
Does it just not matter where you get degrees anymore, it's just become a box-checking exercise for promotions and raises? I'm not being a snob, my degrees are from a barely top 100 university we lived near.
I had a 5th grade teacher who got an Ed.D. and insisted on being called Dr. Cxxx. I thought it was ridiculous even then.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A person who has a Ph.D. and demands to be addressed as Dr. is a jerk regardless of where they earned or bought their degree (the exception is an academic context where all Ph.D. are referred to as Dr.).
I'm the OP. The specific person I mentioned does not have an (online) PhD, it's another type of doctorate.
I think the same holds true for an Ed.D. or D.C.J. or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like others have said, there's a big difference between for-profit schools and less selective, but fully legitimate, schools. Stop being elitist.
What do you mean by big difference, especially as it relates to the "doctor" mentioned in OP? The professional peer says what they have *is* on par with any other doctorate program. Walden University appears to be accredited. How would you treat or interact with this Walden "doctor"?
An institution can be accredited, but if it's for-profit, the incentives are still to seek profit as opposed to educating students. You can read for yourself about why that's problematic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A person who has a Ph.D. and demands to be addressed as Dr. is a jerk regardless of where they earned or bought their degree (the exception is an academic context where all Ph.D. are referred to as Dr.).
I'm the OP. The specific person I mentioned does not have an (online) PhD, it's another type of doctorate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like others have said, there's a big difference between for-profit schools and less selective, but fully legitimate, schools. Stop being elitist.
What do you mean by big difference, especially as it relates to the "doctor" mentioned in OP? The professional peer says what they have *is* on par with any other doctorate program. Walden University appears to be accredited. How would you treat or interact with this Walden "doctor"?