Anonymous wrote:I mean, parents advocated for their kids to be in inclusive mainstream schools and classes. Cake, meet eating it too.
What’s the alternative? Leave them in the classroom when having a meltdown where they could harm another student? Placing them in the hall won’t work, either. Trying to transport them to the office could cause big injuries because teachers cannot touch them. Honestly, while horrific sounding, these rooms seem like the best option.
My SIL has had her fingers and wrist broken on 3 separate occasions by out of control kids. Not many people outside of athletes can say that’s happened to them at work. There are absolutely kids who spend hours in these rooms because there is no other alternative according to her. Even the behavioral specialists cannot deescalate some kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wtf? One of the examples is a kid who wet his pants in the seclusion room and then pooped and was then left naked for almost an hour to run around swearing poop all over while the aide watched from outside and took notes.
This happened to a female student in my friend’s school. At one point, she was naked and covered in poop without so much as a blanket in the AC. My friend quit the next day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not a fan of these spaces. My kid is in a self contained program and lacks the skills to deescalate himself. Often the quiet room is the safest place for him for everyone involved.
Yes the school and his therapy teams are working to try and teach him the necessary skills, but in the moment of crisis is not the time to do it. My son needs to explode before he can begin to calm himself.
I get a minute by minute report any time he is in the quiet room. It doesn’t thrill me but in the moment, I’m not sure what alternatives the school has. When incidents happen at home, he goes to his room where he can scream and hit without harming any family members. My son has never told me that he was not let out of the quiet room when he was able to ask in a calm voice.
What does his medical team say? Medical doctors not psychologists
The pediatrician referred me to a child psychiatrist who evaluated him and provided medication and a referral to a child psychologist. There is no blood work test that can be done to dx mental illness. “Tests” are just observations of behaviors. My son has been in and out of psychiatric hospitals to try and adjust his meds to help him regulate his emotions. I’m confident in the MDs that treated him in the child psychiatric hospital.
Anonymous wrote:Wtf? One of the examples is a kid who wet his pants in the seclusion room and then pooped and was then left naked for almost an hour to run around swearing poop all over while the aide watched from outside and took notes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the alternative? I'm not being snarky. Restraining the child? Medicating the child? A lot of these kids are physically harming the teacher or other students. Obviously if they aren't a harm to others they shouldn't be in this room, but plenty of the kids are a harm to others.
If you read the article, it gets used a lot where that's not the issue.
And I would say how it is used is, if anything, likely to increase problem behavior in kids. Where's the functional behavioral assessment? Where's looking at the antecedents of behaviors? Where's the evaluating what level of service a particular child needs? Where's the positive behavioral support in holding the threat of the "blue room" over kids' heads?
How well would it work to raise your kids if from the moment they got up they were being reminded that one false step and they would be confided to an empty room?
It is astonishing that schools continue to get away with using these practices in the same manner that would get a residential treatment facility a failing accreditation grade and put into corrective action.
I also got the impression that in some of these cases you have staff that likes to pile on the punishment. Kid goes into seclusion. Somehow that just doesn't feel like enough punishment, so require a written apology/extend the time served/look for a reason to send him back in.
BTW I had a kid with behavioral issues, learned that restaining an confining him just made matters worse, and developed other responses. For a time he was in an RTC, where it turned out they were using seclusion but NOT documenting it as the law required; I brought the state and the accreditation people (JCAHO) down on them. I also found they had failed their previous accreditation in regard to seclusion and restraint. At least in those contexts there are standards which have the potential of an entity losing licensing and money.
I know what it feels like to be a parent and find out this has been happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the alternative? I'm not being snarky. Restraining the child? Medicating the child? A lot of these kids are physically harming the teacher or other students. Obviously if they aren't a harm to others they shouldn't be in this room, but plenty of the kids are a harm to others.
If you read the article, it gets used a lot where that's not the issue.
And I would say how it is used is, if anything, likely to increase problem behavior in kids. Where's the functional behavioral assessment? Where's looking at the antecedents of behaviors? Where's the evaluating what level of service a particular child needs? Where's the positive behavioral support in holding the threat of the "blue room" over kids' heads?
How well would it work to raise your kids if from the moment they got up they were being reminded that one false step and they would be confided to an empty room?
It is astonishing that schools continue to get away with using these practices in the same manner that would get a residential treatment facility a failing accreditation grade and put into corrective action.
I also got the impression that in some of these cases you have staff that likes to pile on the punishment. Kid goes into seclusion. Somehow that just doesn't feel like enough punishment, so require a written apology/extend the time served/look for a reason to send him back in.
BTW I had a kid with behavioral issues, learned that restaining an confining him just made matters worse, and developed other responses. For a time he was in an RTC, where it turned out they were using seclusion but NOT documenting it as the law required; I brought the state and the accreditation people (JCAHO) down on them. I also found they had failed their previous accreditation in regard to seclusion and restraint. At least in those contexts there are standards which have the potential of an entity losing licensing and money.
I know what it feels like to be a parent and find out this has been happening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not a fan of these spaces. My kid is in a self contained program and lacks the skills to deescalate himself. Often the quiet room is the safest place for him for everyone involved.
Yes the school and his therapy teams are working to try and teach him the necessary skills, but in the moment of crisis is not the time to do it. My son needs to explode before he can begin to calm himself.
I get a minute by minute report any time he is in the quiet room. It doesn’t thrill me but in the moment, I’m not sure what alternatives the school has. When incidents happen at home, he goes to his room where he can scream and hit without harming any family members. My son has never told me that he was not let out of the quiet room when he was able to ask in a calm voice.
What does his medical team say? Medical doctors not psychologists
Anonymous wrote:What's the alternative? I'm not being snarky. Restraining the child? Medicating the child? A lot of these kids are physically harming the teacher or other students. Obviously if they aren't a harm to others they shouldn't be in this room, but plenty of the kids are a harm to others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the article is missing the other part - if this doesn't work, what does? Where is a system or protocol that keeps everyone safe, de-escalates the situation, allows teachers and students to keep teaching and learning and is not detrimental to kids?
What is the solution?
Safe from ripping up a math paper? IDK.![]()
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a fan of these spaces. My kid is in a self contained program and lacks the skills to deescalate himself. Often the quiet room is the safest place for him for everyone involved.
Yes the school and his therapy teams are working to try and teach him the necessary skills, but in the moment of crisis is not the time to do it. My son needs to explode before he can begin to calm himself.
I get a minute by minute report any time he is in the quiet room. It doesn’t thrill me but in the moment, I’m not sure what alternatives the school has. When incidents happen at home, he goes to his room where he can scream and hit without harming any family members. My son has never told me that he was not let out of the quiet room when he was able to ask in a calm voice.