Anonymous wrote:Excellent idea.
I work as an slp in a maryland title one high poverty, mostly recent immigrant school.
Our school day starts and ends early because of the bus system (730am-2pm). There is a for-pay aftercare program that only 20ish kids attend out of 800 students! Parents simply cannot pay for it.
I have always said with my colleagues that the kids should stay at school at least a few more hours for homework help, sports, snacks, outside play time etc, even extend the school day for an e training hour and pay teachers.
But there is no funding for it.
Good for kids and parents can stay at work or get a job in the first place.
Coukd be a game changer for my school.
Anonymous wrote:With compressed work weeks and telecommuting at an all time high, is there really a demand for this? Maybe a few counties here and there, but overall?
I feel like there are bigger fish to fry. Why not tackle international policy instead? Put forth an environmental initiative? Find a way to reach across the aisle (gasp!).
All these candidates with these weak (and distracting) "ideas" are just beating behind the bush of real world problems.
Anonymous wrote:I can see how this would make a lot of sense for all the reasons listed by PPs. However, I worry that it will create a negative feeling toward school for some kids, especially those who would spend long hours there and don't already have a strong, happy attitude toward school. [/quote
How so? School itself would be the same. The kids who go to after care would just stay and have it at school.
Anonymous wrote:Before and after care will cost less overall if you use the already existing school building for it, and don't need to transport the kids anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:With compressed work weeks and telecommuting at an all time high, is there really a demand for this? Maybe a few counties here and there, but overall?
I feel like there are bigger fish to fry. Why not tackle international policy instead? Put forth an environmental initiative? Find a way to reach across the aisle (gasp!).
All these candidates with these weak (and distracting) "ideas" are just beating behind the bush of real world problems.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the perpetual flip-out of "school isn't daycare". True enough, however there is the reality that most people work 9-5 or some variation on business hours. The school day doesn't take that into account at all so... why not take a more practical approach and try to fix the issue.
What? Are we afraid to make things a little easier?
Anonymous wrote:With compressed work weeks and telecommuting at an all time high, is there really a demand for this? Maybe a few counties here and there, but overall?
I feel like there are bigger fish to fry. Why not tackle international policy instead? Put forth an environmental initiative? Find a way to reach across the aisle (gasp!).
All these candidates with these weak (and distracting) "ideas" are just beating behind the bush of real world problems.
Anonymous wrote:With compressed work weeks and telecommuting at an all time high, is there really a demand for this? Maybe a few counties here and there, but overall?
I feel like there are bigger fish to fry. Why not tackle international policy instead? Put forth an environmental initiative? Find a way to reach across the aisle (gasp!).
All these candidates with these weak (and distracting) "ideas" are just beating behind the bush of real world problems.
Anonymous wrote:It would be done for the benefit of the parents and not the children. Let's be honest about that at least.
Anonymous wrote:It would be done for the benefit of the parents and not the children. Let's be honest about that at least.