Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What constitute "top 10" and why do you want to go "there" - seems pretty superficial when you don't define the schools or compare programs or attributes.
Thought the entire point of TJ WAS to go to a top 10 college!! Especially MIT and Stanford
Anonymous wrote:Also, I don't think SLACs are actively recruiting Asians, but they are actively discriminating against them either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. My son is interested in good premedical programs and is Asian.
Send your kid to a top SLAC that’s strong in the sciences. They love TJ kids and would take those stats in a heartbeat. Your kid will have small classes, be taught by full professors, have great access to internships, not fight grad students for research. And the med school placements are great. Plus, many are actively recruiting Asians.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. My son is interested in good premedical programs and is Asian.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. My son is interested in good premedical programs and is Asian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What constitute "top 10" and why do you want to go "there" - seems pretty superficial when you don't define the schools or compare programs or attributes.
Thought the entire point of TJ WAS to go to a top 10 college!! Especially MIT and Stanford
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not enough information. The odds are different depending on the applicant's race. Don't shoot the messenger; that's just the way it is.
I have a white TJ kid and you need to get off the Asian cross. Kids with B+ in math classes below BC Calc were told by VT they might have tough time getting into VT Engineering this year. It’s tough all over for college admissions. Plenty of 4.4-4.5 white kids getting rejected from the top 10s too. High performing UMC white kids are a dime and dozen in the DMV, and they aren’t taking your DC’s Harvard slot. There are just 100 exceptional kids for every Harvard slot.
Now, any given graduating class at TJ is 1-2% URM and 1-2% FARMs. A top 10% first gen, AA or Hispanic TJ kid could write their own ticket. Because they are unicorns. But that’s not what you meant, is it?
Yes, that is exactly what I meant. To answer the OP's question, the applicants race is an important detail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What constitute "top 10" and why do you want to go "there" - seems pretty superficial when you don't define the schools or compare programs or attributes.
Thought the entire point of TJ WAS to go to a top 10 college!! Especially MIT and Stanford
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it great that we allow private institutions to decide how to assemble a class of students that reflects their institutional goals?
Call it what you want it is still discrimination.
If there are 1000 qualified students and only 50 spaces, then the institution can create any criteria they want to select the 50. It's not discrimination against the other 950 students who don't meet the criteria. Say the school decided they wanted one kids from each state, but 500 kids applied from Maryland. It's not discrimination against Maryland if they still took only 1 student. For any college selection process, you are competing against students most like you. The more unique you are, the better your chances. If TJ was 98% URM and 2% White and Asian, then the White and Asian kids would be the unicorns and would stand out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it great that we allow private institutions to decide how to assemble a class of students that reflects their institutional goals?
Call it what you want it is still discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:What constitute "top 10" and why do you want to go "there" - seems pretty superficial when you don't define the schools or compare programs or attributes.
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it great that we allow private institutions to decide how to assemble a class of students that reflects their institutional goals?