Anonymous wrote:OP here. DH is a professor, and his college belongs to an association of colleges. He and his kids are counting on going to one of these. They will receive a massive break on tuition. All are top tier, some in the top 20 colleges in the country. So there is a range of options the kids should get into, the kids know these are their options and are happy with that. So this is a saving grace.
What gets my goat is that DH's ex earns a decent salary but spends it 100% on herself, including a new home, car, trips, etc. So she has an ability to contribute but does not. She is difficult, so DH has chosen not to "upset" her by taking her to court. We have the kids 5-6 days/week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re either all in or you’re out. If you really love him, you will pool your retirement and find a way to make sure his kids get to college. If you can’t do those things, you have no business professing your love and being married.
Oh no, she is not responsible for putting his kids through college. That's on her DH and the kids' mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re either all in or you’re out. If you really love him, you will pool your retirement and find a way to make sure his kids get to college. If you can’t do those things, you have no business professing your love and being married.
Oh no, she is not responsible for putting his kids through college. That's on her DH and the kids' mother.
Anonymous wrote:You’re either all in or you’re out. If you really love him, you will pool your retirement and find a way to make sure his kids get to college. If you can’t do those things, you have no business professing your love and being married.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I made 5x what my wife made for our entire marriage. Are you suggesting that I shouldn’t “subsidize” her retirement?
Did she have a couple of kids with someone else?
Np here. What difference would that make? By the time retirement rolls around, presumably any kids are self-sufficient adults. Op’s dh will have some money in his name, op will have money in her name. I can’t imagine being married and thinking of our retirement funds as seperate assets. That just doesn’t make sense, even when it’s a second marriage with a blended family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I made 5x what my wife made for our entire marriage. Are you suggesting that I shouldn’t “subsidize” her retirement?
Did she have a couple of kids with someone else?
Anonymous wrote:OP, I made 5x what my wife made for our entire marriage. Are you suggesting that I shouldn’t “subsidize” her retirement?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For better or for worse - you are a team now.
This. This situation is a good example of how "separate finances" for married couples don't exist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For better or for worse - you are a team now.
This. This situation is a good example of how "separate finances" for married couples don't exist.
Anonymous wrote:
For better or for worse - you are a team now.
This. This situation is a good example of how "separate finances" for married couples don't exist.