Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry - “...lie to her...”
Yes, but he limits the lie to not revealing his identity in either setting. Importantly, he earns her friendship and then her love with his real identity. It’s true that she doesn’t know he’s also NY152. But before he tells her, he wants her to get to know him as himself. It’s definitely a complication and she can decide against him later but imo he’s still a great romantic lead and it’s a great story anyway. I mean in some sense, she’d already agreed to some subterfuge with the anonymous screen names. She doesn’t tell NY152 who she is either.
You don’t earn trust by not revealing your true identity.
The only reason the character works is because it’s Tom Hanks. Any other leading actor of the era—John Travolta, Michael Douglass, would not have worked.
Sleepless in Seattle is another sh*tty movie that only works b/c of the hanks factor.
Let me guess, Op, you also like Love Actually.
No but also fack you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry - “...lie to her...”
Yes, but he limits the lie to not revealing his identity in either setting. Importantly, he earns her friendship and then her love with his real identity. It’s true that she doesn’t know he’s also NY152. But before he tells her, he wants her to get to know him as himself. It’s definitely a complication and she can decide against him later but imo he’s still a great romantic lead and it’s a great story anyway. I mean in some sense, she’d already agreed to some subterfuge with the anonymous screen names. She doesn’t tell NY152 who she is either.
You don’t earn trust by not revealing your true identity.
The only reason the character works is because it’s Tom Hanks. Any other leading actor of the era—John Travolta, Michael Douglass, would not have worked.
Sleepless in Seattle is another sh*tty movie that only works b/c of the hanks factor.
Let me guess, Op, you also like Love Actually.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope. It gives me solace to know that his brick and mortar bookstore probably got crushed when Amazon came along.
I've mentioned this before on DCUM, but how would that relationship ever progress? Years later, you know they'd be in bed and some version of the following would take place:
Kathleen: Hey, remember when you put me out of business? That sure sucked.
Joe: When will you stop crucifying me with that!?
I could see that if she was professionally broken at the end of the movie, but that’s not the case. She had made peace with closing the shop and was moving on to the next phase of her career.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry - “...lie to her...”
Yes, but he limits the lie to not revealing his identity in either setting. Importantly, he earns her friendship and then her love with his real identity. It’s true that she doesn’t know he’s also NY152. But before he tells her, he wants her to get to know him as himself. It’s definitely a complication and she can decide against him later but imo he’s still a great romantic lead and it’s a great story anyway. I mean in some sense, she’d already agreed to some subterfuge with the anonymous screen names. She doesn’t tell NY152 who she is either.
Anonymous wrote:Nope. It gives me solace to know that his brick and mortar bookstore probably got crushed when Amazon came along.
I've mentioned this before on DCUM, but how would that relationship ever progress? Years later, you know they'd be in bed and some version of the following would take place:
Kathleen: Hey, remember when you put me out of business? That sure sucked.
Joe: When will you stop crucifying me with that!?
Anonymous wrote:Sorry - “...lie to her...”
Anonymous wrote:I love that movie but the Joe Fox character is actually rather manipulative and had I been Kathleen, I would have been angry at him.