Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.
Why?
I posted earlier in the thread 'this is so fake'. Primarily because when someone dies the family either cancels the contract, the number becomes unavailable for a period of time and the number goes back to the pool for eventual reuse, or they I suppose could keep paying it and keep the number for the family.
There's no way it would seamlessly transfer to random fake guy. All of her early messages would've been rejected as the number would have been unavailable, the guy couldn't have had the number the same 4 years her dad was gone.
Plus men (and real people) don't talk like that. I find it sick when people try to play on people's emotions like this.
It didn't necessarily "seamlessly transfer." She could have started the texting months after her father died when, as you said, the number had gone back into the pool to be reassigned.
That's what happened to me when I moved to DC and changed to a 202 number. Soon afterward, someone else got my old 703 number and for months, that person was getting texts and calls that were for me, because there was no way to forward my new number.
So how do you even know this happened if you and the person who got your old number couldn't communicate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.
Why?
I posted earlier in the thread 'this is so fake'. Primarily because when someone dies the family either cancels the contract, the number becomes unavailable for a period of time and the number goes back to the pool for eventual reuse, or they I suppose could keep paying it and keep the number for the family.
There's no way it would seamlessly transfer to random fake guy. All of her early messages would've been rejected as the number would have been unavailable, the guy couldn't have had the number the same 4 years her dad was gone.
Plus men (and real people) don't talk like that. I find it sick when people try to play on people's emotions like this.
It didn't necessarily "seamlessly transfer." She could have started the texting months after her father died when, as you said, the number had gone back into the pool to be reassigned.
That's what happened to me when I moved to DC and changed to a 202 number. Soon afterward, someone else got my old 703 number and for months, that person was getting texts and calls that were for me, because there was no way to forward my new number.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.
Why?
I posted earlier in the thread 'this is so fake'. Primarily because when someone dies the family either cancels the contract, the number becomes unavailable for a period of time and the number goes back to the pool for eventual reuse, or they I suppose could keep paying it and keep the number for the family.
There's no way it would seamlessly transfer to random fake guy. All of her early messages would've been rejected as the number would have been unavailable, the guy couldn't have had the number the same 4 years her dad was gone.
Plus men (and real people) don't talk like that. I find it sick when people try to play on people's emotions like this.
It didn't necessarily "seamlessly transfer." She could have started the texting months after her father died when, as you said, the number had gone back into the pool to be reassigned.
That's what happened to me when I moved to DC and changed to a 202 number. Soon afterward, someone else got my old 703 number and for months, that person was getting texts and calls that were for me, because there was no way to forward my new number.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.
Why?
I posted earlier in the thread 'this is so fake'. Primarily because when someone dies the family either cancels the contract, the number becomes unavailable for a period of time and the number goes back to the pool for eventual reuse, or they I suppose could keep paying it and keep the number for the family.
There's no way it would seamlessly transfer to random fake guy. All of her early messages would've been rejected as the number would have been unavailable, the guy couldn't have had the number the same 4 years her dad was gone.
Plus men (and real people) don't talk like that. I find it sick when people try to play on people's emotions like this.
Anonymous wrote:This struck me as kind of icky. I don’t know why. I’m a pretty sappy person normally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Creeeeeeeeepy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's creepy that he continued to read her messages for 4 years and never told her to stop. And yes, she's stupid for putting personal information out there.
PP here. Maybe I'm cynical, but the wrong person could've tried to blackmail her or blasted her messages on social media. Also, I
m not 100% sure this isn't made up for attention. This will be the new way to go viral.
This is most definitely fake.