Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s bothers me that schools even allow this. Why not just let 10 year olds in K?? I mean wouldn’t they perform better then? /s.
I don’t understand why this bothers you. If he’s not successful in K he’s going to have to repeat at the expense of the school district and will still be older than everyone plus he’ll have to deal with the emotions fall out of repeating while his classmates advance. It’s the same outcome.
It is a slippery slope. This lady thinks it’s fine to send a 6y8m old kid to K. If that’s fine, why not 7? 7.5? At some point the answer just has to be NO.
Anonymous wrote:I would not.
Why? That is going to be a huge age discrepancy. For every parent who sends their fall birthday kid on time, your son will be 21 months older than than them!
The kids do eventually wise up to these things and they consider the "old" kids to be the dumb ones. I've heard them talking about it amongst themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t you wait to decide. A lot can happen language-wise in a year, especially with speech therapy. Put a deposit down on your preschool whenever that happens and pre-register for kindergarten as well so you can do the spring walk through. You can decide as late as August what to do. No need to make this decision now.
Anonymous wrote:Our cut off date was Sept 1 and we had a mid-August baby who started K on time and she was the youngest in her class. She struggled and when we relocated after first grade we had her repeat the year and it really helped her a great deal and she never knew until years later that she had repeated a grade. The relo was fortuitous as I’m not sure what we would have done if we were at the same school. Some kids are ready, some are not and I think it really depends on physical maturity and the quality of the pre-school the child attended.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s bothers me that schools even allow this. Why not just let 10 year olds in K?? I mean wouldn’t they perform better then? /s.
I don’t understand why this bothers you. If he’s not successful in K he’s going to have to repeat at the expense of the school district and will still be older than everyone plus he’ll have to deal with the emotions fall out of repeating while his classmates advance. It’s the same outcome.
Anonymous wrote:It’s bothers me that schools even allow this. Why not just let 10 year olds in K?? I mean wouldn’t they perform better then? /s.