Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is strange to me that you think that you care more about the child's interests than his father does. It is beyond not your business that he's marrying, having babies, or who he's leaving money to. Please do not speak to anyone about this. Not all feelings are valid and deserve to be attended to. This is one that you need to let go of because it's not even close to appropriate for you to be concerned with someone else's inheritance.
DP here:
The problem I envision is that the older boy and new step-mom may not get along. She may encourage the dad to cut off college payments, if issues arise: "Oh, we have a young baby and two other kids from my previous marriage. We really need to keep all our money right now. Timmy can just take out some student loans to get by."
Recently deceased DW probably worked hard to save for her son's college. That may be at-risk. Plus, it sounds like Dad will need to put three other kids through college.
If my DW ever passes away, the first thing I'm doing is getting a vasectomy. Having a baby at age 50 is just telling everyone that you won't retire until age 70. No way.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry about the loss of your friend.
It's good that he was able to find love again and remarry. And it would make no sense, logically or in terms of love, for him to hold his son separate from his new family and children. In time you may be able to see that.
Anonymous wrote:It is strange to me that you think that you care more about the child's interests than his father does. It is beyond not your business that he's marrying, having babies, or who he's leaving money to. Please do not speak to anyone about this. Not all feelings are valid and deserve to be attended to. This is one that you need to let go of because it's not even close to appropriate for you to be concerned with someone else's inheritance.
Anonymous wrote:OP, first, I would be upset too, on behalf of your deceased friend and son.
Second, 13:23 is correct, but doesn't understand that the delivery matters. 13:23 please google Marshall McLuhan.
So I'll just say this: The money is the husband's and not owed to the child; and the child should be expecting nothing. The husband did make a promise to your friend, but both were at the time unknowing that this promise would then get in the way of his happiness with his new mate. Your friend would not want that. If there is a heaven, then she can see what he is trying to do, that he is trying to build another family for himself and their child.
His actions may end up being misguided; he can then correct that; documents can be changed. But it's a way to give him, and his son, the best chance at this new arrangement.
So I think, OP, that this is a situation where reasonable people can make different choices, and although it's not a choice that you (or I ) would make, it's understandable.
Finally, depending on how well you know the DH, you could go to him and confess the elephant on the table, leading with that it's none of your business, but you are coming to him to help you reconcile how you feel --happy for him, worried about his son, trying to deal with knowing what the arrangement was at your friend's death....see what he says
Anonymous wrote:Hold on - the new woman is already pregnant and now they are recently engaged?
How dumb is this guy? He's going to get taken to the cleaners by a single mom with 2 existing kids. He needs to protect his assets.
How well does he know this woman?
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but that's ridiculous. Your friend's husband didn't die with her, "nearing 50" is not 80, he is entitled to move on with his life and to start a family with his new spouse if he so chooses. Oldest son is in college, he's not being neglected or abused or being left to starve in the streets. No one is guaranteed or has the right to expect any inheritance.
Anonymous wrote:My friend was sick for many years and passed away three years ago. Her husband is nearing 50, her son just started his Freshman year at a prestigious school, we’re all so proud of the two of them for making it through these last couple years together.
the reason why I’m turning to DCUM and not friends is because I get that a lot of my concerns are none of my business, and possibly fueled by grief. He is engaged and planning to remarry, that’s fine, but my issue is she has two kids and now they’re expecting a baby. When my friend died, him starting another family was off the table, and that’s all I really know about the depth of their conversations. It was set-in-stone kind of decision, he was done with having children. I know she left this world thinking her son was heir to 100% of their family’s wealth, and now that number is split to 25%. Legally he plans to divide everything between the 4 children equally, he’s said this part out loud (he thought it was a funny remark).
I feel so much anger towards him, and I guess on her behalf? I’m not angry about a new baby, but I am angry that he doesn’t have the intelligence to protect HIS as children. My friends gone and her husband is giving away the farm, I just feel bad all around.
Anonymous wrote:I agree I’d be angry his son was not his #1 priority. I would make my husband swear it on my deathbed.